Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe ERA Solidifies Women's Rights in the Constitution as the 28th Amendment
The federal government has finally recognized the Equal Rights Amendment as the 28th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, ushering in a whole new era for gender parity in this country.
Is this a permanent amendment?
Yes. Amendments to the Constitution are permanent and cannot be reversed. The only exception to this is by the full ratification of another separate amendment, as happened with Prohibition. According to Article 5 of the Constitution, amendments must be passed by two-thirds of each house of Congress, which happened March 22, 1972, and ratified by three-fourths of the states, or 38, which happened on January 27, 2020. It is now a permanent part of the Constitution and recognized by the federal government as such.
Yes. Amendments to the Constitution are permanent and cannot be reversed. The only exception to this is by the full ratification of another separate amendment, as happened with Prohibition. According to Article 5 of the Constitution, amendments must be passed by two-thirds of each house of Congress, which happened March 22, 1972, and ratified by three-fourths of the states, or 38, which happened on January 27, 2020. It is now a permanent part of the Constitution and recognized by the federal government as such.
https://www.americanprogress.org/article/the-era-solidifies-womens-rights-in-the-constitution-as-the-28th-amendment/
The Equal Rights Amendment is now in the Constitution. It is the law of the land.
Bring on the MAGA court battles, we are ready to defend it.
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The ERA Solidifies Women's Rights in the Constitution as the 28th Amendment (Original Post)
Quiet Em
11 hrs ago
OP
I believe such a decision is within the authority of the Archivist, not the President on his own authority
Seeking Serenity
10 hrs ago
#3
hedda_foil
(16,552 posts)1. This is far from a done deal. Biden said he considered it passed.
The courts will be asked to weigh in by every rw legal group in the country and out. There are several major issues that could outweigh Biden's statement.
Quiet Em
(1,385 posts)2. There will be a legal battle.
I believe we are ready and prepared for that legal battle.
EdmondDantes_
(159 posts)5. I can think of 6 problems with this
Roberts, Alito, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Coney Barrett.
Not saying we shouldn't fight for equal rights, but given the issues around the time limit and revocation of ratification, I am sure this isn't going to pass review by the courts, especially the Supreme Court.
Quiet Em
(1,385 posts)6. Let them try to take it away.
Seeking Serenity
(3,090 posts)3. I believe such a decision is within the authority of the Archivist, not the President on his own authority
Quiet Em
(1,385 posts)4. The archivist has no authority.
mahatmakanejeeves
(62,102 posts)7. Goodness
1 U.S. Code § 106b - Amendments to Constitution
Full disclosure: IANAL
Whenever official notice is received at the National Archives and Records Administration that any amendment proposed to the Constitution of the United States has been adopted, according to the provisions of the Constitution, the Archivist of the United States shall forthwith cause the amendment to be published, with his certificate, specifying the States by which the same may have been adopted, and that the same has become valid, to all intents and purposes, as a part of the Constitution of the United States.
(Added Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 2(b), 65 Stat. 710; amended Pub. L. 98497, title I, § 107(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2291.)
(Added Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, § 2(b), 65 Stat. 710; amended Pub. L. 98497, title I, § 107(d), Oct. 19, 1984, 98 Stat. 2291.)
Full disclosure: IANAL