Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Grassley and Durbin want to know the reasons for the firing of the inspector generals (Original Post)
LetMyPeopleVote
Yesterday
OP
yellow dahlia
(796 posts)1. Wow! Grassley is standing up and pushing back.
It was great (and almost hopeful) to read their letter.
Thank you.
Klarkashton
(2,669 posts)2. If they are expecting trump to admit why they are wasting
Their time.
Mister Ed
(6,430 posts)3. True, but it would be far worse for them to remain silent. n/t
ReRe
(11,056 posts)4. We need about a gazillion of these
coming form all corners of Washington D.C. everyday for 4 years.
Which reminds me, why aren't we hearing more rebukes from our Courts?
What do we have to do, sue the Administration?
Irish_Dem
(62,147 posts)5. They know exactly why Trump fired the IG's.
What are they going to do about it.
LetMyPeopleVote
(157,107 posts)6. Bipartisan senators demand Trump explanation for IG firings
Link to tweet
https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5111427-senators-explanation-trump-ig-firings/
The leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee sent a rare bipartisan letter to President Trump demanding an explanation for his firing of 17 inspectors general (IG) in one night.
The rebuke said Trump violated the law by failing to give Congress 30 days notice and a rationale for the removal for each of the watchdogs at the 18 agencies where they provided oversight.
Congress was not provided the legally required 30-day notice and case-specific reasons for removal, as required by law. Accordingly, we request that you provide that information immediately, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote in the joint letter.
While IGs arent immune from committing acts requiring their removal, and they can be removed by the president, the law must be followed. The communication to Congress must contain more than just broad and vague statements, rather it must include sufficient facts and details to assure Congress and the public that the termination is due to real concerns about the Inspector Generals ability to carry out their mission.
The letter also asks Trump to list which acting officials will take over their roles.
The rebuke said Trump violated the law by failing to give Congress 30 days notice and a rationale for the removal for each of the watchdogs at the 18 agencies where they provided oversight.
Congress was not provided the legally required 30-day notice and case-specific reasons for removal, as required by law. Accordingly, we request that you provide that information immediately, Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) wrote in the joint letter.
While IGs arent immune from committing acts requiring their removal, and they can be removed by the president, the law must be followed. The communication to Congress must contain more than just broad and vague statements, rather it must include sufficient facts and details to assure Congress and the public that the termination is due to real concerns about the Inspector Generals ability to carry out their mission.
The letter also asks Trump to list which acting officials will take over their roles.