DOJ's "weaponization" plan B is to provide frothy content for right-wing conspiracy theorists

[Nevilledog]

https://www.mediamatters.org/fox-news/dojs-weaponization-plan-b-provide-frothy-content-right-wing-conspiracy-theorists

The Justice Department’s “Weaponization Working Group” is the fruit of a yearslong right-wing effort to portray federal law enforcement against Donald Trump and his allies as criminal in nature. But if that task force fails to bring charges against Trump’s purported enemies, its head, the right-wing activist Ed Martin, is promising to publicly “name” and “shame” those individuals — a clear violation of longstanding DOJ policy which would provide chum for MAGA media while turning its targets into hate objects.

“There are some really bad actors, some people that did some really bad things to the American people. And if they can be charged, we’ll charge them. But if they can’t be charged, we will name them,” said Martin, who recently stepped down as acting U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia when it became clear he could not secure Senate confirmation. “And we will name them, and in a culture that respects shame, they should be people that are ashamed. And that’s a fact. That’s the way things work. And so that’s, that’s how I believe the job operates.”

Martin may not actually realize this — he’s a political hack who represented January 6 defendants rather than an experienced prosecutor — but that is not how the job is supposed to operate. Indeed, as NBC News’ Ryan J. Reilly notes: “During Trump's first tenure, the justification given for Trump's firing of former FBI Director James Comey was that Comey had given a press conference in which he released ‘derogatory information’ about then-presidential candidate Hillary Clinton in 2016.”

Martin’s proposal to “name” and “shame” rather than prosecute Trump’s foes seems on the one hand like a significant retreat — a sign that he doesn’t think that the purported crimes he and his colleagues happily detailed in their books, podcasts, and Fox shows can pass muster with a federal judge.

*snip*

[Boomerproud]

1. A culture that respects shame...his words.

Who is he talking about? Certainly not Magaworld.

[madinmaryland]

2. I thought this had Santorum material in it. 🤢🤮

[Martin Eden]

3. The proposal to "name" has absolutely NOTHING to do with "shame"

There is no "shame" in enforcing Constitutional rule of law.

THE INTENT is stochastic terrorism.

Broadcasting the names of persons the Trump regime identifies as wrongfully harming Dear Leader (and therefore America) will put the lives of those persons and their families at risk.