General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBeto O'Rourke says 'if' Texans want him to run for U.S. Senate, 'yes I will'
Article is two weeks old, but I missed it. So, what do ya think?
It may be the closest ORourke, an El Paso Democrat, has come to announcing for what is expected to be a $200 million-plus campaign against either incumbent U.S. Sen. John Cornyn or challenger Attorney General Ken Paxton, a McKinney Republican.
ORourke, then a member of the U.S. House, lost to incumbent Sen. Ted Cruz by 3 percentage points in a 2018 election that lifted him into the national spotlight. In 2022, he lost to Gov. Greg Abbott by 11 points.
He raised nearly $180 million for the two campaigns. The 2026 Democratic nominee for Senate will be expected to raise as much as $100 million.
Read more...
LudwigPastorius
(14,048 posts)with his were going to take your AR15s remark.
Maybe someday, if Texas turns a lot bluer, hes got a shot. But, I think the best that can be hoped for now is a more centrist candidate taking away a Senate seat from the GOPers.
markodochartaigh
(4,904 posts)was 52/46, r/D; 2024 was 56/42, r/D. But Texas has one of the lowest voting rates in the states. And the Republicans are playing handball, and they are upping their game, even singling out the largest and most Democratic county, Harris (Houston) for tactics which Putin would consider daring.
For any Democratic politician to win they will have to turn out huge numbers of the non-voters. Even if we are staring down the barrel of the worst depression since 1929 or 1873 (which the Republicans will blame on President Biden, and they WILL be believed by one third of Texans), Texans will remember that Beto said that he would take away their ar type guns. I like Beto and I wish that he could win. But without addressing the Republican anti-democracy strategies successfully and without turning out at least a million of the non-voters I don't see how he can win.
Melon
(983 posts)Last edited Fri May 16, 2025, 06:35 AM - Edit history (1)
Hes tried. Bringing his name up down here is opening yourself up for both barrels of criticism. Amongst democratic voters I hear the same negativity. Its a waste of money and an opportunity to develop a better candidate.
JI7
(93,115 posts)Melon
(983 posts)The fact that we need to not waste money on candidates that are perineal losers. Why are we hearing Beto? Weve long since given up on him and his tainted brand. We should have another front running name being marketed and he goes and gets a normal job.
Celerity
(53,550 posts)of wishcasting and hundreds of millions of USD flushed down the shitter.
Skittles
(169,244 posts)yeah OK
Prairie Gates
(7,131 posts)What an edit!
Skittles
(169,244 posts)gotta.....cover them tracks
fujiyamasan
(1,127 posts)Ted Cruz was an unusually odious and unpopular incumbent
yet he won because hes a republican, and I think thats all that matters in a statewide race for the near future. Cruz was also facing a bunch of headwinds. At that time, Trump was not popular nationwide and it was a democratic wave midterm.
Cruz won much more comfortably in 24.
Im not very bullish on democrats winning a statewide race in Texas in the near term, especially not for a federal election (senate or presidential). Unless it took an Alabama special election type event, where Doug jones won (which was pretty wild). But I think its better to chip away at other offices and build upwards.
After making some progress over the years, democrats ceded way too much ground in the state, especially in the border communities. I think volunteers have really been working on turning it purple.
blogslug
(39,077 posts)That's what I think.
Polybius
(21,394 posts)Paxon is just that crazy.
Liberal In Texas
(15,942 posts)campaign and the more high profile the campaign the more money is spent. They manage early in any campaign to buy up most of the local television and radio time. This assures a constant stream of propaganda in a state with not even one progressive radio station.
Jose Garcia
(3,416 posts)krawhitham
(5,052 posts)So NO
BTW he did not raise 180M in the two campaigns, he raised 79M in 2018 and 66M in 2022 for at total of 145M not 180M
Colin Allred raised 93M in 2024