Why didn't she call him "Jeffrey"?

[kentuck]

I thought they were rather close?

But she kept referring to him as "Epstein" in the questions by the Trump lawyer?

It just sounded a little unusual to me?

Also, why did they feel like they had to vindicate Clinton and Trump together in the same press release? Did they think that would make it easier to believe?

And doesn't the movement to a posh minimum security camp look a little like a "quid pro quo"?

These people are so devious. Only a criminal mind can keep up with them.

[underpants]

1. She read the script and got her deal.

It’s definitely quid pro quo.

The Clinton part? We both know this whole Clustertrump are morons.

[FakeNoose]

2. Maybe she did call him Jeff or Jeffrey ... I'm sure the DoJ has doctored everything

Do you have any doubts that DoJ would make edits wherever they wanted to? Yes they're probably "destroying" evidence or at least altering it.

We'll never get to see the real stuff anyway. The only hope is that Bill Barr preserved an exact duplicate and hid it away somewhere. But even if he did, WE won't get to see it.

[Staph]

3. That didn't bother me.

I have a friend from college who's last name is Hubbs. Everyone calls him Hubbs, including his wife!

[Orrex]

4. To create the illusion of distance, of course.

[LiberalArkie]

5. Where I retired from everyone called each other by their last name.

[TnDem]

6. Me too

I retired with 20 years from a place and it was all last names...Where I currently work is mostly last names too...Women, men, everybody.