General Discussion

EarlG

(23,581 posts) Wed Dec 31, 2025, 04:19 PM Dec 31

Jack Smith Deposition: Full Video (no commentary)

Last edited Wed Dec 31, 2025, 05:11 PM - Edit history (1)

Edited to add: FYI there is an earlier thread on this topic which has now had the same video added to the OP, if you want to get in on the conversation over there:

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100220899413

This is over eight hours long. I've watched the first 30 minutes or so and it is quite riveting. The first questioner does a pretty terrible job of trying to undermine Smith.

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Jack Smith Deposition: Full Video (no commentary) (Original Post) EarlG Dec 31 OP

I'm watching it now Nictuku Dec 31 #1

PDF transcript here: littlemissmartypants Dec 31 #2

Thanks! sheshe2 Dec 31 #3

TY EarlG! Cha Dec 31 #4

Thank you for posting PatSeg Dec 31 #5

Thanks for posting MustLoveBeagles Dec 31 #6

Smith's case relied heavily on Republicans. Uncle Joe Dec 31 #7

Wow! I'm looking forward to this! liberalla Dec 31 #8

Bookmarked, TY quaint Dec 31 #9

Thank you! ancianita Dec 31 #10

Bookmarked and passed along LilElf70 Dec 31 #11

Questioner does not understand KT2000 Dec 31 #12

Probably intentional obfuscation. Nt BootinUp Dec 31 #13

Yep. That's right out of the Republican playbook, utilized when the usual lies won't work. FadedMullet Dec 31 #14

K&R red dog 1 Dec 31 #15

Thank you. Bookmarking. yellow dahlia Dec 31 #16

riveting Kali Jan 1 #17

Allison Gill's "Unjustified" podcast brakester Jan 5 #18

Nictuku

(4,635 posts)

1. I'm watching it now

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 04:30 PM

Dec 31

I guess I'm a nerd.

littlemissmartypants

(32,808 posts)

2. PDF transcript here:

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 04:33 PM

Dec 31

https://judiciary.house.gov/sites/evo-subsites/republicans-judiciary.house.gov/files/2025-12/Smith-Depo-Transcript_Redacted-w-Errata.pdf

sheshe2

(97,090 posts)

3. Thanks!

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 04:34 PM

Dec 31

Cha

(318,409 posts)

4. TY EarlG!

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 04:34 PM

Dec 31

PatSeg

(53,064 posts)

5. Thank you for posting

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 04:36 PM

Dec 31

MustLoveBeagles

(15,814 posts)

6. Thanks for posting

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 04:38 PM

Dec 31

Bookmarking.

🎉🥳

Uncle Joe

(64,855 posts)

7. Smith's case relied heavily on Republicans.

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 04:45 PM

Dec 31

Thanks for the thread EarlG

liberalla

(11,009 posts)

8. Wow! I'm looking forward to this!

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 04:52 PM

Dec 31

Thanks for posting!!!!

quaint

(4,932 posts)

9. Bookmarked, TY

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 05:04 PM

Dec 31

ancianita

(43,248 posts)

10. Thank you!

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 05:13 PM

Dec 31

LilElf70

(1,513 posts)

11. Bookmarked and passed along

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 05:37 PM

Dec 31

to everyone I know. TYTYTYTY Ya gotta love it

KT2000

(22,097 posts)

12. Questioner does not understand

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 05:56 PM

Dec 31

the job of the prosecutor. He is relying on conspiracy theories and is not the facts of the case.

BootinUp

(51,141 posts)

13. Probably intentional obfuscation. Nt

Reply to KT2000 (Reply #12)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 06:00 PM

Dec 31

FadedMullet

(857 posts)

14. Yep. That's right out of the Republican playbook, utilized when the usual lies won't work.

Reply to BootinUp (Reply #13)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 06:53 PM

Dec 31

red dog 1

(32,864 posts)

15. K&R

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 07:05 PM

Dec 31

And shared on Bluesky

yellow dahlia

(5,572 posts)

16. Thank you. Bookmarking.

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Wed Dec 31, 2025, 10:26 PM

Dec 31

Kali

(56,792 posts)

17. riveting

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Thu Jan 1, 2026, 08:26 PM

Jan 1

watched the whole thing. good man.

brakester

(582 posts)

18. Allison Gill's "Unjustified" podcast

Reply to EarlG (Original post)

Mon Jan 5, 2026, 04:26 PM

Jan 5

is running excerpts of Jack Smith's testimony. She thinks Jack Smith would make an excellent Attorney General and I enthusiastically agree! She is very knowledgeable and has several other podcasts she does like "The Daily Beans" and "Clean-up on Aisle 45" that are well-worth subscribing to. She also did a past podcast called "Jack" that chronicled the entire Jack Smith investigation of our now Crass Criminal-in-Chief.

Reply to this discussion