Why wouldn't, say, Denmark be justified in taking care of Trump?

[Orrex]

He presents a credible threat, he has demonstrated intent, and he's proven his willingness to act unilaterally. Not to mention our honorable military that's willing to do whatever he says, apparently.

If Denmark opted to take preemptive action, who could fault them?

[Ocelot II]

1. What if they threatened to give him back?

[Orrex]

3. Too horrible to contemplate

[unblock]

2. Seems Donnie believes in open borders for this sort of thing

[greatauntoftriplets]

4. I'm good with that, but....

Does anyone want him?

[31st Street Bridge]

5. Too many nations have become passively complacent

And we wondered how Hitler got as far as he did.

[Torchlight]

6. In my best judge's voice: "I'll allow it..."

Denmark treats mental illness as an actual illness... trump could benefit greatly from a 5-7 year stay in Copenhagen.

[gAI Obsession]

7. Not something he deserves. Find a maximum security pen with 'treatment' options.

Turkey sounds good.