Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(175,250 posts)
Tue Jan 13, 2026, 06:05 PM 2 hrs ago

Halligan defends her use of U.S. attorney title in combative court filing

A court filing by Lindsey Halligan accuses a federal judge of making “rudimentary” legal errors, marking another escalation in the Trump administration’s clash with the judiciary.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2026/01/13/virgina-united-states-attorney-trump-halligan/

The Justice Department responded defiantly Tuesday to an order from a federal judge directing Lindsey Halligan to explain why she continues to use the title U.S. attorney in Virginia despite another judge’s ruling that her appointment was unconstitutional.

In a response signed by Halligan, the Justice Department opposed U.S. District Judge David Novak, who demanded last week that Halligan account for why she continues to use the U.S. attorney title in court filings. Novak, a Richmond judge who Trump nominated to the bench in 2019, suggested Halligan’s use of the title could amount to false or misleading statements.

“The bottom line is that Ms. Halligan has not ‘misrepresented’ anything and the Court is flat wrong to suggest that any change to the Government’s signature block is warranted in this or any other case,” the response said.

The response, which accuses Novak of making “rudimentary” legal errors and missing “elementary” legal principles, is written in a derisive tone unusual for a government lawyer addressing a federal judge.....

Several other judges in the Eastern District have called for Halligan’s name and U.S. attorney title to be struck from court filings.

U.S. District Judge Leonie M. Brinkema, who supervises the Alexandria, Virginia, courthouse, on Friday struck Halligan’s name from a case, commenting that “she should resign from the position at this point.”

In November, U.S. District Judge Cameron McGowan Currie ruled that Halligan’s appointment as interim U.S. attorney was invalid because of an unusual maneuver the Trump administration used to install her. Trump had previously appointed an interim prosecutor to lead the office, Erik S. Siebert, at the start of his term in January 2025. Siebert was forced out in September after declining to seek charges against former FBI director James B. Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Career prosecutors had recommended against pursuing the two cases because of insufficient evidence of wrongdoing.

I have read the brief filed by the DOJ and Halligan. I would not be surprised to see some sanctions issued due to Halligan being an utter asshole in this filing
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Halligan defends her use of U.S. attorney title in combative court filing (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote 2 hrs ago OP
She needs to be immediately disbarred as should every single attorney at the DOJ who supports her. Wiz Imp 2 hrs ago #1
From your keyboard to God's ears! lastlib 2 hrs ago #2
Insulting a judge is bad enough, but she's openly defying a judge and saying she Wiz Imp 53 min ago #3
Doesnt she have staff that can explain Johonny 50 min ago #4

Wiz Imp

(9,041 posts)
1. She needs to be immediately disbarred as should every single attorney at the DOJ who supports her.
Tue Jan 13, 2026, 06:09 PM
2 hrs ago

lastlib

(27,593 posts)
2. From your keyboard to God's ears!
Tue Jan 13, 2026, 06:28 PM
2 hrs ago

Or at least her Bar association....

Insulting a federal judge in the way she did is not a great career move.

Wiz Imp

(9,041 posts)
3. Insulting a judge is bad enough, but she's openly defying a judge and saying she
Tue Jan 13, 2026, 07:47 PM
53 min ago

knows the law better than the judge. That is absolutely actionable.

Johonny

(25,533 posts)
4. Doesnt she have staff that can explain
Tue Jan 13, 2026, 07:50 PM
50 min ago

This not only won't work, but will be counter productive

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Halligan defends her use ...