Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

question everything

(51,754 posts)
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 09:37 PM 19 hrs ago

Exclusive: Pelosi privately blasts Democrats for vote to hold Clintons in contempt in Epstein probe

Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was disappointed after nearly half of the House Oversight Committee’s Democrats voted Wednesday to hold Bill and Hillary Clinton in contempt of Congress for defying subpoenas in its Jeffrey Epstein investigation. And on Thursday, she let them know it.

In a private meeting, Pelosi said she was upset that Democrats supported the contempt vote because the former president and former secretary of state were still negotiating with the committee over the terms of a possible future appearance, two sources in the room told CNN.

One of the sources in the room described Pelosi as “emphatic” and said of the former speaker’s remarks: “When she speaks, she means it. She knows her voice has power.”

The former speaker suggested no proceedings should move forward against the Clintons until after the Justice Department has released all of the Epstein investigative files.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/exclusive-pelosi-privately-blasts-democrats-225041548.html

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Exclusive: Pelosi privately blasts Democrats for vote to hold Clintons in contempt in Epstein probe (Original Post) question everything 19 hrs ago OP
No shit. Good for her! FoxNewsSucks 19 hrs ago #1
Oh my God. They DID? What the fuck is wrong with these people?? Scrivener7 19 hrs ago #2
They all need to be primaried, whoever they are! SheltieLover 19 hrs ago #5
Absolutely. It is of course disloyal, but it's also just stunningly dumb, Scrivener7 19 hrs ago #7
Exceptionally disrespectful to immigrants & all brutalized AND MURDERED BY THEM SheltieLover 19 hrs ago #9
here ya go orleans 17 hrs ago #18
Ty SheltieLover 14 hrs ago #19
Pelosi is right on this. Swede 19 hrs ago #3
Where was Jeffries? Not involved i this, perhaps? SheltieLover 19 hrs ago #4
MIA newdeal2 19 hrs ago #11
Cripes... SheltieLover 19 hrs ago #12
Having milk and cookies at Garlands house nt yaesu 18 hrs ago #14
I know, and WTF??? a kennedy 19 hrs ago #6
When we had a REAL leader ... usonian 19 hrs ago #8
I heard that with the contempt charge, there will be discovery processes MagickMuffin 19 hrs ago #10
IMHO B&C's "angle" should be "We'll go show up right after Mister Birthday Card Secrets" AZJonnie 19 hrs ago #13
Can't blame her fujiyamasan 18 hrs ago #15
And people wonder why the Dem's can't fight against Trump Bev54 17 hrs ago #16
Punkass LuvLoogie 17 hrs ago #17

FoxNewsSucks

(11,512 posts)
1. No shit. Good for her!
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 09:39 PM
19 hrs ago

And no Democrat should vote for continued ICE funding. What the fuck is wrong with them??

orleans

(36,699 posts)
18. here ya go
Fri Jan 23, 2026, 12:05 AM
17 hrs ago


The nine Democrats who voted to advance the resolution concerning former President Clinton were Reps. Maxwell Frost (Fla.), Raja Krishnamoorthi (Ill.), Summer Lee (Pa.), Stephen Lynch (Mass.), Ayanna Pressley (Mass.), Emily Randall (Wash.), Lateefah Simon (Calif.), Melanie Stansbury (N.M.) and Rashida Tlaib (Mich.).

Rep. Dave Min (D-Calif.) voted “present” on both resolutions, and Rep. Yassamin Ansari (D-Ariz.) voted “present” on only the legislation related to the former president.

Only Lee, Stansbury and Tlaib voted to advance the resolution pertaining to Hillary Clinton.

more



https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5699996-democrats-clintons-contempt-vote/

MagickMuffin

(18,106 posts)
10. I heard that with the contempt charge, there will be discovery processes
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 10:06 PM
19 hrs ago


So, everything should be exposed in regards to the Epstein files.

I’m not lawyer but that is something I saw from an attorney.


AZJonnie

(2,981 posts)
13. IMHO B&C's "angle" should be "We'll go show up right after Mister Birthday Card Secrets"
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 10:14 PM
19 hrs ago

And hence that should've been Pelosi's angle, as well as the reason for all these Democrats in voting NO.

Congressional Dems immediate response to the idea of a subpoena for the Clintons should have been "Trump should go first" and that's what they should've continued to say.

The files released under Bondi/Trump are a freaking joke. We got 10's of 1000's recently, and even with the whole world un-redacting a ton of them, what did we get? Ooooh, Larry Summers asking him for advice on his love life, and USVI rep (-D) chatting with him during a congressional appearance by Cohen.

Whoa!!!

That's all we will ever see, friends. Trivial shit like this. As I've said many times, I don't think there was any big pedo ring/cabal to begin with, and I've spelled out the reasons why enough times I won't revisit in this context, but even if there WAS? It will NEVER be released on Trump's watch. The whole exercise is a waste of time, and ....... wait for it ....... a DISTRACTION.

Literally, apart from Andrew, Brunel (dead) and Wexner, the single person we have the MOST reason to suspect as 'involved' is DJT, and the best evidence there is is that birthday note, and the dozens of pics of him WITH Epstein.

Make his fucking ass testify!!!

fujiyamasan

(1,336 posts)
15. Can't blame her
Thu Jan 22, 2026, 11:33 PM
18 hrs ago

Between that vote and the ICE funding bill, it starts to look like the party is in disarray.

Do you think republicans would ever hold one of their own in contempt? They flout subpoenas all the time and guess what?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Exclusive: Pelosi private...