"I Audited $2.1 Billion in Epstein Financial Records. Here's Every Name the Money Touched."

[Nevilledog]

https://randallscott25-star.github.io/epstein-forensic-finance/narratives/19_grand_opus_narrative.html

I started this project because the documents were public and everybody was reading them. One file at a time, one name at a time. I wanted to do more than read them. I wanted to follow the money — across every wire, every shell, every bank — and find out where it all led. A shell upon a shell inside a shell.

Thousands of pages of wire transfer records, bank statements, CHIPS and SWIFT logs, canceled checks, and SAR narratives — all released by the Department of Justice and various court proceedings. The raw material for a forensic audit was sitting on government servers. So I built one.

Over the course of this project, I processed 10 distinct payment types across 14 financial institutions. The publication ledger holds 10,964 unique transactions totaling $2.146 billion (Unverified). That figure breaks down into four tiers: $1.61 billion in wire transfers, CHIPS, and SWIFT transactions; $343 million in bank statement entries; $7.6 million in checks and cash instruments; and $185 million in contextual document references.

The first three tiers alone total $1.96 billion. That's 104.4% of the aggregate values reported in the banks' own SARs. The data doesn't just corroborate the suspicious activity reports. It slightly exceeds them.

*snip*

[Another Jackalope]

1. Wow.

I am NOT a money guy - columns of figures chase me right off - but this made my eyes bug out. I've never seen a blueprint of a money laundering machine before. Just wow.

[usonian]

2. The Trump-Epstein sex, blackmail and money-laundering criminal operation is the biggest in recorded history.

Not even a f***ing hot war can stop it from being uncovered.

[Amaryllis]

4. Dont forget drug trafficking and prostitution.

[usonian]

6. I think back to Laverne and Shirley

Like, who can keep up with the worst criminals in history?

Give us any chance - we'll take it
Read us any law - we'll break it
We're gonna beat it out of you
Doin' it our way

No one's gonna turn us back now
Cause we'll stab them in the back now
We're gonna take it all from you
Doin' it our way

In short, the Libertarian Four Freedoms.




source: https://www.lyricsondemand.com/tvthemes/laverneandshirleylyrics.html

[niyad]

39. Well done!

[calimary]

46. Yep.

Funny and entertaining when a couple of female commoners do it.

HELL ON EARTH when the broad-based victimization it’s engendered when allowed to play out on a frighteningly large reality.

[TygrBright]

3. Guy should get a Pulitzer. n/t

[RetiredParatrooper]

7. And a security company

Just to be sure.

[TygrBright]

24. LOL, true dat! n/t

[KewlKat]

5. The question now is, Will anyone do anything with all this information?

[3Hotdogs]

10. Authorities have probably had this info for years.

Ain't nuthin gonna be done with it until Anal Fistula croaks. And maybe not even then.

[LiberalArkie]

17. Because of the income level. The lords in the U.S. are more protected than the Lords in England

[OldBaldy1701E]

30. Well, they tweaked our entire society to favor themselves.

But, let's keep on using that same corrupted system to try and fix the issues with the tweaked and corrupted system.

That makes perfect sense.

[LiberalArkie]

34. I think it is strange when people talk about the US is controlled by oligarchs, when it was founded by oligarchs

but is moving to a plutocracy.

What is the Difference Between Oligarchy and Plutocracy - Pediaa.Com
Plutocracy and oligarchy are both forms of governance characterized by the concentration of power in a small group, but they differ in their basis of power:
Oligarchy refers to rule by a small group of privileged individuals, regardless of their wealth or status.

Plutocracy, on the other hand, specifically denotes a system where power is held by a small group of wealthy individuals.

Essentially, plutocracy is a subset of oligarchy, as it focuses on the wealth of the ruling minority.


In summary, while both systems involve a small ruling class, plutocracy is centered around wealth, whereas oligarchy can include any small group in power.

[OldBaldy1701E]

42. That is probably due to an incomplete understanding of the specifics.

It is why I always mention wealth when I say 'oligarchy', so that one can understand which aspect of oligarchy that I am referring to.

Oligarchy refers to rule by a small group of privileged individuals, regardless of their wealth or status.

I would also point out that, in our society, being privileged comes from having wealth and status. I am not really aware of any other way to be 'privileged' in the modern U.S.A..

[LiberalArkie]

43. Yea, and all of us taught that we were born to be the land of the free. when really it was just rich people leaving

England because they did not want to pay the crown the taxes for such things as roads and schools and such things.

That is why the "Boston Tea Party" was such a big thing in British Colonial America.

[OldBaldy1701E]

66. Hehe... don't get me started on the propaganda machine that is 'modern education'! (n/t)

[NJCher]

60. I doubt it

if they had this info for years, why has Wyden consistently asked for documents? He's the follow the money guy in Congress. As outspoken as he's been, someone would have tipped him off to the availability of financial documents.

[erronis]

8. This is an amazing report. The author carefully documents his findings/methods on github

as a way to safeguard and distribute the information.

It is very easy for anyone (you, me) to pull all of his material to your local storage (or your cloud) by doing a git fork from the repository at https://github.com/randallscott25-star/epstein-forensic-finance

Github is owned by Microsoft and I can see that company agreeing to take this information down on a request from the empire or powerful individuals (Bill Gates?) Copies in the wild will prevent them from covering it up.

[Attilatheblond]

54. Thank you!

Copies in the wild are essential for this kind of information. The War Lords will be taking this down daily.

[Amaryllis]

9. Senator Wyden blasts DEA, asks why 'major' investigation into Epstein never led to charges (drugs,prostitution, money)

https://www.oregonlive.com/politics/2026/02/oregon-senator-blasts-dea-asks-why-major-investigation-into-epstein-never-led-to-charges.html

[mercuryblues]

11. To me, the big question is where did all that unaccounted money go?

My guess is the orange glowworm got a hefty amount of it.

[ancianita]

12. Important. Thank you. Bookmarking.

[purr-rat beauty]

13. That explains it

The true Deep State

[Attilatheblond]

55. Or, as I often call it: The War Lords

cuz we live in very dark ages and governments are just window dressing

[jmowreader]

14. I just did a somewhat interesting analysis of his shell entities

The eight shell entities at the center of Epstein's money laundering scheme are listed, along with their imbalance in inflow and outflow, below:

More inflow than outflow:
Southern Trust Company: $49.1M
Southern Financial: $412.3M
2017 Caterpillar Trust: $15.0M
Total imbalance: $476.4M

More outflow than inflow:
Haze Trust: $79.9M
Plan D: $9.5M
Gratitude America: $31.0M
Jeepers Inc: $155.6M
BV70: $101.5M
Total imbalance: $376.6M

Unaccounted-for money: $99.8M

Here's what I'm thinking: Entity A took in the dirty cash. An "Entity B" not listed here picked it up and moved it to "Entity C," and when Entity C gets rid of the money it's clean, pressed,. starched and has nice crisp creases in it.

Somewhere between Entity A and Entity C, someone skimmed damn near $100 million. I suspect it was Epstein.

This throws a huge wrench into the "Trump had Epstein murdered to keep him from telling the feds who Trump was playing Hide the Mushroom with" theory. If Epstein stole $100 million from people he was laundering money for, there are plenty of people with both the motivation and the means to have him killed in jail. It's still thoroughly possible that Trump is the responsible individual but he's no longer the only candidate.

The one name I don't see In this report, and kinda expect to, is Donald Trump. How many layers of insulation did Trump have between himself and Epstein's network?

[ColoringFool]

18. John Barron.

[wnylib]

19. I am not a financial type of person.

So my guess is based on personality types and their behavior.

I think that you don't see Trump's name because he is a two bit player trying to hob nob with pros. He's like a Chihuahua trying to run with a pack of Rottweilers, constantly yapping to sound tough and important.

Trump's association with this pack is/was mostly as a begger getting bailed out from his financial failures. Along the way he learned to capitalize on his tendency to fail, using failures for benefits like tax write offs. We know that he had financial dealings with Deutsche Bank, which is named in the OP analysis. He might have done some minor laundering for the big guys through his Trump corporation.

Mostly, he was/is owned by the big time criminals due to financial dependence on them. My guess is that they decided to back him in becoming leader of the powerful US where his talent for melodramatic theatrical cons were/are useful to them on promoting their agendas.

[Ferrets are Cool]

28. Bingo

[Lonestarblue]

33. Trump has used John Barron as an alias. He may have used another alias we don't know about.

Trump would have been all over any easy and corrupt way to make money.

[wnylib]

40. Yes, but Trump is a two bit loser trying to convince

himself and everyone else that he is a powerful winner.

He knows the people in Epstein's circle, and has had dealings with them, but I think that he is not smart and successful enough to be a big player among them.

[TommyT139]

29. Maybe Trump's name is in unreleased documents?

This gentleman did the analysis on what was made public. Is it likely that not all of the financial papers were released, or that there simply are gaps in what is present in the whole collection?

But then if so, how would the author have been able to put as much together as he did?

[k55f5r]

45. $99m is the cost of the laundry.

Nothing for free. Nothing.

[calimary]

48. Indeed! I looked for it, too!

It wasn’t listed - at least anywhere that I looked.

Conveniently enough.

[questionseverything]

50. I don't think he had to steal the hundred million bucks,

I imagine the hundred million was his pay for laundrying the billion

[malaise]

15. K & R

Huge

[yellow dahlia]

20. So huge!

[Wonder Why]

16. That person deserves the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the highest reward in the country.

Those murdered by ICE also deserve it posthumously.

[yellow dahlia]

21. Thank you for sharing - important stuff!

[oldmanlynn]

22. Where is trump? Are they still hiding his involvement

[Bluetus]

27. We know that he did some of th emoney laundering with real estate transactions

They wouldn't necessarily be in his name if he received the payments at arm's length. Plus he has a million corporations.

Nonetheless, every one of these transactions should be investigated.

[Joinfortmill]

23. Thank you for posting. Unbelievable, just unfing-believable.

The more we learn, the more questions arise. The amount of money changing hands was unfathomable. Hundreds of millions of dollars moving back and forth from banks, to trusts, to individuals. What was Epstein actually doing?

[DET]

25. Impressive

Excellent presentation, easy to follow even for a financial dunce like me.

Why hasn’t this kind of analysis been done before, especially if the underlying data is publicly available?

[NJCher]

59. analysis

Why hasn’t this kind of analysis been done before, especially if the underlying data is publicly available?

My guesses:

1) extensive time commitment to do the analysis and enter it into spreadsheets
2) ability to do such an analysis: what legislator would be able to train an analyst? And furthermore, where would they get the money to do so?
That's just for starters. Other reasons might occur to me.

[Exp]

26. Holy SMOKES! K&R !!!!!!!!!!!

[Farmer-Rick]

31. Well that sent me down a rabbit hole

That Debra Black along with her money bags husband Leon were very busy little criminals, prospering from child abuse.

Behind every great fortune is a great crime. Debra and Leon Black made big money off the pedos and the children.

[Nevilledog]

41. Trump put their son in his administration, Ben Black. He's "repurposing" USAID funds.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/02/26/who-is-ben-black-trump-nominee-and-son-of-billionaire-wants-to-repurpose-usaid-funds/

No paywall link
https://archive.li/xXCm1

[Clouds Passing]

32. Nutlick at the core of this

[BlueMTexpat]

35. WTF! Noam Chomsky!!

Not a name that I expected to see!

[niyad]

38. And to the tune of some $2million. I was surprised, to say the least,

when I saw his correspondence with that monster, and now this. His whole life's work and reputation deservedly down the drain.

[calimary]

49. Indeed.

It just lowered a big icky black cloud over his name, life’s work, AND reputation!

I guess that old joke about “we know what you are. Now we’re just haggling over the price” becomes all too real (once AGAIN, dammit!!!).

[niyad]

58. His remarks about "the hysteria that has developed about the abuse

of women. . ." destroyed the last iota of respect I might have retained for his work.

[BlueMTexpat]

62. I didn't see

that remark. Now I'll be thoroughly revetting!

[niyad]

63. That remark was a quote from the Guardian article I referenced in post 57.

The entire artticle was a real eye-opener, as were several others I read when I googled "chomsky epstein relationship".

[BlueMTexpat]

64. Thanks for letting me know!

[niyad]

65. You are most welcome. Let me know what you think.

[snot]

52. Note:

Epstein provided investment or other financial services to many people, I believe including Chomsky. No one has suggested that Chomsky took part in any sexual or illegal activities.

[niyad]

57. Before you continue in that defensive vein, you might want to read

The Guardian article from Feb 3 of this year by Ramon Antonio Vargas, detailing their friendship up to epstein's death, "Newly released files show close relationship between comsky and epstein". And consider chomsky's comments comments about the "hysteria that has developed about the abuse of women. . .", amoung other misogynist remarks. It is quite clear from the exchanges quoted in the article that their clearly close relationship involved more than financial advice.

[snot]

67. I've read the article, thanks;

but I still see no evidence that Chomsky ever participated in any improper conduct or that he knew of the extent of Epstein's crimes.

Epstein traded in contacts and favors under the guise of friendship. He went out of his way to cultivate interesting or important people from all walks of life, partly because he was able to them use them as lures for other important people – e.g., inviting someone to dinner and mentioning that Chomsky or Stephen Hawking or some other figure would also be there.

I don't believe in guilt by association.

[niyad]

68. You say you read the article, and yet you still insist their

relationship was purely financial. We must have read two entirely different articles then, so there is no point in continuing.

[BlueMTexpat]

61. I believe you.

But I was still shocked to see his name!

[live love laugh]

36. How do you know a link is safe? I'm wary at this point....

[Attilatheblond]

56. Jot it down on paper and take it to a library

use a public access computer and try it there.

[niyad]

37. KNR and bookmarking for later.

[leftstreet]

44. DURec

[UTUSN]

47. K&R

[ultralite001]

51. Where is the info on Epstein's COUQ Foundation???

http://www.jeffreyepsteinscience.com/about-jeffrey-epstein

https://gvwire.com/2026/02/10/epstein-used-cash-to-wield-his-influence-at-columbia-and-nyu/

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2026/2/9/what-were-jeffrey-epsteins-links-to-israel

[Faux pas]

53. Kickin'