General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSSJVegeta
(2,714 posts)OAITW r.2.0
(31,960 posts)IMHO
SSJVegeta
(2,714 posts)Celerity
(54,099 posts)Now we need the christofash crim Paxton to win the Rethug run-off over Cornyn and we just might win the Senate seat (Talarico v Paxton was the ideal match-up before the voting started).
Enter stage left
(4,481 posts)Anybody know?
LeftInTX
(34,069 posts)All of the congressional seats now have a general election candidate or are heading into a runoff.
JT45242
(3,987 posts)I remember that being a big deal. Or is that only for federal and state office?
Texas residents?
Deuxcents
(26,433 posts)Marie Marie
(11,158 posts)They both had such a way with simple language projecting a powerful message. We need them both back in Washington.
ananda
(34,788 posts)She would have to change districts and
run in that primary.
Coventina
(29,580 posts)Per MS NOW discussion earlier.
Frasier Balzov
(5,008 posts)A senator's chief of staff's salary is almost as much as the senator's salary.
The two of them together could be a powerful joint force advancing legislative policy objectives if they see those objectives in essentially the same way.
Is this practical? Or do they hate each other's guts? I certainly hope not.
MichMan
(17,018 posts)LeftInTX
(34,069 posts)niyad
(131,514 posts)with national visibility to being an invisible staffer? Do you have any idea how sexist and offensive that sounds, whatever your actual intentions with that post may be?
Frasier Balzov
(5,008 posts)If Crockett has lost, then what will be her visibility?
Will she campaign for him and be a media surrogate for him?
That would be great! But then what of her future after November?
If Talarico wins the seat, I think the offer should at least be made.
Whoever he might otherwise have in mind for the job can't possibly be as big help to him and the People of Texas as Jasmine Crockett would be.
Unless she litigates her primary loss and the two of them end up hating each other's guts.
Skittles
(170,877 posts)NOPE
Cha
(318,301 posts)Future...She's a Strong Voice For Our Democracy!
Orangepeel
(13,978 posts)Part of why she ran for Senate
H2O Man
(78,921 posts)MichMan
(17,018 posts)Not sure of the rules in Texas
Brother Buzz
(39,824 posts)Current as of January 01, 2024 | Updated by Findlaw Staff
(a) A person who voted at a primary election or who was a candidate for nomination in a primary is ineligible for a place on the ballot for the succeeding general election for state and county officers as:
(1) an independent candidate for an office for which a candidate was nominated in the primary; or
(2) the nominee of a political party other than the party holding the primary in which the person voted or was a candidate.
(b) A person who was a candidate for nomination in a primary election is ineligible for a place on the list of write-in candidates for the succeeding general election for state and county officers as a write-in candidate for the office sought by that candidate in the primary.
MichMan
(17,018 posts)LeftInTX
(34,069 posts)Pisces
(6,195 posts)Melon
(1,390 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(178,272 posts)Crockett ran for senate because she was gerrymandered out You can not run for two positions at the same time in Texas
karynnj
(60,894 posts)Witnessof Trump
(8 posts)No more to be seen.
Celerity
(54,099 posts)thought crime
(1,454 posts)She could do very well in primary debates.
Celerity
(54,099 posts)I see very little chance we risk nominating a female POTUS candidate for the 3rd time in the last 4 cycles. The US is simply too misogynistic atm.
Also, the US deep racism and religious bias (against non Christians) needs to be taken into account. Same for homophobia (especially against gay men, as lesbians tend to have easier times getting elected now).
As for VP, she presents a chance to become a focal point of attacks from the right designed to scare off swing voters, moderates, centrists, white suburbanites, etc, which breaks the old rule number 1 for VP chosing (do no harm).
On election night 2024, when it was clear that Harris had lost, I predicted 2 white, straight, centre left Christian males as our 2028 ticket.
As a mixed race (genetic WWIII in a human body, lol: mum is a Bajan (Barbados) mixed race black/etc West Indian, plus white Swedish (my father is 100 per cent Swede), Han Chinese, Lebanese, Sephardic Portuguese Jewish, East Indian, etc), lesbian, atheist, social democratic (NOT democratic socialist) type progressive female, that prediction pains me, but I am nothing if not a realist and pragmatic when it comes to my predictions and what is needed to win in a fucked up Trumpian-inflected splintered national electoral ecosphere.
Crockett comes with more inherent risk than potential gain IMHO.
Same for AOC and a 2028 POTUS run. Hopefully she runs for Schumer's NY Senate seat in 2028, whether he runs for re-election again or not, as she is blocked from House leadership by the moderate/centrist/conservative Dem caucuses (with help as of late, sadly, from the retiring Pelosi). Some of groups (and individual members of them) detest AOC, like many in the extraordinarily problematic (on many issues and stances) No Labels-spawned Problem Solvers Caucus.
That all said, I absolutely respect a differing opinion in regards to my predictions.
Cheers,
Cel
oasis
(53,525 posts)politics.
Skittles
(170,877 posts)sure, bro
Witnessof Trump
(8 posts)Bro
Skittles
(170,877 posts)they would very much have preferred Crockett so they could pull their usual racist, misogynist bullshit