I'll just drop this here. Do with it as you like.

[AverageOldGuy]

The Second Amendment is interpreted by the NRA as a safeguard granting the unlimited ownership of firearms by the citizenry thereby ensuring that if government becomes abusive, destructive, or tyrannical, citizens have the firepower to defend their liberty.

[displacedvermoter]

1. They (NRA) get much more worked up about

the imagined tyrannical or abusive conduct of Democratic candidates (especially when they are Black or women) than the actual product from white neo fascists. Can't figure that out.

[mopinko]

3. cuz it was always bullshit. a good cover story to tell the masses.

the truth is they’re just greedy assholes funded by russia.

[displacedvermoter]

5. Yup...

[biophile]

2. I have always agreed with that

I don’t have a gun though. Guess I better get one 😏

[Wednesdays]

4. "...citizens have the firepower to defend their liberty"

[Jack Valentino]

10. Ironically a 'trans-friendly' gunman made a better choice of firearm,

since he actually succeeded at eliminating his 'target'.....

[amerikat]

6. A well regulated militia...

They always seem to ignore that part.

[Bayard]

7. Indeed

It was meant to apply to defense against a foreign nation invasion, not a free for all.

[rubbersole]

8. And Washington couldn't afford a standing army.

The 2nd Amendment never said every Rickybobby could have a gun. Even a muzzle loader single shot. But I digress...

[Jack Valentino]

9. I suppose that Thomas Crooks agreed with that principle....

I only wish that he had better aim, or had chosen a better weapon for the job.....

[TalenaGor]

11. only if its democrats

[BidenRocks]

12. Two shooting ranges today.

I couldn't get a parking spot at either. One indoor, one outdoor.
Maybe mid week.