Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Real Stakes Behind California's Billionaire Tax Fight: Health Care Access by Mark Kreidler

Just as Californias billionaires would prefer, the public conversation around a proposed one-time tax on a fraction of their immense wealth has become centered on a single threat: Theyll leave and take their money with them if the tax passes.
Its a wild notion unsupported by history, but you can expect to hear more about it all the way to the Nov. 3 general election. That is partly because the billionaires themselves are spending huge in an effort to defeat the measurewith some of the largest contributions coming from those, like Google co-founder Sergey Brin, who claim theyve already fled the state.
But there is another piece of the conversation that consistently isnt getting enough attention here. It is the question of what Californias health care landscape will look like in the face of the Trump administrations wholesale attack on Medicaid and the deep funding cuts that followreductions that revenues from the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act are meant to partly offset.
Increasingly, that landscape appears treacherous. And as recent comments from the CEO of one of Southern Californias most prominent nonprofit health systems make clear, the fallout will hit the states most vulnerable residents the hardest.
The house of cards didnt just weaken, Chris Van Gorder, president and CEO of San Diego-based nonprofit Scripps Health, said in an essay posted to the health care industry site Beckers Hospital Review. It collapsed.
Its a wild notion unsupported by history, but you can expect to hear more about it all the way to the Nov. 3 general election. That is partly because the billionaires themselves are spending huge in an effort to defeat the measurewith some of the largest contributions coming from those, like Google co-founder Sergey Brin, who claim theyve already fled the state.
But there is another piece of the conversation that consistently isnt getting enough attention here. It is the question of what Californias health care landscape will look like in the face of the Trump administrations wholesale attack on Medicaid and the deep funding cuts that followreductions that revenues from the 2026 Billionaire Tax Act are meant to partly offset.
Increasingly, that landscape appears treacherous. And as recent comments from the CEO of one of Southern Californias most prominent nonprofit health systems make clear, the fallout will hit the states most vulnerable residents the hardest.
The house of cards didnt just weaken, Chris Van Gorder, president and CEO of San Diego-based nonprofit Scripps Health, said in an essay posted to the health care industry site Beckers Hospital Review. It collapsed.
https://prospect.org/2026/05/22/real-stakes-californias-billionaire-tax-fight-health-care-access/
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Real Stakes Behind California's Billionaire Tax Fight: Health Care Access by Mark Kreidler (Original Post)
justaprogressive
8 hrs ago
OP
Van Gorder opposes single payer healthcare. I argued with him about it.
travelingthrulife
8 hrs ago
#1
travelingthrulife
(5,611 posts)1. Van Gorder opposes single payer healthcare. I argued with him about it.
He said, "it would end healthcare as we know it." I said, I know, that's the idea.
They are only interested in building healthcare empires.
MichMan
(17,416 posts)2. Why is it only a one time tax, preventing it from ever being imposed again if needed?
Is it actually expected to bring in enough revenue to last for the foreseeable future?