General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie Sanders is on CNN NOW......and he's got new glasses........he is saying the US population should get at least
50% of the profits of the AI companies!!!!! Gawd I love him.
WSHazel
(869 posts)The AI companies, other than the chip makers and some data center builders, are unlikely to see any profits. Ever.
MadameButterfly
(4,204 posts)Please enlighten me further.
WSHazel
(869 posts)He is shredding AI on his blog and YouTube.
1) it is not intelligent. Current AI is a really good search engine, but it is not intelligent. It is not thinking. This limits its productive use.
2) it is insanely expensive to run. The amount of compute power needed to run a simple dialogue with the AI engine can eat up a monthly subscription in about an hour, depending on the complexity.
3) The entire supply chain is based on absurdly huge demand projections that would make AI 2-3x the current software industry. Why would people buy that much given its technological limitations?
4) Nvidia and others are stuffing their supply chains. They have already shipped more GPUs then could be installed this year.
5) The data centers (think Google Cloud, Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services, Oracle) are buying the chips/GPUs, and many data centers have been announced but havent been started. A data centers profitability is based on massive government subsidies, and there has been a bipartisan revolt against them by people. There needs to be a lot more data centers for AI to achieve profitability, and building has slowed down.
6) Circular deals - GPU buying has slowed, so Nvidia and others are paying OpenAI and Anthropic to buy Nvidia chips by buying stock in OpenAI and Anthropic. Amazon and Microsoft are doing similar with their data centers. This is a really bad sign, because it points out that the AI software companies are nowhere close to cash flow positive, but VCs are not willing to fill the breach. The vast majority of investors funding AI are able to treat that investment as revenue, thereby inflating their own stock price.
This is about a third of the problems with AI economics.
If any part of this slows down, the entire ecosystem, which has been carrying the stock market since 2022, starts to have serious problems.
rurallib
(64,871 posts)WSHazel
(869 posts)Zitron is the most concise in his analysis and most frequent speaker, but there are many others raising concerns. Mark Cuban, Jamie Dimon, others.
MadameButterfly
(4,204 posts)Which is exactly why on the advice of a friend in the business I bought 1000 shares of Nvidia at the beginning of 2023 for a little over $14,000. As of todays statement from Edward Jones, its worth a little over $224,000. I should mention that includes at least one split. The chipmakers are where the money is.
DFW
(60,545 posts)Since I was already traveling like a whirlwind for my job, I hardly paid any attention to any such advice from a broker. But this one time I did. I bought 1000 shares of Texas Instruments at $54. In the first eight years, it split two-for-one three times, so now I had eight thousand shares. It went up to over $75, but during the Cheney-Bush recession of 2008, it went down to $20. I asked the (now new) broker if I shouldnt buy more? She said no, too many eggs in one basket. Great advice THAT was, right? Its now over $300. At least I kept the rest. Like I said, I paid little attention to this game. I pay even less now. There seems little sense in selling for a big profit when well over half of it will be gobbled up by two different governments. Im better off leaving it to my NY-based daughter, who would only be taxed once on it. My Germany-based daughter has made so much money already that she doesnt want anything from me anyway (she, or her kids, will get some despite that), since she has probably already made more than I ever will.
Betty Boom
(473 posts)Its been fun watching it grow. I dont plan on touching it. I have a tendency to just hold on when it comes to the stocks part of my portfolio. The market goes up. The market comes down. The market goes back up.
DFW
(60,545 posts)I dont even know the German tax rate for capital gains, or even if they have such a category. Way back when, such gains were labeled speculative gains and completely exempt from taxation in Germany. At the onset of the war-damaged Federal Republic, I guess this made sense, as the government was desperate to encourage the population to invest. Now that investing in the stock market here is almost as routine as it is in the States, the government has decided, hey, we want some of that! But I havent bought or sold any stock since I became a full-time German resident, so I havent bothered to find out. Outside of our two yearly trips to the USA together, we really dont live an opulent life, so we still live within our means despite my 73% income tax (between Germany and the USA).
If circumstances change, and I should need to sell some stock, I guess Ill find out quickly what the effect would be.
Celerity
(55,103 posts)snip
Capital gains from financial investments (e.g. sale of shares) are subject to a flat tax rate of 25% plus 5.5% solidarity surcharge (in total 26.375%, plus church tax if applicable), which is generally withheld at source automatically upon distribution of the gains. Related expenses cannot be deducted. Capital gains qualify for the 'investor's allowance' of EUR 1,000 per taxpayer and year for the total of all financial investment income. This amount is doubled in the case of married taxpayers filing jointly. Special rules apply on the taxation of capital gains from the sale of a significant interest in a corporation (1% or more).
Special partial tax exemptions apply on capital gains from the sale of mutual funds units, depending on the nature of the fund.
Other capital gains are taxable in Germany at individual progressive rates only if the sale is within one year (for movable assets) or ten years (for real property) after the purchase date. Since 2024, these capital gains are only taxable if the profit exceeds EUR 1,000 (previously EUR 600) per year in total. Further tax relief may be applicable under specific conditions if the property was used for private purposes.
Hassin Bin Sober
(27,514 posts)W_HAMILTON
(10,456 posts)betsuni
(29,363 posts)But at least then people would've caught on that "democratic socialism" revolution means regulated capitalism, same as liberal Democratic policies (FDR/LBJ) and there isn't any ideological difference except for strategy. There could've been unity and progress.
mvd
(65,970 posts)Of course, no one has to love Bernie. But I dont have to like the centrist direction of the party, either.
Rob H.
(5,955 posts)MadameButterfly
(4,204 posts)and I can't practice my profession. And if there aren't any more artists because who can compete?
They have to stop the theft.
Betty Boom
(473 posts)All the buggy whip factories are still out of business.
AZ8theist
(7,693 posts)...new orders are gonna come in any day now!!
The President said we're the hottest country on the planet!!
New business is pouring in!!! Prices down 6, 7, 800 PERCENT!!
MadameButterfly
(4,204 posts)is not the same as replacing art made by humans with art made by machines. Machines which cannot make art without stealing from past and current human artists.
I'm speaking for artists but it's not the only field where human input and human activity should not be eliminated.
I support Bernie's idea; but it only addresses part of the problem. It's not just about the money. It's about what kind of world we want to live in.
WSHazel
(869 posts)AI is probably one of the most absurd investment bubbles ever created.
Emile
(43,603 posts)Andrew Yang, a former Democratic presidential candidate, proposed a universal basic income of $1,000 per month
calimary
(91,058 posts)a kennedy
(36,512 posts)OMGAWD, I feel a movement!!!!? And I totally,have forgotten about Andrew Wang
a kennedy
(36,512 posts)Seriously love both these men. How do we get them on the 2028 ticket????
DFW
(60,545 posts)The exploratory committee for the Republican ticket of Donald Trump, Jr. and Eric Trump (otherwise known as Trump and Gump 2028 ) would surely be willing to back such run with a few dozen million in secret PAC money. Anything if it might split the Democratic vote in a year when we should otherwise have a cakewalk to (whatever is left of) the White House.
gulliver
(14,122 posts)At least he has some clue about AI being important. His take is pathetic, but at least he is saying something.
state of stupid
(217 posts)are going to be replaced by automation and robots, do not go looking for a job that
could be replaced by automation and robots, look for a job fixing the automation and
robots. With all the speculation of no need for humans to work because AI is going to
replace you; then why do I need to live since it would appear I am no longer needed?
The longer I live, the more I think that these assholes that think that way are people
that really need to be locked up someplace where they cannot be a threat to mankind.
Emile
(43,603 posts)state of stupid
(217 posts)decide what we will be doing to earn a living having been replaced by machines?
Matthew28
(1,901 posts)To make sure everyone lives without fear of homelessness, hunger or poverty ever again in this country.
Blue Full Moon
(3,703 posts)40 plus years to prepare which wasn't done. This from Alan Watts has been the plan so far.