General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMamdani is now a PROVEN king maker
What excuse will the Establishment media come up w/today?
They'll start w/'this can only work in NYC", then they'll shift to "something, something, something not good for the generals."
Personally, I'm over the moon. Let's keep this momentum going baby.
Platner, you're up next!
RandySF
(87,811 posts)lapucelle
(21,226 posts)Mamdani is personally wealthy enough to settle down on the UWS, the UES, in lower Manhattan, or in gentrified Brooklyn. That would put him up against Lander or Lasher for a congressional seat.
Should Mamdani choose to return to his rent stabilized apartment in Queens, that would put him up against AOC, who declined to endorse in any of the NYC primaries.
As Rachel Maddow would say, watch this space.
QueerDuck
(2,111 posts)Labeling anyone a single "kingmaker" completely diminishes the incredible work of the candidates themselves, their staff, and the volunteers who knocked on doors. --- Did Mamdani's endorsement provide a helpful signal to progressive voters? Sure. But he didn't cast the ballots.
These weren't easy, standard races where an endorsement just rubber-stamps an obvious winnerthey were tough, hard-fought campaigns. These candidates won because they ran aggressive, disciplined grassroots operations that tapped into real voter dissatisfaction.
Why would anyone want to reduce a complex, organized movement down to one guy playing kingmaker? The credit actually belongs to the people who ran and the voters who showed up.
OldBaldy1701E
(11,788 posts)QueerDuck
(2,111 posts)Emile
(44,068 posts)RandySF
(87,811 posts)a moderate former mayor took 60% against a field of progressive (including one endorsed by Bernie) in Salt Lake City. A moderate combat vet was nominated in the NY 17th. A Chevalier would not beat a Republican in Nassau or Putnam.
Lonestarblue
(13,636 posts)democrank
(12,732 posts)Credit should go to the hard-working candidates, their home-hitting messages and the volunteers.
I believe our country is preparing for change
.not just a new leader, but a very new way of being.
3_Limes
(613 posts)Let's give this a minute, shall we?
Celerity
(55,324 posts)
Mayor Zohran Mamdani and his allies swept a series of congressional primaries in New York City on Tuesday in a remarkable show of strength for the insurgent left that sent shock waves through the Democratic Party.
Mr. Mamdanis candidates toppled a pair of incumbents backed by the citys political establishment, including major labor unions and the House Democratic leader. Another candidate backed by the mayor won an open House seat, and a handful of democratic socialist challengers he supported were winning down the ballot.
For months, Mr. Mamdani threw himself and his energized political organization into the three marquee congressional contests, campaigning late into the night in the races final days and calling the election a referendum on the direction of the party.
All the winning candidates share Mr. Mamdanis progressive economic platform, and they each ran campaigns that focused intently on ending American support for Israel, a sign of how far public opinion has shifted on the issue, even in New York.
snip
QueerDuck
(2,111 posts)... Argumentum ad Verecundiam. But, whatever.
Celerity
(55,324 posts)another example (thus my use of 'FWIW' in my reply) of the term being employed in re Mamdani.
Also, as I type this, MS Now has also used the term twice (by two different people) a few seconds ago, again FWIW.
But you do you.
QueerDuck
(2,111 posts)MakeThemCry
(41 posts)Said that they supported her because of Mamdani.
If that isn't kingmaker, then I don't know what that is.
Mamdani has rejuvenated the Democratic Party.
Give him his props, he deserves it.
JT45242
(4,226 posts)Unless we get really clear exit polling results, it will be hard to draw any conclusions.
Remember that all politics are local.
Not sure what to read of primary elections in general as they tell you about the most passionate voters who are in a party. Usually, the unaffiliated independent voters swing the election.
orangecrush
(31,819 posts)3Hotdogs
(15,721 posts)Anatolia Mejia was elected in a special election in February.
muriel_volestrangler
(106,825 posts)You might claim that a House representative is more powerful than the Mayor of New York City, but I think most would disagree.
The more appropriate political cliche here is "he has strong coattails".
mvd
(65,982 posts)I cant remember a better mayor there than Mamdani. As long as the candidates can win, and they will, this is great news.
FascismIsDeath
(311 posts)Raven123
(8,036 posts)A recently elected popular mayor endorses candidates in specific races in areas where he is popular. They win. Not a surprise.
Autumn
(49,036 posts)He seems to have big coat tails in NY and a lot of people not in NY are sure taking notice and paying attention.
karynnj
(61,217 posts)that was also partly responsible for his own win. (helped of course by the corruption of Adams and the sleaziness of Cuomo)
Someone like Mamdani can bring people to consider a candidate, but the candidate has to make the actual "sale".
It seems that urban centers are moving to democratic socialists. Living in Burlington, Vermont, I remember a rabbi mentioning that Bernie Sanders, a good friend of his, should mention FDR rather than Denmark, Sweden etc.
With affordability being an ever larger issue for all but the top 1 percent, we could, especially in the high cost cities, be in somewhat similar times to the times when FDR and his people worked to create a safety net for vulnerable people.
It may be that people like Mamdani are a revision back to the policies of FDR.