General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhat does Graham's death and McConnell's absence mean for the Democratic agenda in the Senate?
It's got to be helpful for them, I think.
TheProle
(4,254 posts)dem4decades
(14,762 posts)wcmagumba
(7,156 posts)lamp_shade
(15,560 posts)J_William_Ryan
(3,720 posts)Nope.
Two hard-core red states both will be replaced by Republicans.
onenote
(46,518 posts)Repubs still control the Senate, 51-47. They set the agenda, decide whether a bill moves. There have been very few bills passed this Congress where the outcome would have been different without Graham and McConnell available to vote.
appmanga
(1,609 posts)...and while Graham could be quickly replaced, I would think it wouldn't happen that quickly in a state with an outgoing governor with something this big to leverage.
onenote
(46,518 posts)There were 53 repubs and 47 Democrats, including the two independents that vote with the Democrats. Without McConnell and Graham, its 51-47 Fetterman actually is an unreliable vote for the Democrats, so one could argue that it's closer to 52-46. And while some claim that Cornyn and Cassidy aren't reliable votes for the republicans, there is no evidence that they will start supporting Democrats or Democratic positions.
appmanga
(1,609 posts)...but I see you've clarified that. In any case, this Senate isn't going to be doing much for the next few months.
onenote
(46,518 posts)But they have 22 more after the election and can do a lot of damage in that lame duck session.
GoodRaisin
(11,241 posts)Things are looking up for democrats.
Blue Owl
(60,289 posts)MineralMan
(152,181 posts)For now, though, it's irrelevant. Get to work flipping seats in your own state. That's what matters.