Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

lapucelle

(21,410 posts)
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 08:18 AM 14 hrs ago

Hypothetical questions: Shouldn't a politician currently running in a primary for high office

at least have known what policies their state had actually implemented several years prior to the original complaint, before continuing to complain that their state needed to implement those policies?

And if that politician is asked about that previous on-the-record stance, shouldn't they simply admit that they jumped on a bandwagon because it seemed popular at the time, instead of dissembling by insisting that a word doesn't mean what it quite literally means?

And shouldn't all candidates follow FEC rules and release their financials because voters have a right to know?

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Hypothetical questions: Shouldn't a politician currently running in a primary for high office (Original Post) lapucelle 14 hrs ago OP
I hear what you're saying. You make a good point! QueerDuck 14 hrs ago #1
????? Wiz Imp 14 hrs ago #2
We The People expect so little from politicians, precisely because the system Owners demand so much lostnfound 13 hrs ago #3
can you give us a clue what you are referring to? MadameButterfly 13 hrs ago #4
There are a lot of politicians, and many appear on the Sunday shows. lapucelle 13 hrs ago #5

QueerDuck

(2,518 posts)
1. I hear what you're saying. You make a good point!
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 08:24 AM
14 hrs ago

"Theoretically" this should be true, eh?

lostnfound

(17,726 posts)
3. We The People expect so little from politicians, precisely because the system Owners demand so much
Mon Jul 13, 2026, 09:02 AM
13 hrs ago

I don’t even know who you are alluding to, but the question answers itself.Yes of course they should at least know what policies their state had actually implemented, and of course they should be candid and not cover for their lack of knowledge by gaslighting about it.

I often ask myself, would I want the life of an elected official? Heck no. Almost all of them have to spend their time fundraising (unless they are the ones who simply sign a blank check with the devil so that the campaign funds come rolling in like a retainer fee or a second salary.) .
If you’re not in the devil’s payroll, you’ve got to build a brand, build networks, fundraise, and schmooze with the small handfuls of rich-enough people willing to back you with little or no financial ROI. If they excel at those things, they may not be spending much time doing their research.

I suspect that an extraordinarily talented progressive like AOC manages to keep conscience clean AND get funds from a wide swath of idealistic supporters. Likewise, the extraordinarily talented Obama threaded a needle and had the thuggish though highly skilled Rahm to help remove obstacles and keep the snakes away. Both of them also do their research.

Getting to high office in this country’s current political condition is like trying to win an election among the residents of hell and of purgatory. (An apt analogy since half of the country cannot let go of their hate and the other half are tormented by waiting for a kinder and gentler world.) Hell has already done a hostile takeover of nearly all of the major media C-suites.

Integrity is most important but so is electability.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hypothetical questions: S...