New York appeals court denies Trump's bid to halt Friday's hush money sentencing
Source: ABC News
January 9, 2025, 9:19 AM
The New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in the state, has denied President-elect Donald Trump's request to halt his sentencing Friday in his criminal hush money case.
Trump on Wednesday launched an eleventh-hour request to New York's highest court to pause the hush money case, on the same day that he also asked the U.S. Supreme Court to halt his sentencing.
Prosecutors with the Manhattan district attorney's office argued in a Thursday morning filing, before the court made its ruling, that Trump's argument to delay his sentencing rests on an "utterly baseless" concept of president-elect immunity.
Responding to Trump's argument, lawyers for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg urged the New York Court of Appeals to reject Trump's request for a delay because a president-elect does not benefit from the immunity reserved for the sitting president.
Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-claim-immunity-halt-fridays-hush-money-sentencing/story?id=117502080
Just breaking.
Updated source.
Original article/headline/source -
Thu, January 9, 2025 at 9:42 AM EST
NEW YORK (AP) -- New York's highest appeals court won't block Trump's sentencing in hush money case. The Supreme Court has yet to rule.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/yorks-highest-appeals-court-wont-144243918.html
Marthe48
(19,623 posts)And if they give a f.f. about their 'respect' they better leave it alone now.
Walleye
(36,898 posts)Im pretty sure there was nothing in the campaign about taking over Greenland and Canada and the Panama Canal. So Americans didnt vote for that either
mdbl
(5,562 posts)Just more evidence of their bias and disregard for established law.
onenote
(44,874 posts)The application was filed with Sotomayor. She had the following options: deny it summarily, grant it summarily, or ask for NY to respond. If she had denied it summarily, Trump could have re-filed with another Justice. She made the correct move.
LetMyPeopleVote
(156,461 posts)ScratchCat
(2,510 posts)LOL!! I guess that's how she signs all letters, but that is hilarious here.
This was his attempt to sue the judge. The court isn't entertaining nonsense. Its not even smoke and mirrors; its legal nonsense.
endgenocide
(141 posts)maybe he'll get a text about the denial, that'll wake his old ass up!
NikoGriego
(5 posts)Hush Money or Election Interference?
Why is it continually called the "hush money" case when it really should be called the "election interference" case? He was interfering with the election by paying off the porn star to not speak about their tryst. Simple.