Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(145,402 posts)
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 09:58 AM Jan 9

New York appeals court denies Trump's bid to halt Friday's hush money sentencing

Source: ABC News

January 9, 2025, 9:19 AM


The New York Court of Appeals, the highest court in the state, has denied President-elect Donald Trump's request to halt his sentencing Friday in his criminal hush money case.

Trump on Wednesday launched an eleventh-hour request to New York's highest court to pause the hush money case, on the same day that he also asked the U.S. Supreme Court to halt his sentencing.

Prosecutors with the Manhattan district attorney's office argued in a Thursday morning filing, before the court made its ruling, that Trump's argument to delay his sentencing rests on an "utterly baseless" concept of president-elect immunity.

Responding to Trump's argument, lawyers for Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg urged the New York Court of Appeals to reject Trump's request for a delay because a president-elect does not benefit from the immunity reserved for the sitting president.

Read more: https://abcnews.go.com/US/trump-claim-immunity-halt-fridays-hush-money-sentencing/story?id=117502080



Just breaking.

Updated source.

Original article/headline/source -

New York's highest appeals court won't block Trump's sentencing in hush money case. The Supreme Court has yet to rule

Thu, January 9, 2025 at 9:42 AM EST

NEW YORK (AP) -- New York's highest appeals court won't block Trump's sentencing in hush money case. The Supreme Court has yet to rule.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/yorks-highest-appeals-court-wont-144243918.html
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Marthe48

(19,623 posts)
1. In other times the s.c. had no say
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 10:03 AM
Jan 9

And if they give a f.f. about their 'respect' they better leave it alone now.



Walleye

(36,898 posts)
2. A corrupt president with his own personal Supreme Court. Is this what Americans voted for?
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 10:05 AM
Jan 9

I’m pretty sure there was nothing in the campaign about taking over Greenland and Canada and the Panama Canal. So Americans didn’t vote for that either

mdbl

(5,562 posts)
3. Again the SCROTUS accepts a case it should have rejected outright
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 10:06 AM
Jan 9

Just more evidence of their bias and disregard for established law.

onenote

(44,874 posts)
7. Sotomayor asked for a response. Standard operating procedure.
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 11:04 AM
Jan 9

The application was filed with Sotomayor. She had the following options: deny it summarily, grant it summarily, or ask for NY to respond. If she had denied it summarily, Trump could have re-filed with another Justice. She made the correct move.

LetMyPeopleVote

(156,461 posts)
4. Breaking: NY Court of Appeals denies Donald Trump's request to halt sentencing in hush money case.
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 10:13 AM
Jan 9

This makes me smile



ScratchCat

(2,510 posts)
6. "Very Truly Yours"
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 11:01 AM
Jan 9

LOL!! I guess that's how she signs all letters, but that is hilarious here.

This was his attempt to sue the judge. The court isn't entertaining nonsense. Its not even smoke and mirrors; its legal nonsense.

endgenocide

(141 posts)
5. Diaper Don is falling asleep at President Carters funeral
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 10:59 AM
Jan 9

maybe he'll get a text about the denial, that'll wake his old ass up!

NikoGriego

(5 posts)
8. Why call it "Hush Money Case?
Thu Jan 9, 2025, 12:48 PM
Jan 9

Hush Money or Election Interference?

Why is it continually called the "hush money" case when it really should be called the "election interference" case? He was interfering with the election by paying off the porn star to not speak about their tryst. Simple.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New York appeals court de...