Murkowski announces she will vote against Hegseth
Source: The Hill
Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) announced Thursday afternoon that she will vote against Pete Hegseth, President Trumps nominee to serve as secretary of Defense, citing his past infidelity and allegations of sexual assault and excessive drinking.
Murkowski in a statement posted to X said she had significant concerns about his nomination.
She said that managing the Pentagon requires vast experience and expertise and that Hegseths prior career roles do not demonstrate to me that he is prepared for such immense responsibility.
She also cited the numerous allegations of misconduct against Hegseth.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5102952-lisa-murkowski-pete-hegseth/
![](/du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
50 Shades Of Blue
(11,055 posts)GB_RN
(3,295 posts)Than all the Senate GOPQ-ball males put together. SAD!!
Jose Garcia
(3,038 posts)a primary challenge compared to most other Republicans.
BOSSHOG
(40,886 posts)Do the right thing. If you dont get re-elected, you can hold your head up high. Integrity just about on empty in the gop.
dsc
(52,776 posts)2014 I think, but turned around and ran in the general as an independent write in and won.
Hassin Bin Sober
(26,841 posts)dsc
(52,776 posts)and it does prevent her from losing a primary outright. But she has shown she still can win. I am not a fan of her overall but she has shown that she can and will stand up to him.
Jose Garcia
(3,038 posts)Voters approved in 2020.
quakerboy
(14,263 posts)If there weren't enough gop senators to pass him, she'd be voting for him.
It's all about propeganda.
NoRethugFriends
(3,149 posts)Escurumbele
(3,703 posts)threats.
If she is going to vote against him, then keep it quiet until voting time because you know GOPers will threaten her, maybe even with rape, and they will try to make her life miserable, so just shut up, then vote against the guy.
EYESORE 9001
(27,760 posts)Make the rest of the goopers justify their steadfast support for the reprobate.
Emile
(32,125 posts)@emptywheel.bsky.social
From Xitter, here's Lisa Murkowski's statement opposing Hegseth. She did say she believes he'll be confirmed (but likely w/Vance's vote).
https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social/post/3lggkkpi4k22f
FFS.
demmiblue
(37,990 posts)![](https://i.imgur.com/lGBzC2n.jpeg)
JustAnotherGen
(34,241 posts)And gets voted in.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,781 posts)since he has "learned his lesson"?
Polybius
(19,024 posts)She's up for reelection next year.
FoxNewsSucks
(10,922 posts)She must be REALLY SUPER DUPER EXTRA concerned!
MLAA
(18,850 posts)My first thought was it was prearranged that she and Murkowski can vote no and every other Republican will vote yes.
Edit to correct typo.
Ray Bruns
(4,910 posts)![](/emoticons/laughing.gif)
MLAA
(18,850 posts)that never result in her going against her party.
Lulu KC
(6,259 posts)Anxiety source! They need to have two more--one in case Collins chickens out.
Miguelito Loveless
(4,781 posts)Somebody so horrible that even Collins won't support him.
Polybius
(19,024 posts)Hegseth, Tulsi, RFK, and Kash Patel. Possibly Linda McMahon too.
Buddyzbuddy
(301 posts)that resists the tyrant. Our Democratic Senators must help persuade her to change parties if she wants to make a difference in the next 4 years. That goes for any other Senators and members of Congress that have any integrity left.
Fla Dem
(26,188 posts)tinymontgomery
(2,730 posts)That's pretty funny, republican men stepping up. They're one of the biggest group of cowards I've
ever seen. Even the one's that served are cowards at this point.
SheltieLover
(61,836 posts)![](/emoticons/hi.gif)
berniesandersmittens
(11,922 posts)chowder66
(10,085 posts)Bobstandard
(1,788 posts)Wiz Imp
(3,347 posts)Unlike Joni Ernst, she has some integrity and it was clear that from the day Hegseth was chosen for the position, Murkowski was clearly disgusted by the pick and was never going to vote for him.
Bluethroughu
(6,607 posts)Wiz Imp
(3,347 posts)Murkowski (R-AK), Nay
Collins (R-ME), Nay
Bluethroughu
(6,607 posts)Or below...I was looking at the vote with everyone!
Thanks for the correction!
Good I'm glad she and Collins did not vote for him.
RandomNumbers
(18,380 posts)Murkowski voted Yea on that one, but Nay on cloture.
Polybius
(19,024 posts)There were already at least two on him so far. The only one that matters is the final vote tomorrow.
Bluethroughu
(6,607 posts)Bobstandard
(1,788 posts)Polybius
(19,024 posts)$1,000 says she sticks with voting against him.
Bobstandard
(1,788 posts)Or $ Barron coin. Yeah, thats the ticket.
Polybius
(19,024 posts)Bobstandard
(1,788 posts)Its worth $2,000. Youll have to trust me on that. And if you win, youll have to send me the change in USD via Western Union to my address here on E Street, Washington DC. Youll get a tax write off, support crippled children, and be eligible for software that will make your computer run 10 times faster. Did I say 10 times? I meant 100 times!
RANDYWILDMAN
(2,982 posts)should all show us they have a backbone, they all claim too, but none of them really does.
They know Pete is terrible and can't do the job, but but but, who cares do you job and hire a competent person for once, you already promoted a lot of incompetence(partisan) people to the supreme court and you got loose cannon a seat she is clearly not qualified for....you owe your voters
muriel_volestrangler
(102,943 posts)Whether that will be the same on Friday, who knows?
Daleuhlmann
(103 posts)Senator Murkowski is right: Hegsweth does not ahave the trustworthiness or the moral character to be confirmed for one of the most important of cabinet positions. He is a walking, talking national security risk and an easy target to be compromised because of his past behavior. Plus,
he simply does not have the experience or the qualifications to be Secretary of Defense.
DENVERPOPS
(10,637 posts)Is like the RepubliCONs, putting a bunch of monkeys in a room with a basket full of Hand Grenades..........
Bluethroughu
(6,607 posts)Rebl2
(15,446 posts)to advance the vote. Not the final vote.
Bluethroughu
(6,607 posts)![](/emoticons/hi.gif)
wiggs
(8,048 posts)votes and hers doesn't matter.
I don't give her credit for it. She's protecting some position or some portion of voters, not standing up for principle IMHO. I will say she seems a bit more principles than Collins though they both fall back on voicing 'concerns' that never seem to influence votes that matter.
live love laugh
(14,874 posts)![](/emoticons/sarcasm.gif)
milestogo
(19,026 posts)liberalla
(10,217 posts)Do it! Do it!!!
liberalla
(10,217 posts)Greybnk48
(10,464 posts)The got the green light that their votes weren't needed. If they were needed, they would vote for the drunken pig.