Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

demmiblue

(37,990 posts)
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 01:57 PM Jan 23

Murkowski announces she will vote against Hegseth

Source: The Hill

Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) announced Thursday afternoon that she will vote against Pete Hegseth, President Trump’s nominee to serve as secretary of Defense, citing his past infidelity and allegations of sexual assault and excessive drinking.

Murkowski in a statement posted to X said she had “significant concerns” about his nomination.

She said that managing the Pentagon “requires vast experience and expertise” and that Hegseth’s prior career roles “do not demonstrate to me that he is prepared for such immense responsibility.”

She also cited the numerous allegations of misconduct against Hegseth.

Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5102952-lisa-murkowski-pete-hegseth/

57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Murkowski announces she will vote against Hegseth (Original Post) demmiblue Jan 23 OP
Good for her! 50 Shades Of Blue Jan 23 #1
She's Got More Cajones... GB_RN Jan 23 #2
Alaska's quirky election system makes her much less vulnerable to Jose Garcia Jan 23 #10
Sad that that would be a consideration BOSSHOG Jan 23 #23
actually she lost a primary under Obama dsc Jan 23 #24
Does their new-ish ranked choice system change the equation? Do they still have it? Hassin Bin Sober Jan 23 #29
they still have it dsc Jan 23 #31
They didn't have ranked choice voting in 2014. They do now Jose Garcia Jan 24 #57
no, she doesnt. quakerboy Jan 24 #46
Not necessarily. That is true with Collins though NoRethugFriends Jan 24 #51
Let's see how big her cojones are after the parade of republicans talk to her, after listening to their Escurumbele Jan 24 #53
Outstanding EYESORE 9001 Jan 23 #3
Need three more to join her. Emile Jan 23 #4
Sadly... demmiblue Jan 23 #9
Full statement: demmiblue Jan 23 #5
I still think he passes JustAnotherGen Jan 23 #6
So, Collins will vote for him Miguelito Loveless Jan 23 #7
I don't think she will Polybius Jan 23 #11
Just heard on the TV that Collins is also a "no" FoxNewsSucks Jan 23 #15
She is a no until she isn't! I'll believe it when I see it. But, yes, she is extremely concerned! MLAA Jan 23 #18
That's why she's called "Windsock" Suzy Ray Bruns Jan 23 #19
...perfect fit. More than once I've wanted to tell her to shove a sock in it when she starts saying she has 'concerns' MLAA Jan 23 #34
You just never know with her Lulu KC Jan 23 #37
Wow. Miguelito Loveless Jan 24 #47
I think there's at least 4 pics that she won't vote for Polybius Jan 24 #52
They'll be coming after her and anybody else Buddyzbuddy Jan 23 #8
Gutsy Woman! Let's see if any Republican Men will step up. Fla Dem Jan 23 #12
That's pretty funny tinymontgomery Jan 23 #20
Good SheltieLover Jan 23 #13
Good. Now switch parties. Nt berniesandersmittens Jan 23 #14
I hope I'm wrong in that they probably have the votes needed which allows one or more to vote against him. chowder66 Jan 23 #16
I bet she folds. nt Bobstandard Jan 23 #17
Murkowski? Nope. She definitely ain't voting for Hegseth. Wiz Imp Jan 23 #26
The vote I saw was earnst and murkowski voted for him. Bluethroughu Jan 23 #28
You saw wrong. Wiz Imp Jan 23 #30
Thanks, I must have looked at maybe someone above Bluethroughu Jan 23 #40
There was a vote to proceed to consider the nomination. RandomNumbers Jan 23 #36
The Senate has way to many archaic votes Polybius Jan 23 #39
Thank you I must have seen that one! Bluethroughu Jan 23 #41
Wiz, I hope youre right. nt Bobstandard Jan 23 #33
I'll take that bet Polybius Jan 23 #38
Is $Ivanka coin OK? Bobstandard Jan 24 #45
Preferably, $Melania coin n/t Polybius Jan 24 #48
OK. I'll bet one $Melania coin in lieu of $1,000 USD. Bobstandard Jan 24 #56
Mitch, Lindsey and Tuberville RANDYWILDMAN Jan 23 #21
51 to 49 to advance to the final vote - Murkowski and Collins voted to block muriel_volestrangler Jan 23 #22
Good for Senator Murkowski! Daleuhlmann Jan 23 #25
Putting him in charge of anything, DENVERPOPS Jan 24 #55
It said she voted for him?? Bluethroughu Jan 23 #27
That was Rebl2 Jan 23 #32
Thanks I got it. Bluethroughu Jan 23 #42
These 'rebellious' votes are choreographed. She's allowed to vote that way because they counted wiggs Jan 23 #35
She plays the role of the opposition well,! live love laugh Jan 24 #43
She should change parties NOW. milestogo Jan 24 #44
What a fine idea that is! liberalla Jan 24 #50
Thank You Senator Murkowski !!! liberalla Jan 24 #49
This is the usual bullshit kabuki she and Collins pull so women still will vote for them. Greybnk48 Jan 24 #54

Jose Garcia

(3,038 posts)
10. Alaska's quirky election system makes her much less vulnerable to
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 02:14 PM
Jan 23

a primary challenge compared to most other Republicans.

BOSSHOG

(40,886 posts)
23. Sad that that would be a consideration
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 04:33 PM
Jan 23

Do the right thing. If you don’t get re-elected, you can hold your head up high. Integrity just about on empty in the gop.

dsc

(52,776 posts)
24. actually she lost a primary under Obama
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 04:42 PM
Jan 23

2014 I think, but turned around and ran in the general as an independent write in and won.

dsc

(52,776 posts)
31. they still have it
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 05:12 PM
Jan 23

and it does prevent her from losing a primary outright. But she has shown she still can win. I am not a fan of her overall but she has shown that she can and will stand up to him.

quakerboy

(14,263 posts)
46. no, she doesnt.
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 10:51 AM
Jan 24

If there weren't enough gop senators to pass him, she'd be voting for him.

It's all about propeganda.

Escurumbele

(3,703 posts)
53. Let's see how big her cojones are after the parade of republicans talk to her, after listening to their
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 01:25 PM
Jan 24

threats.

If she is going to vote against him, then keep it quiet until voting time because you know GOPers will threaten her, maybe even with rape, and they will try to make her life miserable, so just shut up, then vote against the guy.

demmiblue

(37,990 posts)
9. Sadly...
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 02:10 PM
Jan 23
emptywheel
@emptywheel.bsky.social‬

From Xitter, here's Lisa Murkowski's statement opposing Hegseth. She did say she believes he'll be confirmed (but likely w/Vance's vote).

https://bsky.app/profile/emptywheel.bsky.social/post/3lggkkpi4k22f


FFS.

FoxNewsSucks

(10,922 posts)
15. Just heard on the TV that Collins is also a "no"
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 03:03 PM
Jan 23

She must be REALLY SUPER DUPER EXTRA concerned!

MLAA

(18,850 posts)
18. She is a no until she isn't! I'll believe it when I see it. But, yes, she is extremely concerned!
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 03:09 PM
Jan 23

My first thought was it was prearranged that she and Murkowski can vote no and every other Republican will vote yes.

Edit to correct typo.

MLAA

(18,850 posts)
34. ...perfect fit. More than once I've wanted to tell her to shove a sock in it when she starts saying she has 'concerns'
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 05:34 PM
Jan 23

that never result in her going against her party.

Lulu KC

(6,259 posts)
37. You just never know with her
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 10:07 PM
Jan 23

Anxiety source! They need to have two more--one in case Collins chickens out.

Polybius

(19,024 posts)
52. I think there's at least 4 pics that she won't vote for
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 12:48 PM
Jan 24

Hegseth, Tulsi, RFK, and Kash Patel. Possibly Linda McMahon too.

Buddyzbuddy

(301 posts)
8. They'll be coming after her and anybody else
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 02:08 PM
Jan 23

that resists the tyrant. Our Democratic Senators must help persuade her to change parties if she wants to make a difference in the next 4 years. That goes for any other Senators and members of Congress that have any integrity left.

tinymontgomery

(2,730 posts)
20. That's pretty funny
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 03:20 PM
Jan 23

That's pretty funny, republican men stepping up. They're one of the biggest group of cowards I've
ever seen. Even the one's that served are cowards at this point.

chowder66

(10,085 posts)
16. I hope I'm wrong in that they probably have the votes needed which allows one or more to vote against him.
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 03:05 PM
Jan 23

Wiz Imp

(3,347 posts)
26. Murkowski? Nope. She definitely ain't voting for Hegseth.
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 04:46 PM
Jan 23

Unlike Joni Ernst, she has some integrity and it was clear that from the day Hegseth was chosen for the position, Murkowski was clearly disgusted by the pick and was never going to vote for him.

Bluethroughu

(6,607 posts)
40. Thanks, I must have looked at maybe someone above
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 10:44 PM
Jan 23

Or below...I was looking at the vote with everyone!

Thanks for the correction!

Good I'm glad she and Collins did not vote for him.

RandomNumbers

(18,380 posts)
36. There was a vote to proceed to consider the nomination.
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 08:21 PM
Jan 23

Murkowski voted Yea on that one, but Nay on cloture.

Polybius

(19,024 posts)
39. The Senate has way to many archaic votes
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 10:36 PM
Jan 23

There were already at least two on him so far. The only one that matters is the final vote tomorrow.

Bobstandard

(1,788 posts)
56. OK. I'll bet one $Melania coin in lieu of $1,000 USD.
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 01:58 PM
Jan 24

It’s worth $2,000. You’ll have to trust me on that. And if you win, you’ll have to send me the change in USD via Western Union to my address here on E Street, Washington DC. You’ll get a tax write off, support crippled children, and be eligible for software that will make your computer run 10 times faster. Did I say 10 times? I meant 100 times!

RANDYWILDMAN

(2,982 posts)
21. Mitch, Lindsey and Tuberville
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 03:50 PM
Jan 23

should all show us they have a backbone, they all claim too, but none of them really does.

They know Pete is terrible and can't do the job, but but but, who cares do you job and hire a competent person for once, you already promoted a lot of incompetence(partisan) people to the supreme court and you got loose cannon a seat she is clearly not qualified for....you owe your voters

muriel_volestrangler

(102,943 posts)
22. 51 to 49 to advance to the final vote - Murkowski and Collins voted to block
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 04:00 PM
Jan 23

Whether that will be the same on Friday, who knows?

Daleuhlmann

(103 posts)
25. Good for Senator Murkowski!
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 04:45 PM
Jan 23

Senator Murkowski is right: Hegsweth does not ahave the trustworthiness or the moral character to be confirmed for one of the most important of cabinet positions. He is a walking, talking national security risk and an easy target to be compromised because of his past behavior. Plus,
he simply does not have the experience or the qualifications to be Secretary of Defense.

DENVERPOPS

(10,637 posts)
55. Putting him in charge of anything,
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 01:49 PM
Jan 24

Is like the RepubliCONs, putting a bunch of monkeys in a room with a basket full of Hand Grenades..........

wiggs

(8,048 posts)
35. These 'rebellious' votes are choreographed. She's allowed to vote that way because they counted
Thu Jan 23, 2025, 05:59 PM
Jan 23

votes and hers doesn't matter.

I don't give her credit for it. She's protecting some position or some portion of voters, not standing up for principle IMHO. I will say she seems a bit more principles than Collins though they both fall back on voicing 'concerns' that never seem to influence votes that matter.

Greybnk48

(10,464 posts)
54. This is the usual bullshit kabuki she and Collins pull so women still will vote for them.
Fri Jan 24, 2025, 01:41 PM
Jan 24

The got the green light that their votes weren't needed. If they were needed, they would vote for the drunken pig.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Murkowski announces she w...