Sarah Palin loses defamation retrial against New York Times
Source: MSNBC
Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin lost her defamation retrial against The New York Times over a 2017 editorial she said damaged her reputation, Reuters reported on Tuesday.
The federal jury found the media company not liable after deliberating for about two hours.
Palin, a former Republican vice presidential nominee, lost a previous trial in 2022 against the media company but won a new one due to “several major issues” in the case, as a federal appellate panel put it last year. ....
The Times editorial argued there was a clear and direct link between the Arizona shooting and the political incitement arising from a digital graphic published in March 2010 by Palin’s political action committee. The graphic was a map that superimposed crosshairs over 20 congressional districts represented by Democrats, including Giffords’.
But a relationship between the crosshairs map and the shooting “was never established,” as the appeals court wrote last year, adding that the incident was rather “viewed as a tragic result” of the shooter’s serious mental illness. (A correction on the editorial currently reads: “An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.”)
The Times said in a statement after the appellate ruling last year, “This decision is disappointing. We’re confident we will prevail in a retrial.”
This is a developing story. Check back for updates.
Read more: https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/sarah-palin-new-york-times-verdict-jury-trial-defamation-case-rcna202362
Link to tweet

PortTack
(35,687 posts)Botany
(74,909 posts)
SheltieLover
(72,304 posts)
Response to LetMyPeopleVote (Original post)
no_hypocrisy This message was self-deleted by its author.
Response to no_hypocrisy (Reply #3)
BumRushDaShow This message was self-deleted by its author.
Blues Heron
(7,219 posts)Sneederbunk
(16,374 posts)Of course she could be our next Secretary of Defense.
SarcasticSatyr
(1,342 posts)off a really short pier.
Martin68
(26,249 posts)One wonders if she'll figure out that it's best to stop digging when you're stuck in a hole.
Tarzanrock
(1,250 posts)What a pity! The jury deliberated for "about two hours" before telling that idiot Nazi bitch that she had no case. It takes a minimum of an hour in a jury room to choose the foreperson. That jury took one vote and kicked her sorry, lying ass to the curb. Looks like that jury also didn't agree with that stupid appellate court ruling either and this jury made a factual determination that the NY Times publication was not "“viewed as a tragic result” of the shooter’s serious mental illness[.]" as that goofy appellate court erroneously and improperly determined. This is a real bitch slap to that appellate court ruling.
BOSSHOG
(43,495 posts)mdbl
(7,066 posts)Rincewind
(1,314 posts)read a book.
Wild blueberry
(7,795 posts)Thank you, jury.
johnnyplankton
(552 posts)Her. Not the decision. That's fucking hilarious clap:
:
Cha
(313,407 posts)"Defaming".
Ty
AverageOldGuy
(2,807 posts)Seems as though I heard the name long ago but don't recall anything about her.
lastlib
(26,405 posts)I think she somehow got some publicity as John McCain's coffee girl?
I don't understand it, either......
live love laugh
(15,700 posts)
SunSeeker
(56,313 posts)Aristus
(70,529 posts)n/t
Red Raider 85
(136 posts)Hassler
(4,469 posts)Didn't quit the suit at the halfway mark.
struggle4progress
(123,903 posts)of Karoline Leavitt, and the personal warmth of Kristi Noem: it's such a surprise she's not more popular
Gore1FL
(22,567 posts)She was ultimately a political joke.
LetMyPeopleVote
(167,246 posts)It did not take long for the jury to find against Palin. Given that the first hour of deliberations involved things like picking a foreman and reading instructions, this was indeed fast
Link to tweet

Mustellus
(385 posts).... these congresspersons. Henry II, paraphrased.
( Henry II, founder of stochastic terrorism. Two knights took him up on it, they killed Thomas a Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury. Coming back, expecting a reward, Henry had them executed for murder. Neat and clean....)
marble falls
(67,212 posts)wcmagumba
(4,512 posts)Grab that job Sarah, sure they'll train you up...and where's the rest of your freaky family these days?
BidenRocks
(1,909 posts)or a moustache?
UpInArms
(53,208 posts)
Jacson6
(1,468 posts)She said she didn't want monetary damages and attorneys don't work for free.
LudwigPastorius
(13,094 posts)...always playing the martyr.
wolfie001
(5,787 posts)Today's christo-fascist movement in one pic!
Orrex
(65,675 posts)AKwannabe
(6,811 posts)Haha fucking LOSER!
oasis
(52,623 posts)
LetMyPeopleVote
(167,246 posts)