Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LetMyPeopleVote

(167,246 posts)
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 04:19 PM Apr 2025

Sarah Palin loses defamation retrial against New York Times

Source: MSNBC

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin lost her defamation retrial against The New York Times over a 2017 editorial she said damaged her reputation, Reuters reported on Tuesday.

The federal jury found the media company not liable after deliberating for about two hours.

Palin, a former Republican vice presidential nominee, lost a previous trial in 2022 against the media company but won a new one due to “several major issues” in the case, as a federal appellate panel put it last year. ....

The Times editorial argued there was a clear and direct link between the Arizona shooting and the political incitement arising from a digital graphic published in March 2010 by Palin’s political action committee. The graphic was a map that superimposed crosshairs over 20 congressional districts represented by Democrats, including Giffords’.

But a relationship between the crosshairs map and the shooting “was never established,” as the appeals court wrote last year, adding that the incident was rather “viewed as a tragic result” of the shooter’s serious mental illness. (A correction on the editorial currently reads: “An editorial on Thursday about the shooting of Representative Steve Scalise incorrectly stated that a link existed between political rhetoric and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established. The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.”)

The Times said in a statement after the appellate ruling last year, “This decision is disappointing. We’re confident we will prevail in a retrial.”

This is a developing story. Check back for updates.

Read more: https://www.msnbc.com/deadline-white-house/deadline-legal-blog/sarah-palin-new-york-times-verdict-jury-trial-defamation-case-rcna202362




38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Sarah Palin loses defamation retrial against New York Times (Original Post) LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 OP
Will you please just go away now??!! PortTack Apr 2025 #1
She is long past her "pull date." Botany Apr 2025 #35
I hope she has to pat their legal fees! SheltieLover Apr 2025 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author no_hypocrisy Apr 2025 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author BumRushDaShow Apr 2025 #4
Looks like her lips are deflating, maybe she needs some extra Botox or something. Blues Heron Apr 2025 #5
Another Repug gets a dose of Due Process. Sneederbunk Apr 2025 #6
She needs to take a long pageant walk . . . SarcasticSatyr Apr 2025 #7
Yes! Martin68 Apr 2025 #8
Cry me a river! Tarzanrock Apr 2025 #9
How does one damage Sarah palins reputation? BOSSHOG Apr 2025 #10
Seriously. She does such a good job at it all by herself. mdbl Apr 2025 #15
You could claim she once Rincewind Apr 2025 #36
Ha ha ha. Again. Wild blueberry Apr 2025 #11
So Sad.... johnnyplankton Apr 2025 #12
lol... Sue yourself, Palin... You're the one who's Cha Apr 2025 #13
Who is this "Sarah Palin" person? AverageOldGuy Apr 2025 #14
I may be wrong but----- lastlib Apr 2025 #17
Translation: She's off the gravy train and strapped for cash live love laugh Apr 2025 #16
Wow, what happened to her face? She should be suing her plastic surgeon, not NYT. nt SunSeeker Apr 2025 #18
It's either the plastic surgery, or just the inner ugliness coming to the surface. Aristus Apr 2025 #19
Jeebus, what a waste of time. Who the hell paid her jerkwad lawyers? We know washed-up Barbie didn't. Red Raider 85 Apr 2025 #20
Failin Palin is making progress--she Hassler Apr 2025 #21
She has the morals of Lauren Boebert, the graceful manners of Marjorie Greene, the intelligent wit struggle4progress Apr 2025 #22
It's weird that she is still around. Gore1FL Apr 2025 #23
Well that was fast. LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #24
Won't someone rid me of .... Mustellus Apr 2025 #25
Jeez, that's gonna make a mama bear chew her lipsick tryin' to make the mortgage payment in Wasilla. marble falls Apr 2025 #26
There must be a job flippin burgers in Wasilly... wcmagumba Apr 2025 #27
Is that dark upper lip liner, BidenRocks Apr 2025 #28
I wondered the same UpInArms Apr 2025 #37
My question is who is bank rolling here trials? Jacson6 Apr 2025 #29
Poor Mooselini... LudwigPastorius Apr 2025 #30
Hilarious! wolfie001 Apr 2025 #34
This was her big chance to refudiate their coverage Orrex Apr 2025 #31
Just stopping into REC THIS AKwannabe Apr 2025 #32
Now get lost bird brain! oasis Apr 2025 #33
This made me smile LetMyPeopleVote Apr 2025 #38

Response to LetMyPeopleVote (Original post)

Response to no_hypocrisy (Reply #3)

Martin68

(26,249 posts)
8. Yes!
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 04:59 PM
Apr 2025

One wonders if she'll figure out that it's best to stop digging when you're stuck in a hole.

 

Tarzanrock

(1,250 posts)
9. Cry me a river!
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:00 PM
Apr 2025

What a pity! The jury deliberated for "about two hours" before telling that idiot Nazi bitch that she had no case. It takes a minimum of an hour in a jury room to choose the foreperson. That jury took one vote and kicked her sorry, lying ass to the curb. Looks like that jury also didn't agree with that stupid appellate court ruling either and this jury made a factual determination that the NY Times publication was not "“viewed as a tragic result” of the shooter’s serious mental illness[.]" as that goofy appellate court erroneously and improperly determined. This is a real bitch slap to that appellate court ruling.

AverageOldGuy

(2,807 posts)
14. Who is this "Sarah Palin" person?
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:21 PM
Apr 2025

Seems as though I heard the name long ago but don't recall anything about her.

lastlib

(26,405 posts)
17. I may be wrong but-----
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:34 PM
Apr 2025

I think she somehow got some publicity as John McCain's coffee girl?

I don't understand it, either......

Aristus

(70,529 posts)
19. It's either the plastic surgery, or just the inner ugliness coming to the surface.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:44 PM
Apr 2025

n/t

Red Raider 85

(136 posts)
20. Jeebus, what a waste of time. Who the hell paid her jerkwad lawyers? We know washed-up Barbie didn't.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 05:59 PM
Apr 2025

struggle4progress

(123,903 posts)
22. She has the morals of Lauren Boebert, the graceful manners of Marjorie Greene, the intelligent wit
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:28 PM
Apr 2025

of Karoline Leavitt, and the personal warmth of Kristi Noem: it's such a surprise she's not more popular

LetMyPeopleVote

(167,246 posts)
24. Well that was fast.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:40 PM
Apr 2025

It did not take long for the jury to find against Palin. Given that the first hour of deliberations involved things like picking a foreman and reading instructions, this was indeed fast



Mustellus

(385 posts)
25. Won't someone rid me of ....
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:46 PM
Apr 2025

.... these congresspersons. Henry II, paraphrased.

( Henry II, founder of stochastic terrorism. Two knights took him up on it, they killed Thomas a Becket, Archbishop of Canterbury. Coming back, expecting a reward, Henry had them executed for murder. Neat and clean....)

marble falls

(67,212 posts)
26. Jeez, that's gonna make a mama bear chew her lipsick tryin' to make the mortgage payment in Wasilla.
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:49 PM
Apr 2025

wcmagumba

(4,512 posts)
27. There must be a job flippin burgers in Wasilly...
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 06:58 PM
Apr 2025

Grab that job Sarah, sure they'll train you up...and where's the rest of your freaky family these days?

Jacson6

(1,468 posts)
29. My question is who is bank rolling here trials?
Tue Apr 22, 2025, 09:27 PM
Apr 2025

She said she didn't want monetary damages and attorneys don't work for free.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Sarah Palin loses defamat...