Trump administration is sending 'a message to chill the judiciary' with Wisconsin judge's arrest, her peer says
Source: CNN Politics
Published 2:00 PM EDT, Sun April 27, 2025
CNN — A peer of the Wisconsin judge who the FBI arrested for allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant avoid federal immigration enforcement said her arrest is meant to intimidate the judiciary by the Trump administration.
“I think they’re trying to send a message to chill the judiciary,” Wisconsin Appellate Judge Pedro Colón said in a Saturday interview with CNN’s Kyung Lah, adding, “It speaks more I think to the politics and sort of the symbolic gestures of power by people who don’t really appreciate the Constitution, don’t really appreciate the rule of law.” “They want to create circumstances and a culture where people are unsettled about their rights, about their duties and about the way we go about our jobs,” Colón continued.
Colón’s comments came a day after the FBI charged Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan with obstruction and concealing the individual from arrest. Colón said he’s known Dugan for more than 15 years through the legal community, and described her as “an unbiased, ethical judge.”
Since President Donald Trump took office this year, his administration has cracked down on immigration and Dugan’s arrest underscores its aggressive approach to immigration enforcement.
Read more: https://www.cnn.com/2025/04/27/politics/wisconsin-judge-arrest-trump-administration/index.html

SSJVegeta
(559 posts)Quiet Em
(1,977 posts)There is no logical way they can make their ridiculous charges stick.
SSJVegeta
(559 posts)It does appear to be a theatrical fear tactic and nothing more.
Quiet Em
(1,977 posts)And an absurd performance at that.
Irish_Dem
(70,176 posts)Skittles
(164,523 posts)but he goes after judges and journalists
LetMyPeopleVote
(163,818 posts)I am a corporate lawyer but I do know basic federal criminal procedure. Judge Dugan was arrested on a magistrate warrant and the case had NOT been presented to a grand jury. Before this case can go to trial, this case has to be presented to and voted on by a grand jury. The arrest on Friday was a stunt to "whip the MAGA faithful into a frenzy." One can arrest a suspect without a grand jury indictment but normally there has to be good reason for such arrest
"It’s not just that Dugan was arrested, but how she was arrested. The whole point was to cause a scene. There’s no allegation she was attempting to evade arrest, but the FBI still forced a sitting judge to do a perp walk at her place of work."
Link to tweet
https://www.publicnotice.co/p/trump-bondi-arresting-judges-hannah-dugan
Additionally, Dugan was arrested pursuant to a criminal complaint signed by a federal magistrate judge. There’s nothing improper about that as such, but for felonies in federal court, prosecutors must convene a grand jury and present evidence. Only if the grand jury returns an indictment can someone be prosecuted.
Going before a grand jury isn’t a nicety or a minor procedural step. The Fifth Amendment requires it. Arresting Dugan before convening a grand jury was intended to get flashy headlines and whip the MAGA faithful into a frenzy. Even if a grand jury declines to indict Dugan, the administration has succeeded in creating a climate of fear and suspicion.
Recall that although Trump faced 88 charges in four criminal cases for much worse things than what Dugan is accused of, he was always charged by indictment after presentation to a grand jury and allowed to turn himself in. Here he is in Georgia, where he faced 13 felony counts for trying to overturn the 202 election. Here he is in New York, where he faced — and was convicted of — 34 felonies related to falsifying business records to hide his hush payments to Stormy Daniels. New York state was so solicitous of Trump that he didn’t even have to have his mug shot taken. When he voluntarily surrendered in Miami for the classified documents case, he wasn’t handcuffed.,,,,,
It will be interesting to see a grand jury would indict this judge on the actual facts
As much as the administration would like it to be otherwise, those administrative warrants aren’t the same as judicial warrants. Judicial warrants are signed by a federal or state judge or magistrate and must be complied with as long as they are valid. Administrative warrants — also known as immigration warrants — are issued by administrative agencies such as ICE and signed by an immigration judge. Despite also being called judges, immigration judges are not part of the judicial branch. They are appointed by the attorney general and are part of the executive branch.
I wonder if this case will ever be presented to a grand jury,