Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(165,303 posts)
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 07:20 AM 5 hrs ago

'Weird': Internet erupts after Karoline Leavitt's apparent admission of pregnancy faux pas

Source: Raw Story

December 27, 2025 7:20PM ET


White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt's recent pregnancy disclosure led numerous observers to raise questions about whether or not she intentionally got lip injections knowing she was pregnant.

We recently reported that Leavitt, who's 28, is expecting her second child with her husband, Nick, who is 30 years her senior. But the internet was focused on the fact that Leavitt said her new baby is due in May, and tied that to a recent Vanity Fair close-up photoshoot in which Leavitt was shown with apparent injection marks around her lips.

One popular influencer, Jesus Freakin Congress wrote, "If Karoline Leavitt is due in May 2026, she was already pregnant when the Vanity Fair photos were taken. Which means she appears to have gotten cosmetic fillers while pregnant. And yet, this same administration is out here warning pregnant women not to take Tylenol? So to recap: elective cosmetic injectables are apparently fine, but over-the-counter pain relief is treated like a moral hazard. Interesting…"

Liberal commentator Brian Krassenstein also made a video about it, writing on Saturday, "Weird." "The crowd who doesn’t want to give newborns Hepatitis B shots are fine with putting their pregnancy in jeopardy using lip fillers," he added.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/karoline-leavitt-2674832565/




31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
'Weird': Internet erupts after Karoline Leavitt's apparent admission of pregnancy faux pas (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 5 hrs ago OP
Mar-a-Lago lips are more important. sop 5 hrs ago #1
You mean Joker Face? paleotn 3 hrs ago #7
Even if she did, True Dough 5 hrs ago #2
This is stupid beyond belief. Lip filler injection marks?? You are fixated on lip filler injection marks? Srkdqltr 4 hrs ago #3
So she will be off the stage soon Old Crank 4 hrs ago #4
Lip-filler injections don't have systemic effects but Tylenol does. TheRickles 4 hrs ago #5
Silcone injections for cosmetic use, are NOT approved by the FDA BumRushDaShow 3 hrs ago #9
Yeah, because those injected fillers move around under the skin Farmer-Rick 2 hrs ago #11
Silicone embolisms and silicone syndrome BumRushDaShow 2 hrs ago #13
Thanks for the info Farmer-Rick 1 hr ago #17
Silicone has to enter the bloodstream for emboli to occur, and that only happens with leaking implants. TheRickles 1 hr ago #18
And it can be accidentally injected into any nearby blood vessels BumRushDaShow 1 hr ago #20
I basically agree with your cautions, but the OP says that pregnancies are put at risk by lip-filler injections. TheRickles 1 hr ago #21
No - the loon at HHS has fixated on ANYTHING with decades of research BumRushDaShow 1 hr ago #23
True, and thanks for the links. My beef is with Krassenstein for what he implies: TheRickles 25 min ago #27
He and others are TRYING to point out the *RANK HYPOCRISY* of the staff in the 45 administration BumRushDaShow 10 min ago #29
Occasional Tylenol during pregnancy is fine, mcar 3 hrs ago #10
Wrong Wiz Imp 2 hrs ago #15
what the hell? paleotn 3 hrs ago #6
Pregnant? She spends every weekend with Trump Bengus81 3 hrs ago #8
I don't like her, but lip filler doesn't have systemic effects Polybius 2 hrs ago #12
That is absolutely incorrect - silicone injections are NOT approved for cosmetic use, and for a reason BumRushDaShow 2 hrs ago #14
See post 24 Polybius 44 min ago #25
And you see post #23 and see post #29 BumRushDaShow 3 min ago #31
Wrong Wiz Imp 2 hrs ago #16
Can you supply a citation that links lip-filler, not just injection anywhere, to these systemic symptoms? TheRickles 1 hr ago #19
Here is something that discusses LIQUID (free-flowing) silicone BumRushDaShow 1 hr ago #22
Here Wiz Imp 9 min ago #30
I am only going by what my close friend's doctor said Polybius 46 min ago #24
See post #23 BumRushDaShow 37 min ago #26
So very sad... Mike Nelson 18 min ago #28

Srkdqltr

(9,322 posts)
3. This is stupid beyond belief. Lip filler injection marks?? You are fixated on lip filler injection marks?
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 08:18 AM
4 hrs ago

Old Crank

(6,627 posts)
4. So she will be off the stage soon
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 08:48 AM
4 hrs ago

And in the kitchen, cleaning the house and doing laundry soon?

TheRickles

(3,132 posts)
5. Lip-filler injections don't have systemic effects but Tylenol does.
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 08:54 AM
4 hrs ago

I don't like her, but this is a manufactured controversy.

BumRushDaShow

(165,303 posts)
9. Silcone injections for cosmetic use, are NOT approved by the FDA
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 10:05 AM
3 hrs ago
FDA warns about illegal use of injectable silicone for body contouring and associated health risks

What has generally BEEN approved are silicone implants, which involves some kind of "bag" or "form" that is filled with silicone (like a breast implant), and is surgically inserted under the skin.

Apparently there ARE such "implants" available for lips, I expect for those who may have had their lips damaged from any myriad of reasons (burns, disease, injuries, birth defects, etc), but that is different from "injecting" the silicone around and in them to make them "look fuller".

There have been numerous reports over the years of mostly women who have died from unlicensed practitioners doing silicone injections.

Farmer-Rick

(12,420 posts)
11. Yeah, because those injected fillers move around under the skin
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 10:29 AM
2 hrs ago

That's how people get that puffy looking pillow face from their injected filler moving to other parts of their face and body.

I heard of a woman having to have filler surgically removed from her chest area. Yeah it had moved down around her chest than hardened into a cyst of some kind. Fun times with injectable filler. Yeah, totally safe.

TheRickles

(3,132 posts)
18. Silicone has to enter the bloodstream for emboli to occur, and that only happens with leaking implants.
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 11:23 AM
1 hr ago

The amount of silicone in lip-filler injections is tiny in comparison, and has no easy route into the bloodstream. So yes, implants are a health risk, but this story about Leavitt's lips is way overblown.

BumRushDaShow

(165,303 posts)
20. And it can be accidentally injected into any nearby blood vessels
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 11:42 AM
1 hr ago

and can be absorbed into the skin and muscles and circulate throughout the body.

There is a REASON why LIQUID silicone injections are NOT approved by the FDA.

Silicone (and sometimes saline liquid) is approved when contained and sealed within some type of "bag-like" form.

And no it's NOT "overblown" because you have a lunatic Secretary of HHS who has spouted crap about acetaminophen, let alone a whole pile of other bullshit things related to anything "medical".

This is now the 2nd issue that Leavett has been a part of that this hypocritical administration has ranted about (the first was her nephew being born to an undocumented immigrant, who is set to be deported) and now this.

You fight fire with fire because this administration has prided itself in spreading misinformation and burning everything down.

TheRickles

(3,132 posts)
21. I basically agree with your cautions, but the OP says that pregnancies are put at risk by lip-filler injections.
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 11:52 AM
1 hr ago

A quick Internet scan doesn't show any documented cases of that, although it's theoretically possible. Bottom line: it was a terribly overblown comparison for Krassenstein to make. There are plenty of other things to criticize Leavitt about.

BumRushDaShow

(165,303 posts)
23. No - the loon at HHS has fixated on ANYTHING with decades of research
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 12:06 PM
1 hr ago

as putting a pregnancy "at risk" like acetaminophen use, but there ARE cautions for pregnant women against doing ANY (elective) cosmetic surgery while pregnant -

From a NIH publication -

J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2022 Apr-Jun;15(2):108–117. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_226_20

Dermatologic and Cosmetic Procedures in Pregnancy

Adit Mohan Garg 1, Venkataram Mysore 1,✉

PMCID: PMC9364454 PMID: 35965909
Abstract

Background:

Patients may develop a need to undergo procedures while being pregnant and this requires a certain risk-benefit profiling to be done by the clinician. Skin changes during pregnancy such as melasma, striae, varicose veins, hirsutism, and increased skin growths may raise concerns for the lady. Although pregnancy-induced physiologic changes may prompt a surgeon to delay nonessential procedures until after delivery, certain skin conditions may require urgent intervention. Others that may be nonurgent, elective, or cosmetic may need careful analysis.

Materials and Methods:

Data were extracted from available literature through a PubMed search for the following keywords: “dermatological procedures in pregnancy,” “dermatosurgical procedures during pregnancy,” “aesthetic procedures in pregnancy,” “safety in pregnancy,” “teratogenicity of drugs,” “local anesthesia during pregnancy,” “physiological changes in pregnancy,” “cosmetic procedures during pregnancy,” and “lasers in pregnancy.”

Results:

Only procedures which are safe and necessary should be carried out in a pregnant woman. Electrocautery, radiofrequency, cryotherapy, and lasers for warts, particularly genital, surgical interventions for skin malignancies, and other small growths should be performed. Safe but cautious outlook is required for intralesional steroid injections, aesthetic procedures such as chemical peeling, botulinum toxin, microdermabrasion, and biopsies for questionable lesions. Absolutely contraindicated procedures include fillers, sclerotherapy, and liposuction.

(snip)


IOW, if you want to do cosmetic lip enhancement, YOU WAIT.

TheRickles

(3,132 posts)
27. True, and thanks for the links. My beef is with Krassenstein for what he implies:
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 12:52 PM
25 min ago

that lip-filler injections put pregnancies at risk. The cautions you cite are for body-contouring fillers (butt enhancement, etc.). The incidence of lip-filler causing systemic problems is 0.02% (see my other post), and pregnancy damage has never been documented after that very localized procedure.

Which is to say, Leavitt is vain enough to take the (very low) risk of getting her lips enhanced if it will make her more glamorous today, and the vanity behind the whole Mar-a-Lago look is quite stunning. But still, Krassenstein is resorting to clickbait to make his point when it's not necessary. Everyone can plainly see how out-of-control these image-obsessed, Trumpian caricature women are.

BumRushDaShow

(165,303 posts)
29. He and others are TRYING to point out the *RANK HYPOCRISY* of the staff in the 45 administration
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 01:07 PM
10 min ago

Not calling them out for imposing idiotic restrictions with a "For me, but not for thee" asinine and haughty declaration, becomes a retreat by Democrats, while 45 and the GOP continues to pummel our sensibilities, knowledge and expertise of SCIENTIFIC FACTS (and I say this as a retired Chemist and former employee of a HHS agency).

I worked under 6 Presidents and 10 Secretaries of Health and Human Services (including "Actings/transitionals" ) during my federal career. Brainworm RFK Jr is THE ABSO-FUCKING-LUTELY WORST to occupy that position.

Keep attacking their weaknesses.

Wiz Imp

(8,794 posts)
15. Wrong
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 11:15 AM
2 hrs ago

Lip filler systemic effects are rare but serious, involving body-wide reactions like fever, widespread rash, or difficulty breathing (systemic allergy) or severe localized issues like vascular occlusion (blood clot/blockage) leading to skin death (necrosis), vision loss, or even stroke if filler enters a major vessel, requiring immediate medical care. More common issues are localized redness, swelling, lumps, infection, or filler migration, but severe, delayed, or widespread symptoms signal a systemic problem needing urgent attention.

paleotn

(21,449 posts)
6. what the hell?
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 09:38 AM
3 hrs ago

Dear God that woman is a freak. What is it with these people? Every single one of them is beaucoup fucked up.

Polybius

(21,423 posts)
12. I don't like her, but lip filler doesn't have systemic effects
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 10:30 AM
2 hrs ago

I also don't like that it's a man blasting her for this. With that being said, I hope she quits for good.

BumRushDaShow

(165,303 posts)
14. That is absolutely incorrect - silicone injections are NOT approved for cosmetic use, and for a reason
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 11:13 AM
2 hrs ago

See this post - https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=3589120

It helps to NOT spread misinformation.

Polybius

(21,423 posts)
25. See post 24
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 12:33 PM
44 min ago

Also, I never said silicone. Temporary injections are far more common, and last about a month or more.

Wiz Imp

(8,794 posts)
16. Wrong
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 11:16 AM
2 hrs ago

Lip filler systemic effects are rare but serious, involving body-wide reactions like fever, widespread rash, or difficulty breathing (systemic allergy) or severe localized issues like vascular occlusion (blood clot/blockage) leading to skin death (necrosis), vision loss, or even stroke if filler enters a major vessel, requiring immediate medical care. More common issues are localized redness, swelling, lumps, infection, or filler migration, but severe, delayed, or widespread symptoms signal a systemic problem needing urgent attention.

TheRickles

(3,132 posts)
19. Can you supply a citation that links lip-filler, not just injection anywhere, to these systemic symptoms?
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 11:32 AM
1 hr ago

The amount of silicone injected into the lips is miniscule compared to the amount injected in, say, butt-enhancement injections. So I'm guessing the rate of emboli or the above is also tiny. This study reports a rate of 0.02% systemic side-effects from lip injections: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11525007/|

BumRushDaShow

(165,303 posts)
22. Here is something that discusses LIQUID (free-flowing) silicone
Sun Dec 28, 2025, 11:57 AM
1 hr ago
Is Silicone Toxic?

Here is an article from FDA (pre-45 administration in 2023) on "fillers" - Dermal Filler Do's and Don'ts for Wrinkles, Lips and More

Specifically, if she is not using "approved" types, then there can and will be problems -

(snip)

FDA warnings about unapproved fillers

  • The FDA has not approved injectable silicone or any injectable fillers for body contouring or enhancement. The FDA has warned against getting filler injected into the breasts, buttocks, or spaces between the muscles. Using injectable filler for large-scale body contouring or body enhancement can lead to serious injury, including long-term pain, infection, permanent scarring or disfigurement, and even death.
  • The FDA has not approved needle-free devices for the injection of dermal fillers and warns against using them to inject hyaluronic acid or other lip and facial fillers. The injectors use high pressure and do not provide enough control over where filler will be placed. Serious injuries and in some cases, permanent harm to the skin, lips or eyes have occurred.
  • The FDA also warns against buying or using lip or facial fillers that are sold directly to the public. They are not FDA approved and may be contaminated with chemicals and infectious organisms. The only FDA-approved dermal fillers are supplied by a prescription for injection by a licensed health care professional using a syringe with a needle or a cannula (a small flexible tubing with a blunt tip that is inserted under the skin).


  • (snip)

    Polybius

    (21,423 posts)
    24. I am only going by what my close friend's doctor said
    Sun Dec 28, 2025, 12:30 PM
    46 min ago

    She is pregnant and asked her primary about lip fillers. He told her there is nothing to worry about.

    For the record, he's not the one doing the injections, so he doesn't benefit at all from it.

    BumRushDaShow

    (165,303 posts)
    26. See post #23
    Sun Dec 28, 2025, 12:40 PM
    37 min ago
    https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=post&forum=1014&pid=3589170

    And specifically from that paper -

    Results:

    Only procedures which are safe and necessary should be carried out in a pregnant woman. Electrocautery, radiofrequency, cryotherapy, and lasers for warts, particularly genital, surgical interventions for skin malignancies, and other small growths should be performed. Safe but cautious outlook is required for intralesional steroid injections, aesthetic procedures such as chemical peeling, botulinum toxin, microdermabrasion, and biopsies for questionable lesions. Absolutely contraindicated procedures include fillers, sclerotherapy, and liposuction.

    (snip)


    I love how men just LOVE to control women and argue what is and isn't in their best interest - all for "looks".

    Mike Nelson

    (10,897 posts)
    28. So very sad...
    Sun Dec 28, 2025, 12:59 PM
    18 min ago

    ... if only their ages were reversed, they might be able to have lip poofs galore... without this potential problem. Still, we have something to look forward to... in another 30 years, Karoline can have her lips poofed without fear, to look good on her FOX "News" show.

    Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»'Weird': Internet erupts ...