Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(166,157 posts)
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 08:10 PM 14 hrs ago

Supreme Court will decide on use of warrants that collect the location history of cellphone users

Source: AP

Updated 3:31 PM EST, January 16, 2026


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide the constitutionality of broad search warrants that collect the location history of cellphone users to find people near crime scenes.

The case involves what is a known as a “geofence warrant” that was served on Google in a police hunt for a bank robber in suburban Richmond, Virginia. Geofence warrants, an increasingly popular investigative tool, seek location data on every person within a specific location over a certain period of time.

Police used the information to arrest Okello Chatrie in the 2019 robbery of the Call Federal Credit Union in Midlothian. Chatrie eventually pleaded guilty and was sentenced to nearly 12 years in prison.

Chatrie’s lawyers challenged the warrant as a violation of his privacy because it allowed authorities to gather the location history of people near the bank without having any evidence they had anything to do with the robbery. Prosecutors argued that Chatrie had no expectation of privacy because he voluntarily opted into Google’s Location History.

Read more: https://apnews.com/article/supreme-court-location-tracking-warrants-9d8a0b0bcfcbc0a0891676e0e0a5f0c6

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Supreme Court will decide on use of warrants that collect the location history of cellphone users (Original Post) BumRushDaShow 14 hrs ago OP
My bet is the Republican majority on SCOTUS will render another pro-fascists ruling. cstanleytech 11 hrs ago #1
Maybe not Polybius 9 hrs ago #6
They have a six majority so they can afford to offer a token dissent. cstanleytech 7 hrs ago #7
Well, we only need to sway one more Polybius 7 hrs ago #8
At some point (if not already) we're going to have to decide on shutting them off or privacy when traveling Cheezoholic 11 hrs ago #2
"...try to force you to stay in contact for some stupid reason..." markodochartaigh 11 hrs ago #4
What is the down side to gop? Herself 11 hrs ago #3
Google is evil. C Moon 9 hrs ago #5

Cheezoholic

(3,545 posts)
2. At some point (if not already) we're going to have to decide on shutting them off or privacy when traveling
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 10:24 PM
11 hrs ago

I personally have mine off and in a faraday bag that vastly reduces any chance of it being tracked when traveling. I'm just a noid but its seriously coming to that. I wouldn't be surprised if at some point carriers try to force you to stay in contact for some stupid reason to satisfy and ever increasing surveillance state.

markodochartaigh

(5,079 posts)
4. "...try to force you to stay in contact for some stupid reason..."
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 10:53 PM
11 hrs ago

My location is turned off. When I google a restaurant or grocery store, or anything like that, I get pop-ups telling me to turn on my location. It's only an annoyance but I'm sure that the techbros are working on a bigger stick since I wouldn't take their carrot.

Herself

(191 posts)
3. What is the down side to gop?
Fri Jan 16, 2026, 10:35 PM
11 hrs ago

That they get caught in their own geofence and lose the midterms same time.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Supreme Court will decide...