McConnell: Congressional role in trade policy 'not an inconvenience to avoid'
Source: The Hill
02/20/26 2:19 PM ET
Sen. Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) joined several other Republicans in expressing his approval of Fridays Supreme Court decision largely knocking down President Trumps tariffs. The court found in a 6-3 decision that many of the Trump administrations tariffs were unlawfully imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA).
In a statement released on Friday afternoon, McConnell noted Congress constitutional authority over taxes and tariffs. Today, the Supreme Court reaffirmed authority that has rested with Congress for centuries, the Kentucky senator said.
McConnell joined three other Republicans to vote for a Senate resolution last October that called for the Trump administration to repeal its tariffs on foreign nations. The vote passed amid rising discontent from U.S. consumers and businesses with the administrations economic policies.
As a matter of policy, the empty merits of sweeping trade wars with Americas friends were evident long before todays decision, McConnell said on Friday. The American people already know that when Washington throws up artificial barriers, building and buying here at home become more expensive.
Read more: https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/5747917-mitch-mcconnell-supreme-court-tariffs/
There is NO "Congressional role". You GOP asses gave that up and ceded your power to 45.
lostincalifornia
(5,180 posts)muriel_volestrangler
(105,920 posts)How chickenshit does a senator have to be to wait for an SC ruling before pointing out what the US constitution says?
mdbl
(8,402 posts)EarthFirst
(4,034 posts)Piggy has you right where youre being told to sit; in the shadow of his own filth.
BaronChocula
(4,293 posts)Cheezoholic
(3,617 posts)groundloop
(13,683 posts)Multichromatic
(95 posts)You always had the power to stop Trump. You and the Republican party bowed down before Trump and never stood up to him.
Now the the Supreme Court has ruled and you don't have to stand up to Trump or DO anything. You are trying to get out in front of the news cycle with a "bold" comment.
NOW... you have finally found your voice. How brave of you and the other Republicans.
kurtyboy
(991 posts)So far as I know (and I've not done ay searching) the marks the ONLY time McConnell has brought up Article I with respect to Trump's actions (or ever? Certainly not during the Bush 43 administration.)
Up until now, it's been one Senate GOP wet kiss after another given to proponents of the because-we-say-so, wholly bullshitty, and utterly inconsistent* Unitary Executive "theory."
*Stop taking Unitarizec if you are or thinking about becoming a Democrat. Side effects might include fascism, corruption, crime, or the abolishment of Constitutional Freedoms. Ask your doctor if Unitarizec is right for you.
agingdem
(8,807 posts)for Trump and his agenda of revenge/avarice/bigotry.. Mitch used Trump, a preening toxic clown, to pack the courts with incompetent dogmatic ideologues tasked with nullifying Roe v Wade/the Affordable Care Act/the Marriage Equality Act.. busy as he was destroying a womans right to choose/denying health insurance to the most vulnerable/patrolling bedrooms, Mitch shoved thru a nauseatingly obscene tax cut for his billionaire donors...all this while his wife, Elaine Chao, was Trumps labor secretary..no conflict there..
Mitch, that decrepit quasi cadaver, had two opportunities to rid us of Trump, two opportunities to impeach Trump, two opportunities to turn Trump into a cautionary tale of corruption and incompetence at the top..instead Mitch voted no..twice..
Heres hoping Mitch dies a very slow agonizing death..
..
Scalded Nun
(1,642 posts)debsy
(848 posts)You gave up your right to speak against this bullshit when you whipped your senators into shape so they didnt convict after he was impeached. Get the fuck out, shut the fuck up, and sit the fuck down.
niyad
(131,002 posts)BigmanPigman
(54,893 posts)Between tRump and Mitch I can't decide who I'd love to see "drop dead on live" TV first. I wonder if there is a way to get both of them on the same stage for all the viewers out there. Maybe the State of the Union address would be a nice venue.