Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

highplainsdem

(63,221 posts)
Tue May 26, 2026, 04:58 PM 9 hrs ago

Berkeley Law's AI crackdown highlights chatbot concerns

Source: Reuters

Starting this summer, students at the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, are barred from using AI to brainstorm a paper topic, generate an exam outline, summarize a legal rule for use in a paper, or correct grammatical mistakes ​in a paper, among other prohibitions.

The new policy — which was unveiled Thursday and replaces a more lenient set of AI rules ‌that Berkeley adopted in 2023 — comes amid a wider debate in legal education over how far schools should go to embrace or restrict AI use, and whether the rapidly evolving technology is undermining students’ development of foundational legal skills.

Critics of Berkeley’s revised AI policy say it bars too many legitimate AI uses ​at a time when legal employers expect newly minted attorneys to know how to use the technology. University of Houston ​law professor Seth Chandler dubbed Berkeley’s AI in legal education policy “awful” on his blog, calling it an “institutional ⁠attempt to recover the world of 2018” before AI was mainstream. Chandler told Reuters that law students should be allowed to use AI ​to "understand doctrine, generate hypotheticals, test arguments, and prepare for class."

Supporters of the policy counter that students should master basic lawyering skills and legal ​judgment before leveraging AI, and that many students aren’t yet sophisticated enough to recognize pitfalls of the technology, such as its penchant for “hallucinating” legal cases that don’t exist.

-snip-


Read more: https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/berkeley-laws-ai-crackdown-highlights-chatbot-concerns-2026-05-26/

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Berkeley Law's AI crackdown highlights chatbot concerns (Original Post) highplainsdem 9 hrs ago OP
How can this possibly be enforced? groundloop 9 hrs ago #1
Those yellow paper legal pads and blue exam books make a comeback??? hunter 5 hrs ago #3
I don't know how it could, except when using blue books for exams. highplainsdem 3 hrs ago #4
That's wut I'm talkin' 'bout! Back to basic brain development! ancianita 9 hrs ago #2
Which beats hell out of having students learn to cheat with AI. highplainsdem 3 hrs ago #5

groundloop

(13,929 posts)
1. How can this possibly be enforced?
Tue May 26, 2026, 05:13 PM
9 hrs ago

I tend to agree with the reasoning behind this, but fail to see how it can be enforced.

hunter

(40,884 posts)
3. Those yellow paper legal pads and blue exam books make a comeback???
Tue May 26, 2026, 08:41 PM
5 hrs ago

The thought of incompetent law students copying their AI sessions to a legal pad by hand and failing spectacularly on their handwritten blue book exams somehow amuses me.

If hand written papers were good enough for Abraham Lincoln they ought to be good enough for anybody.

https://www.archives.gov/nhprc/projects/catalog/abraham-lincoln

highplainsdem

(63,221 posts)
4. I don't know how it could, except when using blue books for exams.
Tue May 26, 2026, 10:43 PM
3 hrs ago

Stanford had initially decided to rely on the honor system, which had gone so badly they went back to blue books.

But even then they'll have to watch out for students trying to use smart glasses to cheat.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Berkeley Law's AI crackdo...