Hawaii
Related: About this forumLawmakers override governor’s veto of Maui hospital bill
HONOLULU (AP) Hawaii lawmakers voted to override Gov. David Iges veto of a bill that would transfer control of three Maui County hospitals to Kaiser Permanente, making it the largest privatization of public facilities in state history.
The legislation provides severance packages and retirement benefits to the hospital workers affected by the move, and Ige says its too expensive. He vetoed the bill earlier this month, also citing concerns that it could jeopardize the tax-exempt status of the Employees Retirement System.
The Legislature met in special session Wednesday and secured the necessary votes to overturn Iges decision.
We are extremely grateful to the leadership of and members of the Hawaii State Senate and House of Representatives for convening a special session to forward the discussions necessary for our hospitals to transition, said Wes Lo, Hawaii Health Systems Maui Region CEO.
Read more: http://westhawaiitoday.com/news/state-wire/lawmakers-override-governor-s-veto-maui-hospital-bill
MADem
(135,425 posts)The 2nd half of that piece says that this is on hold pending appeal?
Ige said he is in discussions with the attorney general about the veto override and that he stands by his decision. He issued a statement saying this transaction must be done correctly for the common good. The concerns expressed in my veto message have not changed.
Meanwhile, the Ige administration has been negotiating with a union suing the state over claims that the privatization violates the contracts clause of the U.S. Constitution and interferes with collective bargaining agreements. The union represents 1,500 Hawaii Health Systems Corp. employees.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an injunction in May that put the privatization effort on hold.
PoiBoy
(1,559 posts)...can be found here...
http://www.civilbeat.org/2016/07/legislature-overrides-iges-veto-of-maui-hospital-workers-bill/
<snip>
In a statement Wednesday evening, Ige said his administrations concerns over the bill remain unchanged: the bill jeopardizes the Employees Retirement Systems tax-exempt status; the bill does not appropriate funds for lump-sum cash payments for affected employees; and the bill adds an additional unfunded liability of about $17.2 million to the ERS and $18.4 million to the Employer-Union Health Benefits Trust Fund, which puts the states long-term financial position, along with its bond ratings in jeopardy. Bond ratings determine what the state pays in interest on borrowed funds.
<end>