Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

littlemissmartypants

(26,351 posts)
Mon Jan 6, 2025, 10:38 PM Jan 6

Federal judge punts disputed judicial race back to North Carolina's conservative state Supreme Court

Federal judge punts disputed judicial race back to North Carolina's conservative state Supreme Court

WUNC | By Rusty Jacobs

Published January 6, 2025 at 8:46 PM EST

https://www.wunc.org/2025-01-06/nc-supreme-court-race-federal-judge-allison-riggs-jefferson-griffin

Republican judicial candidate Jefferson Griffin is getting the audience he wanted for his claim that 60,000 ballots should be invalidated in his electoral loss to Democrat Allison Riggs. A federal district court judge has remanded Griffin's election protest to the heavily conservative state Supreme Court, the same court Griffin is trying to join.

After the general election and two recounts — a statewide machine recount and a partial hand-to-eye recount of ballots from randomly selected early voting sites and Election Day precincts in each county — Allison Riggs, the Democratic incumbent, holds a 734-vote lead over Griffin.

The vote count notwithstanding, Griffin, a judge on the North Carolina Court of Appeals, has fought to throw out more than 60,000 ballots for alleged irregularities despite lacking evidence of any actual voter ineligibility.

In most of the cases, Griffin has alleged the disputed ballots were cast by voters who did not properly register under North Carolina law. The issue has to do with voters who registered — some of them many years and election cycles ago — using a form that predated the federal Help America Vote Act, or HAVA, of 2002. The pre-HAVA registration form did not clearly mandate registrants provide the last four digits of their Social Security number or their driver's license number.

Snip...more...
https://www.wunc.org/2025-01-06/nc-supreme-court-race-federal-judge-allison-riggs-jefferson-griffin


❤️pants
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge punts disputed judicial race back to North Carolina's conservative state Supreme Court (Original Post) littlemissmartypants Jan 6 OP
So, I am curious... OldBaldy1701E Jan 7 #1
Completely insane... ColinC Jan 7 #2
So, would they be throwing out those ballots in ALL races Bettie Jan 7 #3
All. ❤️ littlemissmartypants Jan 7 #4
Honestly confused angrychair Jan 7 #5

OldBaldy1701E

(6,965 posts)
1. So, I am curious...
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 07:33 AM
Jan 7

These votes they mention... who were they for, I wonder? Were there any irregularities of the type mentioned in any rethug votes? Realistically, there has to be, since all rethug voters are not younger than 35. Will they be tossed out as well?

Bettie

(17,589 posts)
3. So, would they be throwing out those ballots in ALL races
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 07:51 PM
Jan 7

or do they just not want to count them for the Supreme Court race?

Because that could change some other races, right?

angrychair

(10,034 posts)
5. Honestly confused
Tue Jan 7, 2025, 08:44 PM
Jan 7

How is this happening given to multiple recounts and rulings and the protest is without merit. This is completely insane.

Latest Discussions»Region Forums»North Carolina»Federal judge punts dispu...