Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
North Carolina
Related: About this forumFederal judge punts disputed judicial race back to North Carolina's conservative state Supreme Court
Federal judge punts disputed judicial race back to North Carolina's conservative state Supreme Court
WUNC | By Rusty Jacobs
Published January 6, 2025 at 8:46 PM EST
https://www.wunc.org/2025-01-06/nc-supreme-court-race-federal-judge-allison-riggs-jefferson-griffin
Republican judicial candidate Jefferson Griffin is getting the audience he wanted for his claim that 60,000 ballots should be invalidated in his electoral loss to Democrat Allison Riggs. A federal district court judge has remanded Griffin's election protest to the heavily conservative state Supreme Court, the same court Griffin is trying to join.
After the general election and two recounts a statewide machine recount and a partial hand-to-eye recount of ballots from randomly selected early voting sites and Election Day precincts in each county Allison Riggs, the Democratic incumbent, holds a 734-vote lead over Griffin.
The vote count notwithstanding, Griffin, a judge on the North Carolina Court of Appeals, has fought to throw out more than 60,000 ballots for alleged irregularities despite lacking evidence of any actual voter ineligibility.
In most of the cases, Griffin has alleged the disputed ballots were cast by voters who did not properly register under North Carolina law. The issue has to do with voters who registered some of them many years and election cycles ago using a form that predated the federal Help America Vote Act, or HAVA, of 2002. The pre-HAVA registration form did not clearly mandate registrants provide the last four digits of their Social Security number or their driver's license number.
Snip...more...
https://www.wunc.org/2025-01-06/nc-supreme-court-race-federal-judge-allison-riggs-jefferson-griffin
WUNC | By Rusty Jacobs
Published January 6, 2025 at 8:46 PM EST
https://www.wunc.org/2025-01-06/nc-supreme-court-race-federal-judge-allison-riggs-jefferson-griffin
Republican judicial candidate Jefferson Griffin is getting the audience he wanted for his claim that 60,000 ballots should be invalidated in his electoral loss to Democrat Allison Riggs. A federal district court judge has remanded Griffin's election protest to the heavily conservative state Supreme Court, the same court Griffin is trying to join.
After the general election and two recounts a statewide machine recount and a partial hand-to-eye recount of ballots from randomly selected early voting sites and Election Day precincts in each county Allison Riggs, the Democratic incumbent, holds a 734-vote lead over Griffin.
The vote count notwithstanding, Griffin, a judge on the North Carolina Court of Appeals, has fought to throw out more than 60,000 ballots for alleged irregularities despite lacking evidence of any actual voter ineligibility.
In most of the cases, Griffin has alleged the disputed ballots were cast by voters who did not properly register under North Carolina law. The issue has to do with voters who registered some of them many years and election cycles ago using a form that predated the federal Help America Vote Act, or HAVA, of 2002. The pre-HAVA registration form did not clearly mandate registrants provide the last four digits of their Social Security number or their driver's license number.
Snip...more...
https://www.wunc.org/2025-01-06/nc-supreme-court-race-federal-judge-allison-riggs-jefferson-griffin
❤️pants
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Federal judge punts disputed judicial race back to North Carolina's conservative state Supreme Court (Original Post)
littlemissmartypants
Jan 6
OP
OldBaldy1701E
(6,965 posts)1. So, I am curious...
These votes they mention... who were they for, I wonder? Were there any irregularities of the type mentioned in any rethug votes? Realistically, there has to be, since all rethug voters are not younger than 35. Will they be tossed out as well?
ColinC
(11,098 posts)2. Completely insane...
Bettie
(17,589 posts)3. So, would they be throwing out those ballots in ALL races
or do they just not want to count them for the Supreme Court race?
Because that could change some other races, right?
littlemissmartypants
(26,351 posts)4. All. ❤️
angrychair
(10,034 posts)5. Honestly confused
How is this happening given to multiple recounts and rulings and the protest is without merit. This is completely insane.