Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Germany's far-right AfD names its first-ever chancellor candidate - DW News
The far-right Alternative for Germany - or AfD - continues its party convention today, after confirming Alice Weidel as its first-ever candidate for chancellor in next month's elections.
The start of the weekend gathering in the eastern town of Riesa was delayed by thousands of protesters. Polls ahead of elections on February 23rd put the AfD in second place at around 20 percent. Other parties are refusing to work with them, hoping a so-called 'firewall' will keep the AfD out of power.
====================
Did Elon Musk hosting AfD's Alice Weidel go against German electoral regulations? - DW News
In Germany, there's growing concern that Elon Musk is interfering in the campaign for next month's national elections. The billionaire has publicly endorsed the far-right Alternative for Germany party (AfD) and has called on Chancellor Olaf Scholz to stand down. On his social media platform X, Musk hosted a conversation with one of the AfD's leaders, Alice Weidel. She rejects comparisons of her party to the Nazis.
Authorities in Germany are investigating whether Thursday's talk on X constitutes an illegal party donation. Here's what a lobby watchdog had to say about the talk between Musk and Weidel: "The crucial point here is not that the talk itself is a donation. If that were the case, then a lot of media interviews would count as a donation. But that boosted reach on the platform X would constitute as a party donation, because usually X would sell this kind of boost, but with Elon Musk as the owner of the platform, his activities and this is proven or has been proven quite often, are artificially boosted. So the reach is much higher than for a user with a similar follower count that isn't the owner of X. And since this service of this boost in reach is supplied to the party Afd for free, this would constitute a party donation. And in Germany, party donations from entities from outside of the EU are illegal. And both Elon Musk and the Platform X are situated in the US. So this would be an illegal party donation."
If a court rules that this talk was an illegal party donation, what would that mean for Musk and the AfD?