Elizabeth Warren
Related: About this forumDC Centrists (DINOS - which are about 99% of them) Freak Out Over Elizabeth Warren
(x-posted here from GD by request)
As the Democratic caucuses in Congress have shrunk, and as Warrens influence has grown, the elites anxiety over her rise has become almost palpable. Ive lost track of the number of times one centrist pundit or another has called her the Ted Cruz of the left (which is never intended as a compliment). It was just this week, in fact, that a new group of centrist Democrats, The New Democrat Coalition, announced its plans to keep control of the party out of Warrens hands. Its all very predictable; but if youre familiar with Warrens views and her record, it simply doesnt make sense.
By way of illustration, take a look at the new profile of Warren published this week in Politico Magazine, which is hardly a hotbed of doctrinaire liberalism. Written by Glenn Thrush and Manu Raju, the piece bears most of the hallmarks of the Politico style, for better and worse. At no point during its thousands of words do Warrens policy views get any more than the most cursory attention, and the only new information it provides is essentially gossip. (Former President Bill Clinton refused to campaign for Warren during her 2012 Senate bid because she has been mean to his banker buddies, for example.) But whats most interesting about the piece is that even here, in the unofficial flagship magazine of elite Washington, the fundamentally non-radical approach Warren takes to politics is crystal clear.
Indeed, what we see Warren doing in the piece more than anything else is playing politics by the traditional means. Before her star-making performance as an overseer of the Wall Street bailouts, she spends years quietly but consistently building contacts in Washington and making powerful friends. When the White House decides it wont go to bat for her to head the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau she largely created, she doesnt rail against them in the press or demand it appoint a radical in her stead. When Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid offers her a spot on the leadership team, she happily takes it, hoping to prove to anybody watching that shes a team player. Hell, according to Politico, shes even trying to find ways to compromise with Republicans in the Senate!
Given all of the above, reasonable person might ask why Matt Bais Washington finds Warren so threatening nevertheless. Im not a mind-reader, of course, but I can offer two theories. The first and most obvious reason is that Washington is, to put it gently, a swamp of corruption where many influential people live comfortably thanks to Wall Street. Maybe theyre lobbyists; maybe they work in free-market think tanks; maybe theyre employed by the defense industry, which benefits greatly from Wall Streets largesse. Or maybe theyre government bureaucrats who find Warrens opposition to the revolving door to be in profound conflict with their future plans.
THE REST OF THE STORY:
http://www.salon.com/2015/03/06/elizabeth_warren_causes_dc_freakout_why_the_liberal_hero_has_elite_washington_in_hysterics/
RiverLover
(7,830 posts)I hope it gets a gazillion clicks over at the Salon site, so they will know this issue is HOT and maybe they and others will give it more exposure.
We need Democrats to be Democrats & represent US, not corporate profits over people!!!
Thanks Triana!! You post the best stuff.
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Autumn
(47,006 posts)while the rest of the people live on stagnant wages and income.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)and that's what has them scared. They know that Sen Warren is but one person and they can handle that, but if one is paying attention (not to the corporate media) there are Populist fires burning all around the country. All around the world in fact. That's what has them scared. They knew this day would come. It's in the script for capitalism.
djean111
(14,255 posts)cannot see - what is coming is not personality based, is not the "pick" of the Third Way/DNC - it is ideas and a vision that is what the Democratic Party used to be - actual principles, for the people, not grimly determined corporate win at all costs and then fuck the people who voted "D".
Here is what they don't understand - Warren and Sanders could quit politics tomorrow - and what Hillary stands for and is paid by will still be unpalatable.
IMO O'Malley is just another corporate "Look! There's a challenger!" who may just have always been slated for VP.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)Nice!