Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Rhiannon12866

(253,727 posts)
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 01:31 AM Yesterday

This federal judge ruled against Trump. Then the death threats rolled in - 60 Minutes



Federal judges say criticism from Trump can put their safety at risk. The White House says Trump "understands the dangers of political violence." - Aired on 03/01/2026.

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
This federal judge ruled against Trump. Then the death threats rolled in - 60 Minutes (Original Post) Rhiannon12866 Yesterday OP
A Republican South Carolina Judge's home burned down in '25 after she ruled against Trump Botany Yesterday #1
I remember that. And now we have "swatting" and other threats against judges and congressional Democrats Rhiannon12866 Yesterday #2
Sheesh... "he'll be gone soon"??? calimary Yesterday #3
This was when he faced impeachment over the insurrection and Biden/Harris were scheduled to take office Rhiannon12866 Yesterday #4
He's becoming more pathetic by the hour! calimary Yesterday #5
Every time we think it's the worse he can get, he managed to top his previous criminality Rhiannon12866 Yesterday #6
Yep. calimary Yesterday #7
Stochastic Terrorism Martin Eden Yesterday #8

Botany

(77,003 posts)
1. A Republican South Carolina Judge's home burned down in '25 after she ruled against Trump
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 01:50 AM
Yesterday

Last edited Mon Mar 2, 2026, 08:19 AM - Edit history (1)

Rhiannon12866

(253,727 posts)
2. I remember that. And now we have "swatting" and other threats against judges and congressional Democrats
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 02:01 AM
Yesterday

I have Liz Cheney's book and she tells about January 6th and the impeachment vote in the House. She said if the voting was anonymous, the yes votes would have been overwhelming, but too many House Republicans were just too afraid of the threats that they and their families would receive. One excuse was "he'll be gone soon..." So much for that.

calimary

(89,629 posts)
3. Sheesh... "he'll be gone soon"???
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 02:08 AM
Yesterday

Do they know something we don’t? Or are they just stalling for (more) time?

Rhiannon12866

(253,727 posts)
4. This was when he faced impeachment over the insurrection and Biden/Harris were scheduled to take office
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 02:17 AM
Yesterday

How he managed to come back to serve a second term after that boggles the mind. And we know now that he's still desperate prove that he actually "won" in 2020.

Rhiannon12866

(253,727 posts)
6. Every time we think it's the worse he can get, he managed to top his previous criminality
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 02:31 AM
Yesterday

I sure didn't have invading Iran on my bingo card - I still remember the hostage crisis and their war with Iraq - which they would have easily won without Reagan's aid to Iraq. They've 3 1/2 times larger and more populous with guys willing to meet their deaths and be transported to their heavenly life. That's what we learned at the time.

Martin Eden

(15,520 posts)
8. Stochastic Terrorism
Mon Mar 2, 2026, 06:49 AM
Yesterday

This is a deliberate strategy to neuter the judicial branch established in our constitution through intimidation and violence.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Cable News Clips»This federal judge ruled ...