Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Liberal YouTubers
Related: About this forumLet's talk about a veto and school funding until the year 2425.... - Belle of the Ranch
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Let's talk about a veto and school funding until the year 2425.... - Belle of the Ranch (Original Post)
TexasTowelie
Sunday
OP
P{robably nothing as it will likely be reversed by then. In the meantime, the expiration date is set at 2425. nt
Gore1FL
Sunday
#4
brush
(59,649 posts)1. 2425? Four centuries from now? She's needs to re-shoot this video.
Gore1FL
(22,426 posts)2. 2425 is the accurate year based on what the governor did. nt
brush
(59,649 posts)3. And what did he do that will matter four centuries from now?
Gore1FL
(22,426 posts)4. P{robably nothing as it will likely be reversed by then. In the meantime, the expiration date is set at 2425. nt
brush
(59,649 posts)5. Hope so as that seems to be an arbitrary expiration date to me that means little. 4 centuries away?
GregariousGroundhog
(7,578 posts)6. This is an example of Wisconsin's "Frankenstein Veto".
The voters approved a constitutional amendment a couple of years back which prevents the governor from crafting sentences from parts of two or more sentences and from crafting words by vetoing individual letters. The amendment said nothing about crafting new numbers. The governor wanted to make the school funding increase permanent and so he vetoed a bunch of words and letters until he got the numbers "2", "4", "2" and "5" next to each other.
The Wisconsin supreme Court just ruled 4-3 that this is permissable and if the legislature doesn't like it, they need to pass a new constitutional amendment to fix their oversight.
Gore1FL
(22,426 posts)7. You can't be choosy if you are exploiting veto language.
I get the impression you didn;t watch the video.
brush
(59,649 posts)8. Four centuries? Kinda silly.