Fortune favorability/unfavorability poll, if you trust it, food for thought and action. And some head-scratching.

[usonian]

https://fortune.com/2026/03/09/ai-opinion-poll-democrats-iran-war-president-donald-trump/

TLDR:

Only net-positives are: Pope Leo and Stephen Colbert!
AOC is 5th, ahead of Jabba the Orange Hutt.
Bottom 4: ICE, AI, The Democratic Party and Iran.
Rubio and Vance have yet to F*ck up massively, but that's coming real soon.



Colbert for president? Silly, a TV personality could never win ....

[kimbutgar]

1. This poll is bs!

[usonian]

2. It looked weird, so I qualified it.

I'll delete if it's too lost in space.

Found on Hacker News, where articles on AI are tops.
Both favorable and doomsday.

[kimbutgar]

3. Keep up your post !

I had a good laugh at some of the poll numbers!

[usonian]

4. Indeed, Pope Leo probably qualifies to run for president.

I do disagree on a few matters, though!!!

Raised Catholic, I was not the ideal kid.

I saw "meat" on the tuna can and asked my mom to call the parish priest (Father Carvelli) for clarification.

IT'S MEAT.



I'm just trouble!

[EarlG]

5. The thing about the Democratic Party's low approval rating is that

it does not seem to be affecting the outcome of any actual elections we've been seeing around the country.

If favorability equaled election results, then Republicans would not be losing seats in red districts, and we would not be seeing wild swings from Republican to Democrat in all kinds of races all over the country.

The reason the Democratic Party is unpopular is that many Democrats are upset that they don't see the Democratic Party as a whole fighting the Trump's administration's depravity.

But the US political system isn't designed to allow for a particularly effective political opposition. When out of power, there is no "shadow cabinet," and there is no de facto leader of the opposition. People expect the House and Senate minority leaders to fulfill the leadership roles, but their duties are much more precisely aimed at legislative outcomes than political ones.

The years from 2021-2025 were an anomaly in American politics, because during those years the Republican Party actually had a de facto opposition leader -- Donald Trump. Immediately after losing in 2020, he filed to run again, and he basically ran a presidential campaign for four years. There were no serious primary opponents or serious opposition -- he was the leader of the GOP for the entire four years that they were in the wilderness. The Democrats do not have such a figurehead (nor is an opposition figurehead a normal state of affairs).

And so Democrats are generally upset that they're not seeing leadership from the party right now.

But... that isn't going to stop Democrats from going out in droves to vote, because ultimately that is the only recourse they have. In the US political system, opposition power comes from the voters who can go out every two years and change the system if they don't like the one they have. And boy oh boy, do voters seem to not like the system we have right now.

That's why I don't think this is even going to be a case of voters "holding their noses" this year to vote for Democrats. That's the sort of thing that happens when a party is unpopular with its own voters when already in power. It is Republicans who will have to hold their noses to vote this year, not Democrats.

This year, even if Democrats don't think that the Democratic Party as a whole has put up enough of a fight against Trump, they know that the way to take away Trump's power is to vote Republicans out of office, and the only way to do that is to vote for Democrats. And given the pattern of election results over the last year, people seem extremely energized to do just that.

[usonian]

6. Good observations. Candidates are winning, even if the party is ... who knows what the party is doing?

I look at AOC's popularity and this ...