General Discussion

SickOfTheOnePct

(7,462 posts)

42. As I told you before

Reply to hlthe2b (Reply #39)

Fri Jan 17, 2025, 02:43 PM

12 hrs ago

I have read it. I've also read what RBG said, and I've also read the DOJ opinion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

60 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Statement from Vice President Kamala Harris on the Equal Rights Amendment [View all] Quiet Em 14 hrs ago OP

The condensed version: About damn time! jls4561 14 hrs ago #1

If it's now established as the "law of the land" , when does it go into effect? MichMan 13 hrs ago #2

Never. progressoid 13 hrs ago #3

Well, I have more respect for Laurence Tribe than any other constitutional lawyer and he says you are wrong: hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #10

RBG said it needed to start over MichMan 12 hrs ago #13

I loved RBG but she is no longer relevant, having not heard the argument that Tribe presents. hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #14

Just so I'm clear SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #16

She did not live to hear it litigated. She was a tremendous SCOTUS justice, but not a constitutional scholar/litigant hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #18

We'll just agree to disagree SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #23

that you diminish Laurence Tribe says all I want to hear from you. I said she was not a constitutional scholar litigant. hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #26

I did read his opinion SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #27

Can you read? I said RBG was not a constiutional scholar litigant. She was not. She was a wonderful SCOTUS justice hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #31

She argued six cases before the Supreme Court n/t SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #32

Not a single one remotely related to ERA or abortion or anything related. Tribe, on the other hand has argued 36 hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #38

But that isn't what you said SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #41

Why are you assuming glee? SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #34

Your willingness to devote this much energy into promoting the meme the RW has advanced since VA's vote hlthe2b 8 hrs ago #45

You said SickOfTheOnePct 8 hrs ago #47

Being called on your posts, attitudes and disgusting disregard for the rights of others struck a nerve, did it? hlthe2b 8 hrs ago #48

Believing SickOfTheOnePct 8 hrs ago #49

You said it was settled. I have at no time said it should not be litigated, just as Tribe has made the case. hlthe2b 8 hrs ago #51

Finally changing your tune... hlthe2b 8 hrs ago #53

You're a trip SickOfTheOnePct 8 hrs ago #55

Your denial is record-setting. I'll give you that. hlthe2b 8 hrs ago #57

😂😂😂 SickOfTheOnePct 8 hrs ago #58

Justice Ginsburg would be celebrating today. Quiet Em 12 hrs ago #33

not like Larry has had a good track record this past decade thebigidea 11 hrs ago #43

Tribe and Sullivan conveniently ignore the current makeup of the Supreme Court. progressoid 7 hrs ago #60

According to them, it's now Polybius 13 hrs ago #4

It's in effect right now. Quiet Em 13 hrs ago #5

According to the Associated Press and Boston Globe, the 1982 deadline for it to be ratified has passed. TheRickles 13 hrs ago #6

AP writers/editors are not constitutional lawyers. Hell they are hardly reporters. See Laurence Tribe on this hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #11

I submitted this AP story before Tribe's commentary was released. I'll defer to him. :-) TheRickles 11 hrs ago #44

how were they able to put a deadline on it? eShirl 12 hrs ago #22

There is a strong legal argument that the deadline itself was unconstituional Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #25

I agree 100% that there are strong legal arguments SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #30

I said elsewhere that Biden's action should be celebrated even if it doesn't hold Wiz Imp 12 hrs ago #35

Agree n/t SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #37

Oh, so NOW you agree there is a case to be made and should be settled via litigation. After what, two dozen posts hlthe2b 8 hrs ago #46

I've said all along that it will be SickOfTheOnePct 8 hrs ago #50

Not to me, you haven't. Only a constant stream of memes about it being settled, Tribe has no case to make, etc. etc. hlthe2b 8 hrs ago #52

I've posted no memes SickOfTheOnePct 8 hrs ago #54

Proving once again you never read Tribe's argument given you spiel the meme about the date when there is hlthe2b 8 hrs ago #56

This case law? Dillon vs Gloss 1921 MichMan 8 hrs ago #59

I love this so much!!! AllyCat 12 hrs ago #7

me too. Quiet Em 12 hrs ago #8

Lots of doomsayers here. I choose to celebrate! AllyCat 12 hrs ago #9

Yes. I keep posting Laurence Tribe's assessment of this (that it is now law) and they keep poo pooing HIM! hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #12

Unbelievable how many people are upset that the ERA is now the law of the land. Quiet Em 12 hrs ago #19

I think the misogyny has become embedded... hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #20

Unbelievable that you equate SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #24

I don't think anyone here is upset, I think we're realistic about what this means EdmondDantes_ 12 hrs ago #29

I started a thread on this. bdamomma 12 hrs ago #28

President Biden's announcement will certainly melm00se 12 hrs ago #15

Exactly SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #17

You have not even bothered to read constiutional scholar Laurence Tribe's argument that defeats yours. hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #21

Why do you continue to assume SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #36

Because they express it and refuse to read a knowledgable assessment that differs from their own uninformed one? hlthe2b 12 hrs ago #39

As I told you before SickOfTheOnePct 12 hrs ago #42

See Wiz Imp's response, #25. spooky3 12 hrs ago #40