Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Statement from Vice President Kamala Harris on the Equal Rights Amendment [View all]hlthe2b
(107,265 posts)45. Your willingness to devote this much energy into promoting the meme the RW has advanced since VA's vote
-- that it is all settled-- is so damned telling. You may as well just tell the "little women of DU and elsewhere should just not worry our little heads about it" nor listen to one of our nation's most celebrated and successful constitutional scholars who supports fighting for its ratification--in SCOTUS or whatever it takes. Your daughters deserve better and far more support than what you are advancing.
No skin in the game makes it quite easy, doesn't it?
I am so reminded of Dr. King's assessment of the "Fair Day supporters" he faced among the southern white populace as eloquently put in his Birmingham jail letter:
Such similarities :
that the Negros great stumbling block in his stride toward freedom is not the White Citizens Councilor or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate, who is more devoted to order than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says: I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I cannot agree with your methods of direct action; who paternalistically believes he can set the timetable for another mans freedom; who lives by a mythical concept of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait for a more convenient season.
The great enemy of justice are those moderates who feign outrage at societal injustice, but whose outrage conveniently disappears when real change threatens their status. These moderates are more comfortable leaving unchallenged the assumed moral authority of certain institutions, traditions and practices that are the purveyors of injustice rather than confronting their own role in maintaining these institutions. The hard truth is that the comfort of the status quo is always preferable to pursuing the demands of justice.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
60 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Statement from Vice President Kamala Harris on the Equal Rights Amendment [View all]
Quiet Em
14 hrs ago
OP
If it's now established as the "law of the land" , when does it go into effect?
MichMan
14 hrs ago
#2
Well, I have more respect for Laurence Tribe than any other constitutional lawyer and he says you are wrong:
hlthe2b
13 hrs ago
#10
I loved RBG but she is no longer relevant, having not heard the argument that Tribe presents.
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#14
She did not live to hear it litigated. She was a tremendous SCOTUS justice, but not a constitutional scholar/litigant
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#18
that you diminish Laurence Tribe says all I want to hear from you. I said she was not a constitutional scholar litigant.
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#26
Can you read? I said RBG was not a constiutional scholar litigant. She was not. She was a wonderful SCOTUS justice
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#31
Not a single one remotely related to ERA or abortion or anything related. Tribe, on the other hand has argued 36
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#38
Your willingness to devote this much energy into promoting the meme the RW has advanced since VA's vote
hlthe2b
9 hrs ago
#45
Being called on your posts, attitudes and disgusting disregard for the rights of others struck a nerve, did it?
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#48
You said it was settled. I have at no time said it should not be litigated, just as Tribe has made the case.
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#51
Tribe and Sullivan conveniently ignore the current makeup of the Supreme Court.
progressoid
7 hrs ago
#60
According to the Associated Press and Boston Globe, the 1982 deadline for it to be ratified has passed.
TheRickles
13 hrs ago
#6
AP writers/editors are not constitutional lawyers. Hell they are hardly reporters. See Laurence Tribe on this
hlthe2b
13 hrs ago
#11
I submitted this AP story before Tribe's commentary was released. I'll defer to him. :-)
TheRickles
11 hrs ago
#44
There is a strong legal argument that the deadline itself was unconstituional
Wiz Imp
12 hrs ago
#25
I said elsewhere that Biden's action should be celebrated even if it doesn't hold
Wiz Imp
12 hrs ago
#35
Oh, so NOW you agree there is a case to be made and should be settled via litigation. After what, two dozen posts
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#46
Not to me, you haven't. Only a constant stream of memes about it being settled, Tribe has no case to make, etc. etc.
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#52
Proving once again you never read Tribe's argument given you spiel the meme about the date when there is
hlthe2b
8 hrs ago
#56
Yes. I keep posting Laurence Tribe's assessment of this (that it is now law) and they keep poo pooing HIM!
hlthe2b
13 hrs ago
#12
Unbelievable how many people are upset that the ERA is now the law of the land.
Quiet Em
12 hrs ago
#19
I don't think anyone here is upset, I think we're realistic about what this means
EdmondDantes_
12 hrs ago
#29
You have not even bothered to read constiutional scholar Laurence Tribe's argument that defeats yours.
hlthe2b
12 hrs ago
#21