Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(3,105 posts)

10. She doesn't see her duty that way

Sat Jan 18, 2025, 09:16 PM

Jan 18

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

23 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The ERA Solidifies Women's Rights in the Constitution as the 28th Amendment [View all] boston bean Jan 17 OP

Will the courts support this amendment? Irish_Dem Jan 17 #1

She cannot deny it. She has a duty at this time boston bean Jan 18 #9

She doesn't see her duty that way Seeking Serenity Jan 18 #10

The court cannot overturn a constitutional amendment. n/t valleyrogue Jan 19 #14

True SickOfTheOnePct Jan 19 #20

I read that there was a deadline (1986 I believe).... Think. Again. Jan 17 #4

I have this same question. snot Jan 17 #5

No, you are not mistaken. The Amendment is dead hueymahl Jan 17 #6

Excellent point! Think. Again. Jan 17 #7

You don't know what you are talking about. It never was "dead." n/t valleyrogue Jan 18 #12

I hope you are correct hueymahl Jan 19 #23

It's valid. People need to stop with the "time limit" nonsense. valleyrogue Jan 18 #11

You've said this repeatedly SickOfTheOnePct Jan 19 #15

The article by Tribe & Sullivan is very clear. Link here... Hekate Jan 19 #16

Yes I've read the Tribe article SickOfTheOnePct Jan 19 #19

You are correct, as I understand it. wnylib Jan 19 #21

Exactly SickOfTheOnePct Jan 19 #22