General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Laurence Tribe - The Equal Rights Amendment at Long Last [View all]muriel_volestrangler
(102,943 posts)Scenario: Congress suggests an amendment to raise the voting age to 30.
1 quarter of states ratify it, and 3/4 say "no, that's pants".
The 1/4 thinks better, and says "on second thoughts, this is a silly amendment. Let's not go there".
But a different quarter of the states decides it's a good idea after all, and holds new votes to ratify.
Repeat that - those who had been in favour change their vote, and a different quarter decide it's a good idea after all.
By now, three quarters of states have, at some time, been in favour, though at any one moment, a quarter or less have been in favour.
But under Tribe's arrangement, that counts as three quarters ratifying it, and so an immensely unpopular amendment is passed.
What a shitshow that would be. Why claim that must be the way to amend the constitution? It's just a way of being undemocratic.
Edit history
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)