Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Johnny2X2X

(23,681 posts)
13. It's the lack of wage growth to follow gains in productivity
Wed May 14, 2025, 01:33 PM
May 2025

Quantitative easing (printing money) didn't realy cause this.

Basically, labor created wealth at an exponential rate for 40 years, but the labor didn't share in those wealth gains. An hour of labor in the auto industry in the 1980s maybe produced $150 of value and the laborer got $30 an hour plus $25 an hour in benefits, so he kept $55 of the $150 his labor created in value. Today, an hour of labor in the auto undustry maybe produces $500 of value and that auto worker is keeping the same $55 an hour for himself (if he's lucky). That other $350 an hour went to executives and shareholders. Numbers just a generalization to illustrate the point. And some of this increased productivity is automation for sure, labor didn't get a piece of it at all.

Basically, we've gotten better and mopre efficient in everything we do and in everything we make, those gains made the top 1% into kings while the bottom 60% struggled.

Recommendations

2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Meanwhile, America's billionaires - the greediest humans on earth - are set to "earn" trillions. Initech May 2025 #1
But it'll all trickle down Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin May 2025 #4
We'll get our reward in the sweet bye-and-bye LastDemocratInSC May 2025 #10
It's exactly how cults recruit new members. Initech May 2025 #12
"The Preacher and the Slave"...an old union song. keep_left May 2025 #17
The day we working people are finally convinced and we rise as one, then It's on that day billionaires become obsolete. Magoo48 May 2025 #14
Agreed! Billionaires should be obsolete. Initech May 2025 #15
That's why I can never understand why so many magas vote repuke and are in that 60% category kimbutgar May 2025 #2
They just want everyone doing as poorly as they are n/t leftstreet May 2025 #8
Interested to see the data for years Johnny2X2X May 2025 #3
It's not the direct decrease in 60% living standard it's printing money for the rich that eventually lowers it. uponit7771 May 2025 #6
It's the lack of wage growth to follow gains in productivity Johnny2X2X May 2025 #13
Interesting point, wage growth **RECENTLY** has been above average that's cause it was trash... uponit7771 May 2025 #16
And far too many don't earn at all. OldBaldy1701E May 2025 #5
USA! USA! USA! LudwigPastorius May 2025 #7
They fear social unrest from middle class, but not the poors leftstreet May 2025 #9
The Repuplican Party Mission Statement. twodogsbarking May 2025 #11
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Most Americans don't earn...»Reply #13