Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Harris Walz 2028? [View all]betsuni
(28,109 posts)47. "In October, O'Malley Dillon and Lorraine Voles, Harris's chief of staff, had gone to the White House
to tell Jeff Zients, Biden's chief of staff, that Harris needed to break with the president -- and, in effect, ask him for permission. As one aide put it, 'to say, you know, she's got to do this because we've got to win. And they were all like, "Yeah, do whatever you have to fucking do to win!"' Not only had Zients given the Harris team his blessing, but in a phone call Biden himself told Harris that she should do whatever she had to do, say whatever she wanted to say -- his feelings wouldn't be hurt."
Chris Whipple, "Uncharted"
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Racism was a major issue in 2008 and 2012 too. But it didnt cost Obama the elections
SSJVegeta
Jun 8
#59
Many women, especially in the South, are not "comfortable voting for a woman for president"
Iris
Jun 8
#58
It's not that either Clinton or Harris were unpopular; they weren't unpopular with Democrats.
Ocelot II
Jun 8
#38
Myth that the majority of Americans are secretly populist progressives yearning for economic class revolution
betsuni
Jun 8
#49
"In October, O'Malley Dillon and Lorraine Voles, Harris's chief of staff, had gone to the White House
betsuni
Jun 8
#47
I think one thing that could have helped Harris is if Biden would have assigned her
karynnj
Jun 8
#9
Like it or not, we will not win if a woman is atop the ticket. This backwards country will not elect a female president.
LonePirate
Jun 8
#4
Women make up a majority ofbthe country and a woman won the popular vote in 2016.
SSJVegeta
Jun 8
#7
Just because misogny exists, doesnt mean that a fascist was elected solely because of it.
SSJVegeta
Jun 8
#19
And what do you say about all of the women who failed to vote for Harris, and/or voted for Trump
SSJVegeta
Jun 8
#21
No. Many didn't vote for her because she's a woman. Others didn't vote for her because she's black.
Scrivener7
Jun 8
#22
If sexism was the reason, Clinton wouldnt have won the popular vote. If racsm was the reason, Obama would never
SSJVegeta
Jun 8
#27
Nope. Run a middle aged, white, protestant, straight man and we'll win. Without
Scrivener7
Jun 8
#28
That's nice. But it's ridiculous to say you guarantee such a thing. Have a lovely evening.
Scrivener7
Jun 8
#52
I could not agree with you MORE!! I believe the torch is starting to be passed to AOC & she IS the future of our party!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 8
#44
Me too!! As long as we stick to our progressive principles, we are going to kick some serious ass in 2028!!
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 8
#26
It might be unprecedented but the combination of Harris/Walz, with sufficient time to campaign, would be a powerful one
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 8
#45
I will vote for whom ever is on the ticket. My first choices are rarely if ever the nominees nt
Javaman
Jun 8
#32