Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Dan

(5,004 posts)
27. I was listening to a pod-caster video
Sun Jan 18, 2026, 02:54 PM
Yesterday

He made some interesting points - which I hope will not be perceived as an attack on Democrats, but what he said resonated with me.

The primary point he made that the GOP is slowly but surely stripping rights away from the working class, via policy, misinformation, combined with racism and misogyny. Once they strip some rights away, the Democratic party resumes power and slowly but surely reacquires some of the rights that have been stripped away. Some, but not all. So, gradually the nation is trending rightward.

The problem is that both parties are somewhat beholden to their donors - and they share the some of the same donors. That is one of the primary reason we don't have universal health care. The Healthcare lobby has more power than we the people combined with the additional power that Citizens United bestowed on Corporations.

This Pod-caster advocated for a third party that would benefit the workers Or a real Democratic party leadership that would actively fight for the working class without regard for the donor base. People like Congressperson Crockett, AOC, etc., those that are leading the charge and have media savvy to counteract the right-wing media.

It was interesting because I have a friend that is currently trying to form a third party for some of the same reasons that this pod-caster made. While very progressive he has turned off the Democratic party due to what he perceives as their half-ass measures to address the needs of the working person. And, unfortunately he believes that our party is more interested in their fund raising over the people. He believes that the old people in the party are more interested in their seats (and will do nothing that jeopardizes the seats) than benefiting the people.

On parts I do have to agree - I think that the party would be better served by pushing more of the younger generation of Democratic leaders than catering to the needs/beliefs of the elderly members of the party. I do believe that change is in the air and that the younger people are going to lead our party in changing and finding news ways. The young people will fight while the elders seek compromise (with the exception of Nancy P., who I hope will live forever as a demonstrator of a fighter). I do question whether compromise is the way forward given what we are currently experiencing and the character of the GOP.

Like I said, I hope that this won't be perceived as an attack on the Democratic party but maybe something to think about as we go forward.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Why can't Democrats just say it: [View all] Chasstev365 Yesterday OP
They can do that. Just saying the GOP is standing in the way of better healthcare, affordability & stability works too. dutch777 Yesterday #1
There is so much low hanging fruit that we are not picking. The messaging Scrivener7 Yesterday #2
I stand boggled with you, S7. yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #39
Maybe they'll suggest Republicans wear body cams n/t leftstreet Yesterday #3
Jason Crow said it, gab13by13 Yesterday #4
I don't think we can wait that long. Jan 2027 if a new Congress is seated. paleotn Yesterday #12
That Alaska airborn unit's planned deployment to Minnesota is not actually for Minnesota. Scrivener7 2 hrs ago #56
Again, we are waiting on something that may not happen. hamsterjill Yesterday #20
Post removed Post removed 8 hrs ago #44
I believe taking a stand now and fighting them Hey Joe 4 hrs ago #51
No, NO!! We must focus on the Abundance Agenda, because that's what our consultants said!!! hatrack Yesterday #5
I guess Hakeem Jefferies, Mark Kelly, Elissa Slotkin, AOC, et al. didn't get the memo? paleotn Yesterday #11
Also Jamie Raskin, Eric Swalwell, and many others ShazzieB Yesterday #25
I get tired of that particular Dem bashing line too BaronChocula 21 hrs ago #37
Evidently one can be a "supporter" giving "constructive criticism" by lying about what Democrats do/say and do not. betsuni 3 hrs ago #54
You mean the Elissa Slotkin choie 3 hrs ago #52
We do Democrats always have to present a positive message and agenda that the corporate media ignores? Chasstev365 Yesterday #16
Fire all the consultants. yellow dahlia 20 hrs ago #40
I'm a Democrat and I'm saying, as are you too, I assume. Some elected Dems are saying it too-- like Jasmine Crockett! LymphocyteLover Yesterday #6
Sometimes Katcat Yesterday #7
Really no downside to much these days. paleotn Yesterday #8
Coloring within the lines for decorum's sake only guarantees Democrats march in an orderly fashion to the camps. Efilroft Sul Yesterday #9
We say that all the time creeksneakers2 Yesterday #10
Schumer: "The bottom line is, Senate Republicans continually fall in line behind Donald Trump, no matter how reckless, betsuni Yesterday #13
You can be a supporter choie 3 hrs ago #53
Why don't Democrats use some random phrasing that came out of your head? Gee, I don't know? tritsofme Yesterday #14
Reread my original post: You missed my point entirely Chasstev365 Yesterday #17
It's just not true. Democrats denounce Republicans for falling behind Trump all the time. tritsofme Yesterday #19
Yes, it's not true. Gaslights make it pretty dim in here. betsuni Yesterday #30
Yes - the problem with the Republican party is REPUBLICANS, not just Trump. Beartracks Yesterday #15
RULES ONLY APPLY TO DEMS, RIGHT? Exp Yesterday #18
ANY MEANS NECESSARY czarjak Yesterday #21
Doesn't seem very productive. mdbl Yesterday #22
Like the LEO's are afraid of breaking a nail single-handedly apprehending a person, I think our Democratic leaders are LiberalArkie Yesterday #23
Almost half the country still support Trump!!! kirby Yesterday #24
That's what my husband keeps saying Tree Lady 20 hrs ago #41
A lot of media make sure many still support him. They hide the truth of his mental illness so they have 'access' Attilatheblond 8 hrs ago #45
Dems are channeling Merrick Garland Tetrachloride Yesterday #26
I was listening to a pod-caster video Dan Yesterday #27
"This Pod-caster advocated for a third party..." MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #35
Don't remember Dan Yesterday #36
The Democratic Party has historically been the larger of two parties Warpy Yesterday #28
I am hearing dems say a lot and the press ignores them. I have heard great speeches in congress. But, people keep mucifer Yesterday #29
I've been wondering what has happened to Princess. She used to be able to rein in Daddy Dearest a bit and surely Vinca Yesterday #31
She won't do anything to slow the money boats docking at her shore. Attilatheblond 8 hrs ago #46
They are saying it MorbidButterflyTat Yesterday #32
These "Why don't Democrats stop Republicans?" whines are boring. A milquetoast bash. betsuni 5 hrs ago #49
We need someone to write a strongly worded letter. doc03 Yesterday #33
Democrats have said things like that and more but I am wondering JI7 Yesterday #34
Democrats like us have been saying that for more than a decade. So has the Democratic minority in the Senate and the Martin68 20 hrs ago #38
It's why.... RetiredParatrooper 9 hrs ago #42
Just three things. usonian 9 hrs ago #43
a great question samsingh 7 hrs ago #47
Some are. barbtries 5 hrs ago #48
Chris Murphy should be the Senate minority leader. Scrivener7 2 hrs ago #55
Not a chance of that until the next Congress. maxsolomon 2 hrs ago #58
Yeah, I know. Scrivener7 2 hrs ago #59
I was pretty bad at math and don't get the New Division Torchlight 5 hrs ago #50
They are saying it. maxsolomon 2 hrs ago #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why can't Democrats just ...»Reply #27