Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WHAT THE Fu*k CHUCK [View all]Wild blueberry
(8,174 posts)10. Schumer's allegiance is to his financial backers
That's it. Not us.
What used to work in previous Congresses no longer does, since before 2016. He appears not to have noticed this.
Kindly step aside.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
15 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
70 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
We MUST get rid of Schumer and all the rest of the Third Way institutionalists. The market is NOT beneign, it will NOT
PatrickforB
Friday
#14
The why is obvious. The 1%ers have bought the Congress, SCOTUS and the Presidency.
flashman13
Friday
#23
You're quite correct, but I use the words "secret police" deliberately, because
Maru Kitteh
Friday
#43
Darned right!!! Same for Jeffries. I'm so fucking TIRED of these institutionalists letting Wall Street screw us over
PatrickforB
Friday
#17
Yep ... and Ds have needed to be that for more than 40 years now imo. A long 40+ years ...
KPN
Friday
#37
he was there promoting the CHIPS and Science Act that HE and BIDEN had helped enact
bigtree
Friday
#7
And instead of shaming Lutnick for politicizing the event -- as Lutnick would certainly have done to him
KPN
Friday
#45
Yes, really. In case you haven't noticed, you don't have a monopoly on what is the correct point of view.
KPN
Friday
#51
Well, a semblance of bi-partisanship in the Harry Reid days. I'll give you that, but for far too many years now,
KPN
Friday
#39
I'm pretty sure he'll whip votes to fund ICE. More of that bipartisanship don't ya know.
Autumn
Friday
#12
Well, I for one am proud of you for taking that stand. There's some cognitive dissonance here at DU sometimes it seems.
KPN
Friday
#46
"Anything could happen." I think that "anything" is already happening. And you're absolutely right.
Scrivener7
Friday
#64
I understand and appreciate the sentiment; and agree that everyone who isn't delivering should be primaried,
KPN
Friday
#42
Yes it is, and I added your thread on this which corrects that intentional misrepresentation. It is sad that some are
lostincalifornia
Friday
#30
IMHO neither of the congressional leader are equip to deal with the delusional maniac in the White House
usaf-vet
Friday
#31