General Discussion

KPN

(17,198 posts)

37. Yep ... and Ds have needed to be that for more than 40 years now imo. A long 40+ years ...

Reply to PatrickforB (Reply #17)

Fri Jan 23, 2026, 12:25 PM

Jan 23

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

vanessa_ca

70 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WHAT THE Fu*k CHUCK [View all] 4bonhoffer Jan 23 OP

Bipartisanship with Evil is Evil. dalton99a Jan 23 #1

The Big Blunder was back in March gab13by13 Jan 23 #2

Yep. dalton99a Jan 23 #3

We MUST get rid of Schumer and all the rest of the Third Way institutionalists. The market is NOT beneign, it will NOT PatrickforB Jan 23 #14

The why is obvious. The 1%ers have bought the Congress, SCOTUS and the Presidency. flashman13 Jan 23 #23

Jeffries too? ananda Jan 23 #32

Roger that! He is part of the stern concerned letter crew. flashman13 Jan 23 #34

You speak my mind perfectly Patrick -- as usual. KPN Jan 23 #33

and not releasing all the files on trump when we had the chance samsingh Jan 23 #16

+1 leftstreet Jan 23 #25

Prediction: YES. He's going to vote to FUND ICE. Maru Kitteh Jan 23 #4

I'm in with you JustAnotherGen Jan 23 #13

And a domestic terrorist organization ... as is the whole frigging administration. KPN Jan 23 #35

You're quite correct, but I use the words "secret police" deliberately, because Maru Kitteh Jan 23 #43

Darned right!!! Same for Jeffries. I'm so fucking TIRED of these institutionalists letting Wall Street screw us over PatrickforB Jan 23 #17

Yep ... and Ds have needed to be that for more than 40 years now imo. A long 40+ years ... KPN Jan 23 #37

Will he vote to fund ICE next? kentuck Jan 23 #5

Post removed Post removed Jan 23 #6

he was there promoting the CHIPS and Science Act that HE and BIDEN had helped enact bigtree Jan 23 #7

A bit off topic, but why is Gaza in quotes? AloeVera Jan 23 #27

I dunno ... principle? KPN Jan 23 #38

do folks here like it when Democrats pass legislation that helps create jobs? bigtree Jan 23 #41

And instead of shaming Lutnick for politicizing the event -- as Lutnick would certainly have done to him KPN Jan 23 #45

he's not there to divert from the accomplishment from his state bigtree Jan 23 #49

Yes, really. In case you haven't noticed, you don't have a monopoly on what is the correct point of view. KPN Jan 23 #51

at least I'm not promoting the lie that Schumer covered here for Lutnick bigtree Jan 23 #52

I'll give you that, but do want to point out that the OP was based KPN Jan 23 #53

He thinks that some "old school" Republicans will come around. Happy Hoosier Jan 23 #8

Back in the Harry Reid days, bi-partisanship was possible... haele Jan 23 #9

Well, a semblance of bi-partisanship in the Harry Reid days. I'll give you that, but for far too many years now, KPN Jan 23 #39

Do you like Democratic initiatives that some republicans decide to support bigtree Jan 23 #50

Schumer's allegiance is to his financial backers Wild blueberry Jan 23 #10

Chuck bdamomma Jan 23 #11

I'm pretty sure he'll whip votes to fund ICE. More of that bipartisanship don't ya know. Autumn Jan 23 #12

In a word Mr.Bee Jan 23 #15

I thought he was still on his book tour. littlemissmartypants Jan 23 #18

We have to "keep our powder dry." SergeStorms Jan 23 #19

Agree completely Grim Chieftain Jan 23 #20

So did your post get removed? Inquiring minds want to know. KPN Jan 23 #40

Yes it did Grim Chieftain Jan 23 #44

Well, I for one am proud of you for taking that stand. There's some cognitive dissonance here at DU sometimes it seems. KPN Jan 23 #46

Thanks so much for your reply Grim Chieftain Jan 23 #47

"Anything could happen." I think that "anything" is already happening. And you're absolutely right. Scrivener7 Jan 23 #64

Thank you Grim Chieftain Jan 23 #65

Primary everyone. Only a few incumbents are in my keep list. Tetrachloride Jan 23 #21

here's a fucking clue bigtree Jan 23 #24

i tend to think we're in a different generation Tetrachloride Jan 23 #55

I understand and appreciate the sentiment; and agree that everyone who isn't delivering should be primaried, KPN Jan 23 #42

ty. more exceptions that prove the rule Tetrachloride Jan 23 #56

this op is based on a lie that Schumer defended Lutnick bigtree Jan 23 #22

Isn't this thread going against the DU policy Layzeebeaver Jan 23 #26

That doesn't seem to be a thing anymore. MorbidButterflyTat Jan 23 #62

Thanks. I always have to scan for this string of posts to get the real Nixie Saturday #67

Yes it is, and I added your thread on this which corrects that intentional misrepresentation. It is sad that some are lostincalifornia Jan 23 #30

Reinstate... alimbalt Jan 23 #28

Only problem is that ISN'T WHAT HAPPENED. lostincalifornia Jan 23 #29

IMHO neither of the congressional leader are equip to deal with the delusional maniac in the White House usaf-vet Jan 23 #31

Chuckie gave up the crown. usonian Jan 23 #36

100 plus recs on a goddamn lie about our own Democratic leaders bigtree Jan 23 #48

Thank you, bigtree. murielm99 Jan 23 #54

Hm. mr715 Jan 23 #57

Oh, my. The profundity. murielm99 Jan 23 #66

We're supposed to explode with rage and abandon the Democratic Party because ... Schumer and Jeffries? That's it? betsuni Saturday #68

Thank you LetMyPeopleVote Jan 23 #59

If we survive this abomination... Joinfortmill Jan 23 #58

Enough billionaires full stop. mr715 Jan 23 #60

This message was self-deleted by its author JHB Jan 23 #61

... orangecrush Saturday #70

Hit and run, OP? MorbidButterflyTat Jan 23 #63

Find Strong Leadership Wherever it May Be Roy Rolling Saturday #69