General Discussion

bigtree

(93,537 posts)

49. he's not there to divert from the accomplishment from his state

Reply to KPN (Reply #45)

Fri Jan 23, 2026, 01:15 PM

16 hrs ago

...and make the event about the White House.

Having to explain this just made me feel dumber than the premise.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

68 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

WHAT THE Fu*k CHUCK [View all] 4bonhoffer 20 hrs ago OP

Bipartisanship with Evil is Evil. dalton99a 20 hrs ago #1

The Big Blunder was back in March gab13by13 19 hrs ago #2

Yep. dalton99a 19 hrs ago #3

We MUST get rid of Schumer and all the rest of the Third Way institutionalists. The market is NOT beneign, it will NOT PatrickforB 18 hrs ago #14

The why is obvious. The 1%ers have bought the Congress, SCOTUS and the Presidency. flashman13 18 hrs ago #23

Jeffries too? ananda 17 hrs ago #32

Roger that! He is part of the stern concerned letter crew. flashman13 17 hrs ago #34

You speak my mind perfectly Patrick -- as usual. KPN 17 hrs ago #33

and not releasing all the files on trump when we had the chance samsingh 18 hrs ago #16

+1 leftstreet 18 hrs ago #25

Prediction: YES. He's going to vote to FUND ICE. Maru Kitteh 19 hrs ago #4

I'm in with you JustAnotherGen 18 hrs ago #13

And a domestic terrorist organization ... as is the whole frigging administration. KPN 17 hrs ago #35

You're quite correct, but I use the words "secret police" deliberately, because Maru Kitteh 16 hrs ago #43

Darned right!!! Same for Jeffries. I'm so fucking TIRED of these institutionalists letting Wall Street screw us over PatrickforB 18 hrs ago #17

Yep ... and Ds have needed to be that for more than 40 years now imo. A long 40+ years ... KPN 17 hrs ago #37

Will he vote to fund ICE next? kentuck 19 hrs ago #5

Post removed Post removed 19 hrs ago #6

he was there promoting the CHIPS and Science Act that HE and BIDEN had helped enact bigtree 19 hrs ago #7

A bit off topic, but why is Gaza in quotes? AloeVera 18 hrs ago #27

I dunno ... principle? KPN 16 hrs ago #38

do folks here like it when Democrats pass legislation that helps create jobs? bigtree 16 hrs ago #41

And instead of shaming Lutnick for politicizing the event -- as Lutnick would certainly have done to him KPN 16 hrs ago #45

he's not there to divert from the accomplishment from his state bigtree 16 hrs ago #49

Yes, really. In case you haven't noticed, you don't have a monopoly on what is the correct point of view. KPN 16 hrs ago #51

at least I'm not promoting the lie that Schumer covered here for Lutnick bigtree 16 hrs ago #52

I'll give you that, but do want to point out that the OP was based KPN 14 hrs ago #53

He thinks that some "old school" Republicans will come around. Happy Hoosier 19 hrs ago #8

Back in the Harry Reid days, bi-partisanship was possible... haele 19 hrs ago #9

Well, a semblance of bi-partisanship in the Harry Reid days. I'll give you that, but for far too many years now, KPN 16 hrs ago #39

Do you like Democratic initiatives that some republicans decide to support bigtree 16 hrs ago #50

Schumer's allegiance is to his financial backers Wild blueberry 19 hrs ago #10

Chuck bdamomma 19 hrs ago #11

I'm pretty sure he'll whip votes to fund ICE. More of that bipartisanship don't ya know. Autumn 19 hrs ago #12

In a word Mr.Bee 18 hrs ago #15

I thought he was still on his book tour. littlemissmartypants 18 hrs ago #18

We have to "keep our powder dry." SergeStorms 18 hrs ago #19

Agree completely Grim Chieftain 18 hrs ago #20

So did your post get removed? Inquiring minds want to know. KPN 16 hrs ago #40

Yes it did Grim Chieftain 16 hrs ago #44

Well, I for one am proud of you for taking that stand. There's some cognitive dissonance here at DU sometimes it seems. KPN 16 hrs ago #46

Thanks so much for your reply Grim Chieftain 16 hrs ago #47

"Anything could happen." I think that "anything" is already happening. And you're absolutely right. Scrivener7 7 hrs ago #64

Thank you Grim Chieftain 7 hrs ago #65

Primary everyone. Only a few incumbents are in my keep list. Tetrachloride 18 hrs ago #21

here's a fucking clue bigtree 18 hrs ago #24

i tend to think we're in a different generation Tetrachloride 13 hrs ago #55

I understand and appreciate the sentiment; and agree that everyone who isn't delivering should be primaried, KPN 16 hrs ago #42

ty. more exceptions that prove the rule Tetrachloride 13 hrs ago #56

this op is based on a lie that Schumer defended Lutnick bigtree 18 hrs ago #22

Isn't this thread going against the DU policy Layzeebeaver 18 hrs ago #26

That doesn't seem to be a thing anymore. MorbidButterflyTat 11 hrs ago #62

Thanks. I always have to scan for this string of posts to get the real Nixie 3 hrs ago #67

Yes it is, and I added your thread on this which corrects that intentional misrepresentation. It is sad that some are lostincalifornia 17 hrs ago #30

Reinstate... alimbalt 18 hrs ago #28

Only problem is that ISN'T WHAT HAPPENED. lostincalifornia 17 hrs ago #29

IMHO neither of the congressional leader are equip to deal with the delusional maniac in the White House usaf-vet 17 hrs ago #31

Chuckie gave up the crown. usonian 17 hrs ago #36

100 plus recs on a goddamn lie about our own Democratic leaders bigtree 16 hrs ago #48

Thank you, bigtree. murielm99 14 hrs ago #54

Hm. mr715 12 hrs ago #57

Oh, my. The profundity. murielm99 5 hrs ago #66

We're supposed to explode with rage and abandon the Democratic Party because ... Schumer and Jeffries? That's it? betsuni 2 hrs ago #68

Thank you LetMyPeopleVote 12 hrs ago #59

If we survive this abomination... Joinfortmill 12 hrs ago #58

Enough billionaires full stop. mr715 11 hrs ago #60

If Schumer were a post on DU he'd be hidden for not supporting Democrats. JHB 11 hrs ago #61

Hit and run, OP? MorbidButterflyTat 11 hrs ago #63