Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The cover of The Lancet, and their article on RFK Jr. [View all]highplainsdem
(61,310 posts)90. It isn't stalking you to notice you've started posting AI slop. I pointed out to you yesterday that when you
post in reply to my OP here, I will reply.
So you posted more AI slop here today and accused me of stalking you when I responded.
You posted one of your AI images in this thread I posted Wednesday about how dangerous AI is
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10143622015
and I posted this reply
7. Please don't post AI art here. It's part of the problem with this unethical, flawed tech.
and you self-deleted that, but then apparently decided it would be fun to bait me here.
I didn't attack you, Goonch, when I saw you taken in by a chatbot's misinformation and post it in a thread started by someons else, whom I'd already given the correct answer to, with links providing more information for them. I know chatbots can sound authoritative. That's why their answers have to be checked.
And I know using genAI to have AI generate an image for you can seem tempting.
But I know what it's trained on, and I've met too many people it's hurt, some close to suicide, to think it's harmless.
I also know what real creativity is, and genAI isn't real creativity.
I like seeing real art from people. When I see genAI, it's like looking at something assembled from the bones of real artists killed off by that tech. There probably have been suicides already. There have been students abandoning art majors and dreams of careers as artists. That's tragic.
I'm sorry you're partially blind. But if you can see well enough to use AI to generate images, or to select other images to post as you have, you can see well enough to create your own artwork, rather than what an AI patches together for you from other artists' stolen work.
I'd be interested in seeing that. I'd be more impressed by that, even a rough sketch, than lots of images you ask an AI tool to make for you.
And from what I know of art and artists, and I've known a lot of artists, it would be more rewarding for you, too.
But if you are insistent on using AI to create images, you can, as I said, find places on the internet where that stuff is welcome.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
2 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
94 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Please don't post AI art made using AI tools trained illegally on stolen intellectual property. AI slop
highplainsdem
Friday
#18
You know how I feel about how unethical genAI is. If you post AI slop in response to an OP I posted, I
highplainsdem
Friday
#40
What's generated by AI is not the AI user's art. I've tried AI image generators myself enough to know
highplainsdem
Friday
#43
While you were posting that, I was looking for an article to explain to anyone who hadn't tried AI image
highplainsdem
Friday
#48
AI slop just wastes water and electricity. And it isn't ususual for users of AI image generators to
highplainsdem
17 hrs ago
#80
You're baiting me, posting AI slop in this thread. I've helped you out when you posted misinformation
highplainsdem
17 hrs ago
#83
It isn't stalking you to notice you've started posting AI slop. I pointed out to you yesterday that when you
highplainsdem
15 hrs ago
#90
We don't have to accept what's wrong with it. Including unethical AI tools trained illegally on stolen
highplainsdem
18 hrs ago
#79
Would you eat at McDonald's if the business was built entirely on theft, as genAI is?
highplainsdem
17 hrs ago
#84
Not comparable. Unless forced by work or school, no one has to use genAI. But thanks for letting
highplainsdem
17 hrs ago
#87
And btw, if you want to know why so many people hate it, I suggest you go to Bluesky and post
highplainsdem
17 hrs ago
#86
😊We're An Inclusive Big Tent😊 -- One Person's 'AI SLOP' Is Another Person's Assisted Artistic Endeavor
MayReasonRule
18 hrs ago
#78
There are a lot of artists who are actually disabled who hate AI art, who've had some success as
highplainsdem
15 hrs ago
#92
Of all the clowns in the clown car, RFK Jr is the one who will do the most long-term damage in this shit show.
Initech
Friday
#8
They're evil and incompetent, but they're not smart enough to be James Bond villains.
highplainsdem
Friday
#19
The main qualification for an HHS Secretary is to listen to scientists, not to assume...
NNadir
Friday
#16
RFK Jr. was put at the head of HHS, so that he would destroy all these programs and so trump could take that money
MLWR
Friday
#9
That's the same link I posted, and doesn't work directly from DU either because DU's software won't
highplainsdem
Friday
#20
Yes, I saw, and posted a thank you, and mentioned both your replies in the edited OP.
highplainsdem
Friday
#27
It's chilling to note that the word "promised" appears repeatedly in the passage shown.
CBHagman
Friday
#21
They all are. The Trump regime would be one of the craziest sitcoms ever if the characters were just
highplainsdem
Friday
#30
Yeah, he sure would be ashamed of the ignorant fool who's playing with people's health. 🙁
Dave Bowman
Friday
#57
If it wasn't RFK Jr it would have been another clown like Dr. Oz or some Covid Conspiracy nut
maxsolomon
Friday
#29
Look up "HTML encoding" to fix links that break like this in the future if you want :)
AZJonnie
Friday
#31
Secretary Brainworm's thing about "shared decision making" for vaccines really irks me.
3catwoman3
Friday
#39
There is no surprise about anything Kennedy does. Those that confirmed him have no excuse.
Doodley
Friday
#53
Getting rid of people who might be on Social Security, Medicaid, or any government program repukes
highplainsdem
Friday
#63
They assume they'll still have good medical care. That mostly the poor will suffer and die.
highplainsdem
Friday
#65
Most self-professed Christians I know don't follow Christ's teachings very well, either.
highplainsdem
Friday
#69