Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(106,056 posts)
11. "the proposal, which is guaranteed to be expensive, doesn't yet have a cost estimate"
Mon Mar 9, 2026, 03:51 PM
Monday
The New Jersey senator’s plan would set the standard deduction at $75,000 for married couples, or $37,500 for individuals. That’s more than double what it is today: $32,200 for couples filing jointly and half that for single filers.
...
Booker’s bill, which he plans to formally introduce in the Senate on Tuesday, would have far-reaching ramifications on the tax system, encouraging more Americans to use the standard deduction rather than itemize. For a “head of household,” his bill would set the standard deduction at $56,250.
...
And the proposal, which is guaranteed to be expensive, doesn’t yet have a cost estimate. Booker said his goal is to ensure his bill is “fully paid for” by raising taxes on upper earners and large corporations, while closing loopholes and cracking down on “tax avoidance schemes.” The bill doesn't specify those provisions.

The legislation would also boost the child tax credit to $4,320 per child under 6 years old, and $3,600 per child between 6 and 17, while adding a $2,400 “baby bonus” for the year a child is born.


https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/sen-cory-booker-2028-potential-unveil-bill-making-75000-income-tax-fre-rcna262093

Does "head of household" here mean "single parent of non-earning child"? A singe adult living alone is a head of a household of 1. Are you a "head of household" if you have a child over 18 earning, and still living with you?

Anyway, not yet costed, nor saying what taxes would go up, so making it a bill seems premature. No-one could actually let it pass without those.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

No. Just no n/t leftstreet Monday #1
Why not? moose65 Monday #6
How about an explanation of your "no". Not real useful otherwise NoRethugFriends Monday #9
Tax higher incomes, slash pork spending leftstreet Monday #18
I don't know what neighborhood you live in.... SergeStorms Monday #20
That's not the effective rate for most leftstreet Monday #21
Yes please! at140 Monday #2
Squirrel! 50 Shades Of Blue Monday #3
Or to raise, or eliminate, the cap on Social Security displacedvermoter Monday #5
This instead. Ferrets are Cool Monday #13
THIS!☝️👆🖕 RainCaster Monday #30
Yes! Johnny2X2X Monday #4
No. No flat taxes moose65 Monday #8
No. Flat taxes are regressive NoRethugFriends Monday #10
It could be the trade off Johnny2X2X Monday #12
Why should somebody at 100,000 pay same rate as 1,000,000,000 NoRethugFriends Monday #15
They wouldn't Johnny2X2X Monday #16
It's essentially a flat tax Dave says Monday #25
Where the heck you getting your calculator? Johnny2X2X Monday #26
Oops! Dave says Monday #28
It's not perfect. Johnny2X2X Monday #29
I think they are trying to put things in place to counter AI. Basic income will be next. They will need billionaires Pisces Monday #7
"the proposal, which is guaranteed to be expensive, doesn't yet have a cost estimate" muriel_volestrangler Monday #11
Head of household generally means a single person with dependant household members resident at least 6 months if adult. haele Monday #22
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Monday #14
Stupid idea, rather than lower taxes we cut spending, specifically on the military. indusurb Monday #17
I'd rather actual tax policy that eliminates the cap on SS, raises taxes on wealthy and makes Nanjeanne Monday #19
Louder for the folks in the back... nt EarthFirst Monday #23
But what about the poor billionaires? Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Monday #24
It'll go nowhere. Just look at the liberals here. DJ Synikus Makisimus Monday #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Booker Pushes Bill to Mak...»Reply #11