Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erronis

(23,570 posts)
2. I've been programming since the early 1960s and still continue. I'm ambivalent about what's happening.
Mon Mar 9, 2026, 03:56 PM
14 hrs ago

My first language was BAL (Basic Assembler Language) for those brand-spanking new IBM 360s. Each instruction hand coded on coding sheets to be transferred to punch cards, ...

Then came macros for the assemblers and then higher-order languages such as COBOL, Fortran, C, Java, etc. Each new language built upon the lessons from the earlier ones and added features to make it easier to program and build systems.

I think the code assistants that were added to the IDEs started this trail into the woods - the assistants would finish statements and even code blocks. Wasn't yet called "Vibe coding" but was getting there.

The human is still needed to understand the problem at a high level and give prompts to the AI - this is iterative much like a partnership. And then to test/verify the results. I think the needs for this human-machine interactions will persist but moving higher up in the abstractions.

It could be a fascinating time, and a scary time.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How AI Assistants are Mov...»Reply #2