Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Irish_Dem

(80,862 posts)

7. No, damage is not necessary to be classified as vandalism.

Reply to WhiskeyGrinder (Reply #6)

Tue Mar 10, 2026, 09:43 AM

Yesterday

The law says defacing as well as damaging.
And the damage or defacing does not have to be permanent.

They can also be charged with littering, trespassing, disorderly conduct,
or criminal mischief simply for defacing property

I am just reading the law.

I guess the attorneys here can talk about if it is ever enforced that way.

The tricky part for the teen is that he killed someone accidentally
in the commission of another crime and most state laws reflect the idea
that this is not acceptable.

I don't know what the prosecutor will do here.
But I will be surprised if all charges are dropped.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

BeerBarrelPolka

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Authorities say a Georgia teacher was killed in a prank gone wrong. A teen is charged with homicide [View all] WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday OP

There has to be accountability exboyfil Yesterday #1

TPing is not vandalism. WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #2

Yes TPing a house is considered a form of vandalism. Irish_Dem Yesterday #5

A vandalism charge requires some form of damage. TPing, as you say, usually catches a charge of criminal mischief WhiskeyGrinder Yesterday #6

No, damage is not necessary to be classified as vandalism. Irish_Dem Yesterday #7

In not sure what law you are reading. Georgia law does not have a specific crime called vandalism. Ms. Toad Yesterday #13

The teacher didn't die from TPing. LisaL Yesterday #11

He may, or may not have been driving recklessly. Ms. Toad Yesterday #14

Again, he is charged with reckless driving. LisaL Yesterday #22

Simple answer - yes - when the relatives of the victim are asking for mercy. Ms. Toad Yesterday #23

My assertion is that he is charged with reckless driving, which he is. LisaL Yesterday #24

Because your statements sound like you believe it has been. Ms. Toad 22 hrs ago #27

The driver who hit and killed the teacher is charged with felonies. LisaL Yesterday #9

These kids were expressing their love for him. There are such things as accidents, Greybnk48 Yesterday #3

And yet we do have very specific rules for driving. LisaL Yesterday #10

We don't know. Ms. Toad Yesterday #15

He is charged with reckless driving. LisaL Yesterday #21

Let me help you out Greg_In_SF Yesterday #12

Every other weekend for next 5 years IbogaProject Yesterday #4

The student driving, at 18, is no LisaL Yesterday #8

I was refering to that high school kid's parents IbogaProject Yesterday #16

They should be banned from using toilet paper. Georgia should have a plentiful supply of corncobs RedWhiteBlueIsRacist Yesterday #17

I doubt the DA ultimately takes this to trial or insists on those charges ScratchCat Yesterday #18

Hopefully they had to pay for all the damages to the house they caused MichMan Yesterday #20

As a confessed former TP-er, it's tragic. Would never pull those pranks today...too allegorical oracle Yesterday #19

I almost ran over my own husband once. KentuckyWoman Yesterday #25

If they hadn't ever pulled the prank, the teacher would still be alive. MichMan Yesterday #26