He's going to get away with all of it, isn't he? n/t

[ABC123Easy]

42. Totally disagree

Your quote was, "until the court is expanded" referring to SCOTUS. Your point is based on the SCOTUS. You don't get to change at this point. I dismantled your claim regarding SCOTUS so you've attempted to move on to another topic.

Garland appointing a Special Council to investigate Dolt45 on DAY 1, has nothing to do with the SCOTUS whose immunity ruling didn't exist until much, much later, nor does it depend upon court scheduling.

To quote yourself, you clearly do not understand how special councils work, the powers of the AG, to appoint them, nor an understanding of short term and long term history of the SC rules.

If that wimp Garland had not been twiddling his thumbs and clutching his pearls, Aileen Cannon would most likely have not been given the Jack Smith case given the rotating schedule these level judges follow. She was assigned other cases at the time.

Stick to your original assertions and don't move to another topic to cover when your logic has been shown to be lacking.