Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fiendish Thingy

(22,898 posts)
44. You dismantled nothing
Tue Mar 10, 2026, 01:59 PM
3 hrs ago

My assertions are evidence based, and have been discussed thousands of times, by myself and others, over the last few years here at DU, long before you came here.

The OP was “Will he get away with it?”

The immunity ruling which protects Trump from federal criminal prosecution will stand unless/until the court is expanded and the MAGA majority is neutralized.

(Historical note: SCOTUS has been expanded/contracted by congress several times in the history of the US, from as few as 6 justices to as many as 10)

Appointing a special counsel on day one would have been inappropriate and unjustified, but most importantly, would have made absolutely no difference , since SC’s have no special powers or authority. Your insistence that they do shows your lack of understanding.

If, instead of merely watching the clock and calendar, you had paid closer attention to the investigations and prosecutions, and the numerous delays Trump sought and was granted by various appellate judges and ultimately SCOTUS, you would understand how the choice of AG didn’t matter in attempting to bring Trump to trial before the election.

(Note: Cannon was selected from a pool of just three judges. Even if she hadn’t been selected, Trump would still have sought and gotten the same kind of delays he did in the J6 case. The only way to have avoided the possibility of Cannon being assigned would have been for Smith to convene the grand jury in DC, which would have brought challenges of inappropriate/incorrect venue and possible dismissal of charges)

Links for your education, and to prevent further public embarrassment:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_counsel

Www.emptywheel.net

(Note: unless you have the desire, stamina and patience for wading through court transcripts, emptywheel may not be for you, but if you do, searching for “Garland” should produce links to all the archived posts around the investigations and prosecutions)


Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Bush did. Why shouldn't Trump? leftstreet Yesterday #1
Two Bushes and a Nixon. Kid Berwyn Yesterday #6
If the past predicts the future, yep. Every last bit. RockRaven Yesterday #2
Yes, looking forwards not backwards fucked this country up. SamKnause Yesterday #4
The ironic part? MustLoveBeagles Yesterday #18
I am a diehard Dem. My first thoguhts on this are that he will get away with it. Then, I look at the midterms OLDMDDEM Yesterday #3
I applaud your optimism Bettie Yesterday #13
I understand your point. I lived in Nebraska (Omaha) for many years. Now I live in Maryland. OLDMDDEM Yesterday #15
It is possible PatSeg 4 hrs ago #43
Israel and AIPAC will see that he does Ponietz Yesterday #5
Probably. He will die before there are consequences. MineralMan Yesterday #7
Even if he drops a nuke and we all die he'll get away with everything. dem4decades Yesterday #8
I think his plan is to take us all with him. dedl67 Yesterday #30
That will make the religious right happy. dem4decades Yesterday #37
Yes. JBTaurus83 Yesterday #9
Yep ABC123Easy Yesterday #10
Pick your preferred AG, the outcome would have been *exactly* the same: Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #19
I disagree ABC123Easy Yesterday #23
Answer this one question: Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #34
So you're saying ABC123Easy Yesterday #36
You were referring to the power of Garland as AG Fiendish Thingy 22 hrs ago #38
Totally disagree ABC123Easy 4 hrs ago #42
You dismantled nothing Fiendish Thingy 3 hrs ago #44
Keep trying to change the subject ABC123Easy 2 hrs ago #45
Well, that was substance-free Fiendish Thingy 2 hrs ago #46
You should change your username to ABC123Easy 2 hrs ago #47
Yes. CentralMass Yesterday #11
F47 might, but his followers won't be so lucky 0rganism Yesterday #12
He's already divided the populace - for generations. maxsolomon Yesterday #14
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Yesterday #16
I see it happening again to some extent too. The recent ugly comments about Jeffries... QueerDuck Yesterday #20
This message was self-deleted by its author PeaceWave Yesterday #22
Is he? Fiendish Thingy Yesterday #17
He will get away with it, if he dies soon. Otherwise probably not. delisen Yesterday #21
Nobody is going to hold him accountable, so yes. Yes he is. flvegan Yesterday #24
How will this happen ? RANDYWILDMAN Yesterday #25
I think we will be so glad to see the last of him. We won't try to hold him accountable. Walleye Yesterday #26
Indeed. And based upon the comments , we see it the same. Bread and Circuses Yesterday #27
Yes. Irish_Dem Yesterday #28
I'm guessing no, he won't get away with it Torchlight Yesterday #29
Sorry - knew the outcome of this movie before it even started Cosmocat Yesterday #31
And he knew it then and he knows it now. NCDem47 Yesterday #32
It was never just about "him" or Bush or any of them. FraDon Yesterday #33
Yup. WestMichRad Yesterday #35
He got away with orchestrating an insurrection too. Emile 22 hrs ago #39
40 percent of the country supports him JI7 22 hrs ago #40
No. QueerDuck 22 hrs ago #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»He's going to get away wi...»Reply #44