Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cheezoholic

(3,938 posts)
5. I believe it was to Jack the price of oil 100%. It pays off the onshore big oil donors who were next in line first
Sat May 23, 2026, 08:51 AM
Yesterday

2nd, it pulled Putin out of the bottom of the well he was drowning in and in fact gave him enough breath's that once again Europe is considering Russia a greater threat than they were just 6 months ago. 3rd it puts pressure on Europe and NATO economically to the point that in combination with Eloon throwing his billions around over there supporting far right parties he could try and force regime change to leaders more friendly to him and weaken Europe in general. Not saying FatFuck thought this out that deep but the sinister minds that really pull the levers, this was a 100% positive play to enrich friends and themselves and to attempt to get far dicktaters in play and upset the balance of power in Europe which they see as enemy number 1 to them.

Recommendations

6 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It is always about power, control, money. Irish_Dem Yesterday #1
Yup, follow the money. Venazuela has the largest reserves of oil... Now we control in. Who has the mitch96 Yesterday #21
PNAC Lives Kid Berwyn Yesterday #2
Had Alan Dulles not spearheaded the overthrow of Iran's government in 1953, Iran might be an ally today. Lonestarblue Yesterday #9
I can appreciate Truman's reasoning here, but just like slightlv Yesterday #15
If the Venezuelans realize that Delcy turned Maduro in, those in his inner circle Baitball Blogger Yesterday #3
Absolutely, gab13by13 Yesterday #4
I believe it was to Jack the price of oil 100%. It pays off the onshore big oil donors who were next in line first Cheezoholic Yesterday #5
I thought that the position of president in Iran wnylib Yesterday #6
My scorecard looks very different GreatGazoo Yesterday #7
Nice post, I like it, gab13by13 Yesterday #10
I like your points about more than oil needs to move through Hormuz GreatGazoo Yesterday #18
And Iranians will never forget . . . AverageOldGuy Yesterday #8
Maybe if Democrats regain control of government gab13by13 Yesterday #12
And we keep giving them more things to "remember"... Wounded Bear Yesterday #13
Why does the press never challenge Trump when he spews these absurd lies? OGBuzz Yesterday #11
If that indeed was the "plan" it was a stupid plan from the get go. onenote Yesterday #14
Not to mention that gab13by13 Yesterday #16
We had better plans when we played army as kids and we were 6 years old. surfered Yesterday #17
Did Kraznov really *think* he could achieve regime change in Iran, then control their oil? Martin Eden Yesterday #19
I think Ahmadenijad is dead. ChicagoTeamster Yesterday #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»We Now Know With Certaint...»Reply #5