Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

1 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I would think that the very fact that this meeing was even deemed niyad 5 hrs ago #1
Sanders and Warren have been his big boosters, too. yardwork 5 hrs ago #2
It does, indeed. niyad 5 hrs ago #3
I think Warren made a good point that marital issues are different than sexual assault AZProgressive 5 hrs ago #4
Vastly different. EdmondDantes_ 5 hrs ago #6
I agree AZProgressive 5 hrs ago #7
Apparently the rape apologist ones weren't, either. niyad 1 hr ago #13
"denied any credible allegations" Quiet Em 5 hrs ago #5
It is an unusual qualifier. mr715 4 hrs ago #8
It actually isn't unusual when you follow news stories about accusations made against famous people AZProgressive 4 hrs ago #9
It seemed hedgy to me in this context. mr715 4 hrs ago #10
Credible versus non-credible or dubious or unreliable, etc. Celerity 1 hr ago #15
We've elected a President who is twice divorced and cheated on ALL THREE of his wives--- Jack Valentino 3 hrs ago #11
But if not for a consequential contingent of the left giving a tinker's a damn... W_HAMILTON 1 hr ago #16
"Sen. Elizabeth Warren, MorbidButterflyTat 3 hrs ago #12
I guess there is a difference between those and rape apologist posts, too. niyad 1 hr ago #14
Right? Why would Sen Warren even Cha 32 min ago #18
No way something else doesn't happen, putting cash money on the table right now. It's a bet. betsuni 35 min ago #17
Seems like an exercise in futility to me. DFW 10 min ago #19
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Senators Privately Ask Pl...»Reply #13